itfitzme
VIP Member
I see ed called me a liar
My opinion is simple
to create any jobs you have to go past the number of people in the work force %
We had 500,000 enter the not in column last month while losing over 300,000 in the labor force
That is simply put is creating only more people for the tax payer to support
If your going to look at things simply, why get complicated about it?
Mine is even simpler, to create jobs we have to employ more people.
Since March, we had 583,000 added.
Seems to me your skipping simple, getting only so complicated as to prove your a-priori position, then claiming simplicity.
Sounds like lying to me, if we are to see things simplistically. Your either lying about adding jobs are lying about being simple.
Date............EmpRatioNSA......UnempRateNSA......EmpLevelNSA......AddedJobs
4/1/2012......58.49%..................7.74%..................141995..................583
3/1/2012......58.29%..................8.36%..................141412..................728
2/1/2012......58.03%..................8.71%..................140684..................740
1/1/2012......57.76%..................8.82%..................139944..................-737
12/1/2011....58.47%..................8.28%..................140681..................-389
11/1/2011....58.67%..................8.21%..................141070....................83
10/1/2011....58.68%..................8.50%..................140987..................485
9/1/2011......58.53%..................8.78%..................140502..................167
8/1/2011......58.50%..................9.08%..................140335...................-49
7/1/2011......58.57%..................9.32%..................140384..................255
6/1/2011......58.51%..................9.32%..................140129..................101
5/1/2011......58.51%..................8.75%..................140028..................367
4/1/2011......58.40%..................8.66%..................139661
Again, I don't think going from 58.4% to 58.49% employment ratio is anything to get all excited about. And that 8.66% to 7.74% unemp rate is "squirrely". But as we are being all simple about it, there isn't much else to say.
great info
The reason it is falling is there is 3-1 leaving the work force (real close)
Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age
How do you figure that, "3-1 leaving the work force"?
April 2011, LFNSA = 152,898. April 2012, LFNSA = 153,905. That is LF increasing.