Anyone else feel frustrated with the polarized operation of the way things work? As if I needed to ask.... One extreme on one side, one extreme on the other, meanwhile seldom do people jump on the 3rd party ticket? For me personally, I identify with some of what both sides of the aisle are for. What frustrates me is it is almost always polarized. SO: Given the option, if you knew there was a middle of the road candidate, would you select a balanced / compromising candidate over your own party affiliation? Anyone out there match that description? Care to weigh in? I know I would. I tend to favor balance over absolutism on either side. Not sure who fits the bill though.