Don't underestimate me, I'm sure I can find something more irrelevant.Nothing could be more irrelevant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't underestimate me, I'm sure I can find something more irrelevant.Nothing could be more irrelevant.
I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.
Who said anything about baby killing?
I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.
Quote where I said "all."
You cant do it.
I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.
Your exceptions (the rare, annecdotal and only occasional) actually prove the rule.
they
Who said anything about baby killing?
I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.
Quote where I said "all."
You cant do it.
I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.
Your exceptions (the rare, annecdotal and only occasional) actually prove the rule.
they aren't 'exceptions'; 'social Darwinism' is part and parcel of right wing ideology, and part of 'libertarian' ideology as well. Conservatives are less prone to babbling their solidarity with left wing social policies, their influences are still more based on a morality absent from ideologues and sociopaths.
they
I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.
Quote where I said "all."
You cant do it.
I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.
Your exceptions (the rare, annecdotal and only occasional) actually prove the rule.
they aren't 'exceptions'; 'social Darwinism' is part and parcel of right wing ideology, and part of 'libertarian' ideology as well. Conservatives are less prone to babbling their solidarity with left wing social policies, their influences are still more based on a morality absent from ideologues and sociopaths.
Projections (especially in the absence of supportive data) noted.
they
Quote where I said "all."
You cant do it.
I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.
Your exceptions (the rare, annecdotal and only occasional) actually prove the rule.
they aren't 'exceptions'; 'social Darwinism' is part and parcel of right wing ideology, and part of 'libertarian' ideology as well. Conservatives are less prone to babbling their solidarity with left wing social policies, their influences are still more based on a morality absent from ideologues and sociopaths.
Projections (especially in the absence of supportive data) noted.
You're just desperate to deflect, is all; duly noted. you can't back up what you said, so deny saying it which doesn't work unless you get a mod to delete your post. you know what I say is true about the right wing, and it's just as destructive and mindless as its left wing fellow sociopaths..
Noncitizen illegal vote number higher than estimated - Washington TimesNow you're just fantasizing. Trump put together a committee to look into these after the election. They quietly disbanded when they found no significant issues. The only fraud I'm aware of was done by the GOP.As rotten a candidate Hillary was and as good a candidate Trump was, she still got more votes than he did.The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the timeI guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.
True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.
Even without the dead voters, illegals and other frauds?
Everyone should look after themselves, you're otherwise promoting theft from those who have more than you. This is inherently unethical. If an unaccountable monopoly on arbitration is legitimate in stealing the fruits of your labor, you are necessarily their slave. Even if it wasn't completely unethical, the Government is not capable of sustaining itself, let alone any social programs, because of the law of diminishing returns(Less and less tax revenue is taken in upon reaching a 10% tax rate, is the high estimate) has shown that they'll simply collapse themselves eventually, as the cost of all of these agencies increases as more are added. The Even if points A and B were invalid, the Government is also incapable of properly allocating resources, due to the economic calculation problem.Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?
What?
That you can NEVER spend too much on the military, that the poor should basically look after themselves, that trickle-down-economics works, that protectionism is good, that only paying lip service to a balanced budget is fine, that life begins at conception?
No...those ideas are NOT proven...unless you mean proven to be utter nonsense.
Both major parties offer some good ideas and a TON of stupid ones (the left's latest, socialism mania is a good example of the latter. Guaranteed income for all? Pleeeease.).