- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,470
- 10,047
- 900
- Thread starter
- #21
Its all irrelevant until you do or study a cost benefit analysis before bitching about it at surface level like a ****. Any pragmatic mind surely knows this.
And the military spending is atrocious. Absolutely disgusting at all kinds of disturbing levels. Did you know that some quarters to justify keeping their budgets lofty, theyll do things such as order a fuck ton of staplers toward the end of a quarter? Surely you see a problem with that and arent just a bitch to bitch kinda guy.
What kind of "cost benefit analysis" is spending $202,000 to study a privately held company "systematic gender bias"?
Why is the NSF doing this in the first place?
Wouldn't gender bias be part of if any the responsibility of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity agency if any?
And short of doing any "critical" analysis on YOUR part at least I'm recognizing it while you are obviously oblivious to it.
Recognizing a problem is the first step in solving and your bitching about MY raising questions doesn't do any good.
Why don't YOU provide the "cost benefit analysis" if you know how to do it in the first place.