Dot Com
Nullius in verba
:yawn: You're a Levin-listening hack. Nothing more. You're told what to believe. Rejoice in your close-mindedness
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.
The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite?
:yawn: You're a Levin-listening hack. Nothing more. You're told what to believe. Rejoice in your close-mindedness
Republicans also hold the record for breathing oxygen......Keep adding qualifiers to find something you can pin on Democrats. Meanwhile, the record for spending remains with Republicans. And see that? No qualifiers needed.as long as we're clear that the Dems are the kings of spending more than you have......No, that would be Democrats. But that was also due to the Great Recession. And don't forget ... Bush approved the continuing resolution which budgeted spending for half of FY2009. But to return to the discussion, which was spending, not deficits ... the biggest spending years occurred under Republican-led Houses.does that somehow give retroactive control of the House to Republicans for 2009 and 2010?.....those were the two years when Obama created most of his record breaking deficit.....but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....
No, but the views you hold are a reflection of how smart, perceptive, and logical you are.
And I agree, wholeheartedly.
Intelligent people do not espouse impossibilities as true.
Of course not.
If one insists on believing ideologies that make no comprehensible sense in the real world, one has no one else to blame for being viewed as stupid or possibly insane.
People are entitled to their own opinions, and their own stupidity. It matters not from who it comes from.
No, but the views you hold are a reflection of how smart, perceptive, and logical you are.
And I agree, wholeheartedly.
Intelligent people do not espouse impossibilities as true.
Of course not.
If one insists on believing ideologies that make no comprehensible sense in the real world, one has no one else to blame for being viewed as stupid or possibly insane.
People are entitled to their own opinions, and their own stupidity. It matters not from who it comes from.
You're proof of that!
Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.
The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite?
That's seriously clueless, liberals say that all the time. But as for why liberals are dumber than everyone else, it's an ideology that advances the farce that government makes choices over our lives better than we do. There are two types of liberals, those who believe they can control those choices and those who believe them. There are a lot more of the latter than the former and they are the ones who aren't as intelligent as an average person.
Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.
The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.
I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.
Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?
Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?
ok my mistake, it was ANOTHER rw hate monger , Michael Weiner then.Interesting considering i have NEVER listened to Levin lol
You're just a dumb bitch.
Let me spell this out for youok my mistake, it was ANOTHER rw hate monger , Michael Weiner then.Interesting considering i have NEVER listened to Levin lol
You're just a dumb bitch.
Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Take the rw, hate radio- cawk outta' yer mouth Grampa Murked U and use a grown-up siggie whydoncha?
That where you got your hateful FAILsiggie then you start a thread "Happy Thanksgiving Everyone"? Go F' yourself
Unlike you & so many others i am capable of thinking stuff up on my own. That sig is my opinion & i love that it pisses you off so much. Never seen someone online have such a hissy fit that it drags on for weeks.So where's your siggie from shit stain? You channeling Weiner?
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk