SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,281
- 280
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd explain the circumstance, but you are too dense and hateful to understand. Plus, you don't like animals so why bother.
Asking questions means you are melting down. That's what you said when I asked questions, right?I'd explain the circumstance, but you are too dense and hateful to understand. Plus, you don't like animals so why bother.
I don't like animals? Where do you get that from? Never mind, it's irrelevant.
I asked a question about the rules Doesn't matter if I like animals or not, you claimed that a moderator said that the no family rule applies to pets, I'm asking for a clarification.
If it's not covered in the rules, and someone chooses to attack a poster's pet, then that would just reflect on the person hitting below the belt, imo.
You are too dense and nasty to explain it to.If it's not covered in the rules, and someone chooses to attack a poster's pet, then that would just reflect on the person hitting below the belt, imo.
I don't disagree with you Sherry. My quarrel is strictly with the idea that pets are covered under the no family rule as Gracie claimed.
There have been times when we have invoked the family rule with certain posters.
Ding ding ding.I could see that if someone used a dead pet to harass another poster.
Ding ding ding.I could see that if someone used a dead pet to harass another poster.
There are lines that should not be crossed. If those lines are crossed, shit happens.
That comment is NOT PERSONAL. Using a dead pet IS PERSONAL.Ding ding ding.I could see that if someone used a dead pet to harass another poster.
There are lines that should not be crossed. If those lines are crossed, shit happens.
But that doesn't mean pets are covered under no family.
I mean if I called your dog a homosexual retard, would that be against the rules? Nope.
There have been times when we have invoked the family rule with certain posters.
That comment is NOT PERSONAL. Using a dead pet IS PERSONAL.Ding ding ding.I could see that if someone used a dead pet to harass another poster.
There are lines that should not be crossed. If those lines are crossed, shit happens.
But that doesn't mean pets are covered under no family.
I mean if I called your dog a homosexual retard, would that be against the rules? Nope.
Again...you are too dense to "get it".That comment is NOT PERSONAL. Using a dead pet IS PERSONAL.Ding ding ding.I could see that if someone used a dead pet to harass another poster.
There are lines that should not be crossed. If those lines are crossed, shit happens.
But that doesn't mean pets are covered under no family.
I mean if I called your dog a homosexual retard, would that be against the rules? Nope.
Exactly, which means pets are not covered the same way family is.If I told you your child was a retard, that would be a violation. If I tell you your dog is, that's no violation.
pets are family members in my book and should be treated as such.