Jason1977
Member
Anyone else feel frustrated with the polarized operation of the way things work? As if I needed to ask....
One extreme on one side, one extreme on the other, meanwhile seldom do people jump on the 3rd party ticket? For me personally, I identify with some of what both sides of the aisle are for. What frustrates me is it is almost always polarized.
SO: Given the option, if you knew there was a middle of the road candidate, would you select a balanced / compromising candidate over your own party affiliation? Anyone out there match that description? Care to weigh in?
I know I would. I tend to favor balance over absolutism on either side. Not sure who fits the bill though.
One extreme on one side, one extreme on the other, meanwhile seldom do people jump on the 3rd party ticket? For me personally, I identify with some of what both sides of the aisle are for. What frustrates me is it is almost always polarized.
SO: Given the option, if you knew there was a middle of the road candidate, would you select a balanced / compromising candidate over your own party affiliation? Anyone out there match that description? Care to weigh in?
I know I would. I tend to favor balance over absolutism on either side. Not sure who fits the bill though.