It's easy to know when I have caught you in a BS lie.wrong again. Arabia was a diverse land in which Pagan, and Jewish, and
Christian tribes MAINTAINED their own DIFFERENT customs especially in terms
of religious practice. Of course there were some superficial "meldings"----as in
cuisine, crafts and styles of dress. The confusion those more superficial
"meldings" have produced have even led to the idiot concept that there is something properly called "Islamic architecture"-------Islamic architecture is a tent in the desert. BYZANTINE architecture is NOT "Islamic"
You start posting wildly inaccurate off topic nonsense to cover your tracks.
Quite amusing.......![]()
"inaccurate" what? my comment is quite accurate. In arabia-----'arabs'---
were completely illiterate except for the few that learned languages other than
Arabic until about 300 AD-----when some people began to develope a written
language for ARABIC -----based on the various written languages of non-arabs
who resided in the area. Zoroastrians still used their FARSI-----Christians
tended toward Greek and Latin ---and jews did their Hebrew. What are you
calling "inaccurate" Despite the fact that an Arabic written form got developed---
most "arabs" remained illiterate