CDZ Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

[Chuz Life]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

Proven:
If you kill a criminal, he is no longer a threat to society.

 

[Picaro]

Right wing tabloids are just as dishonest and spread as much fake news as the left wing tabloids do., no doubt about it. That's because media in general is corrupt and one-sided, paid ti lie, whether it is lying by omission or just everyday old-fashioned lying. The difference is the right wing has more diverse opinions, and the majority of those who identify as right wing and indie are usually also at least somewhat patriotic, while the 'left' is merely an assortment of spoiled dipshit dope addled neo-fascist nihilists.who are Mad At Daddy and/or still pissed off because some cop gave them a ticket one time or something, or because Da Evul Xians said Bad Things about bestiality, or homo degenerates, or other deviants, or try and make them look bad for liking kiddie porn or some other deranged hobby and fetish they have, so they run around pretending to be 'enilghtened n tolerant n stuff', but are too stupid and insane to pull it off convincingly to any body but other dipshits; they have zero beneficial traits that off-set even one of their mental issues. Many right wingers also share the same traits, but they're easy to spot, and they mostly get hired by Wall Street, so they're isolated from the general run of conservatives and patriots.

 

[Picaro]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

 

[Picaro]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.

 

[alang1216]

Right wing tabloids are just as dishonest and spread as much fake news as the left wing tabloids do., no doubt about it. That's because media in general is corrupt and one-sided, paid ti lie, whether it is lying by omission or just everyday old-fashioned lying. The difference is the right wing has more diverse opinions, and the majority of those who identify as right wing and indie are usually also at least somewhat patriotic, while the 'left' is merely an assortment of spoiled dipshit dope addled neo-fascist nihilists.who are Mad At Daddy and/or still pissed off because some cop gave them a ticket one time or something, or because Da Evul Xians said Bad Things about bestiality, or homo degenerates, or other deviants, or try and make them look bad for liking kiddie porn or some other deranged hobby and fetish they have, so they run around pretending to be 'enilghtened n tolerant n stuff', but are too stupid and insane to pull it off convincingly to any body but other dipshits; they have zero beneficial traits that off-set even one of their mental issues. Many right wingers also share the same traits, but they're easy to spot, and they mostly get hired by Wall Street, so they're isolated from the general run of conservatives and patriots.

You hang out with a very degenerate group of people.

 

[Tax Man]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

You are sooo wrong! The only tards are the reich ones on this forum. This includes you!

 

[alang1216]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

You are sooo wrong! The only tards are the reich ones on this forum. This includes you!

So very wrong. If the right seeks truth why does the Conservative-in-Chief have to lie so often?

 

[Chuz Life]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

Who said anything about baby killing?

 

[Picaro]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

Who said anything about baby killing?

I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.

 

[Picaro]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

You are sooo wrong! The only tards are the reich ones on this forum. This includes you!

So very wrong. If the right seeks truth why does the Conservative-in-Chief have to lie so often?

Why do left wingers have to rely on lying about Trump lying? Your Fake News campaigns have already knocked you deviants out of any credible criticisms of, well, anybody else on the planet. that happened within days of Trump announcing he would run in the GOP primaries, when your media would blatantly lie within seconds of when he said anything at all. That's why he could single-handedly shut down the effects of billions of dollars in DNC campaign propaganda and and mock your media toadies with impunity ever since. Your own little Party of deviants and gimps and traitors is disintegrating. lol AOC, Pelosi, Bernie, Maxine, Harris, lunatic Muslims in the House, ... lol lol lol your peers are toast.

 

[Chuz Life]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

Who said anything about baby killing?

I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.

Quote where I said "all."

You cant do it.

 

[alang1216]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.

As rotten a candidate Hillary was and as good a candidate Trump was, she still got more votes than he did.

 

[alang1216]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

You are sooo wrong! The only tards are the reich ones on this forum. This includes you!

So very wrong. If the right seeks truth why does the Conservative-in-Chief have to lie so often?

Why do left wingers have to rely on lying about Trump lying? Your Fake News campaigns have already knocked you deviants out of any credible criticisms of, well, anybody else on the planet. that happened within days of Trump announcing he would run in the GOP primaries, when your media would blatantly lie within seconds of when he said anything at all. That's why he could single-handedly shut down the effects of billions of dollars in DNC campaign propaganda and and mock your media toadies with impunity ever since. Your own little Party of deviants and gimps and traitors is disintegrating. lol AOC, Pelosi, Bernie, Maxine, Harris, lunatic Muslims in the House, ... lol lol lol your peers are toast.

If you don't realize that Trump is a salesman and will say just about anything to make his sale, you are deluding yourself. If you believe he is more honest than most politicians, you have not done your homework.

 

[Chuz Life]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.

As rotten a candidate Hillary was and as good a candidate Trump was, she still got more votes than he did.

Even without the dead voters, illegals and other frauds?

 

[Picaro]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

Who said anything about baby killing?

I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.

Quote where I said "all."

You cant do it.

I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.

 

[Chuz Life]

More often than not, the right seeks truth and they (we) adjust our views accordingly.

Leftardz tend to ignore truth and facts. Especially when those truths and facts pose a threat or challenge to their agenda.

I disagree; baby killing is quite popular with many right wing cultists as well, for instance. 'Many 'Libertarians' are just as big on 'NAMBLA Logic' as left wing mass murderers are. they're big on 'Social Darwinism', never mind they don't seern to understand Darwin's theories well at all; that isn't a handicap in their minds. they can rely on Cato and some other Koch fronts to tell them what they need to recite. 'Right wing' and 'conservative' aren't synonyms.

Who said anything about baby killing?

I did; you seem to have a bizarre belief that right wingers all care about 'truth'. They don't, many share a lot of rubbish beliefs with left wingers.

Quote where I said "all."

You cant do it.

I dn't have to, your claim is out there. What you can't do is claim is right wingers don't support 'choice', or agree with left wingers on all sorts of 'causes' that are detrimental to the country.

Your exceptions (the rare, annecdotal and only occasional) actually prove the rule.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.

As rotten a candidate Hillary was and as good a candidate Trump was, she still got more votes than he did.

Nothing could be more irrelevant.

 

[danielpalos]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

No. The right wingers don't understand most of the concepts and have to resort to special pleading to try to make points they don't have.

 

[alang1216]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

True, but the margin they 'won' by is tiny relative to past mid-terms; many of the Democrats that gained seats were opposed to the Kavenaugh witch hunt, for instance, not a good thing for the freak show running the DNC now.

As rotten a candidate Hillary was and as good a candidate Trump was, she still got more votes than he did.

Even without the dead voters, illegals and other frauds?

Now you're just fantasizing. Trump put together a committee to look into these after the election. They quietly disbanded when they found no significant issues. The only fraud I'm aware of was done by the GOP.