Silhouette when are you going to champion arresting all single parents for child abuse?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Silhouette when are you going to champion arresting all single parents for child abuse?
Never. Because single parents may still marry the opposite gender. So they aren't trying to clamp down on kids for life and deprive them of a necessity via a contractual term..Silhouette when are you going to champion arresting all single parents for child abuse?
i see. so you're okay with child abuse so long as there is the possibility that someday, maybe, it might stopNever. Because single parents may still marry the opposite gender.Silhouette when are you going to champion arresting all single parents for child abuse?
i see. so you're okay with child abuse so long as there is the possibility that someday, maybe, it might stop
ah. i see. so if you beat a child but they have hope that you'll stop it's not abuse.i see. so you're okay with child abuse so long as there is the possibility that someday, maybe, it might stop
It isn't child abuse if the child still has hope.
ah. i see. so if you beat a child but they have hope that you'll stop it's not abuse.
what sort of damage do you think an endless parade of suitors does to a child?ah. i see. so if you beat a child but they have hope that you'll stop it's not abuse.
Non sequitur. "Gay marriage" equivalent would be if you bound a child to a contract that said "you will be beaten every day for the rest of your life".
what sort of damage do you think an endless parade of suitors does to a child?
how long do you think the prison sentence should be for parents that divorce?
so single parents can deny their child a two parent home forever parading sexual partner after sexual partner through the home and it's not abuse because 'hope', but a loving, stable, two parent homosexual home is abuse because 'contract?'what sort of damage do you think an endless parade of suitors does to a child?
how long do you think the prison sentence should be for parents that divorce?
Again, non sequitur. There is no contractual cement to a single parent. All manner of different things happen while hope remains alive. The hope is eradicated upon the wet signature on a gay marriage contract/license.
i see. so you're okay with child abuse so long as there is the possibility that someday, maybe, it might stop
It isn't child abuse if the child still has hope. That's the key difference. In "gay marriage" it is synonymous with "the eradication of hope that the children will ever have the missing parent". The abuse is the mental prison of loss of hope. Meditate on that. A contract cannot place a child in a mental prison. Also, brush up on the Infant Doctrine and necessities in contracts and meditate on that too..
A state cannot be part of a contract that formally places any child in a mental prison for life.
what sort of damage do you think an endless parade of suitors does to a child?
how long do you think the prison sentence should be for parents that divorce?
so single parents can deny their child a two parent home forever parading sexual partner after sexual partner through the home and it's not abuse because 'hope', but a loving, stable, two parent homosexual home is abuse because 'contract?'
and you haven't answered the question about parents that divorce. how long should we lock them up for abusing their child(ren)
what sort of damage do you think an endless parade of suitors does to a child?
how long do you think the prison sentence should be for parents that divorce?
Again, non sequitur. There is no contractual cement to a single parent. All manner of different things happen while hope remains alive. The hope is eradicated upon the wet signature on a gay marriage contract/license.
Non sequitur. "Gay marriage" equivalent would be if you bound a child to a contract that said "you will be beaten every day for the rest of your life".
A child being beaten without a contractual bind does have hope still that it will stop. Especially if society steps in to get the parent counseling. With gay marriage it's "you will be beaten every day for the rest of your life and society is barred from intervening."
Again, non sequitur. There is no contractual cement to a single parent.
Never. Because single parents may still marry the opposite gender. So they aren't trying to clamp down on kids for life and deprive them of a necessity via a contractual termSilhouette when are you going to champion arresting all single parents for child abuse?
i see. so you're okay with child abuse so long as there is the possibility that someday, maybe, it might stop
It isn't child abuse if the child still has hope. That's the key difference..
The hypothetical single or divorced parents you mention are just that: hypothetical..