Anti-NRA rally draws huge crowds.

[Pete7469]

We really need to be concerned about these people, they're a threat to our rights and the collective intelligence of humanity.

Five sad pictures from today?s anti-NRA March | WashingtonExaminer.com

 

[Yurt]

holy moly

a hundred people

the nra must be shaking in their holsters

 

[nitroz]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I've seen more people online at Jazz Fest waiting on the Porta-Potty.

 

[PredFan]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I've seen more people online at Jazz Fest waiting on the Porta-Potty.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pS9ZNEzOL4]Tea Time 12 - 2010-05-13 Itty Bitty Tea Party Rallies - YouTube[/ame]

.

.

 

[nitroz]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

 

[Pete7469]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

You bed wetters don't do anything "individually", you're nothing more than a gaggle of loud mouthed malcontents. The reason no one showed up for this even is because no one agrees with the bullshit propaganda "polls" your puppet masters told you was "the will of the people".

Furthermore if something isn't trendy or fashionable, pinko parasites can't be bothered to turn off the TV long enough to be bothered.

Clearly "the people" didn't want your stupid and pointless "background check" law, and for that matter just because people want something it doesn't mean they should get it.

I want $1 million a year salary to study clown fish off the coast of Borocay Island, I'll bet I could sign 50.1% of the voters for that deal. It doesn't mean we should get it.

 

[buckeye45_73]

LOL there were more media there than protestors, I wonder how many of the 10 people showed up had to be paid with union dues to waste their day

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

No YOU should be worried about the voters.

The voters are in favor of background checks. Guess what? We already have background checks.

Where's the outrage from the voters after the gun control bill was defeated.?

chirp.......chirp.......chirp.......chirp.......chirp....... crickets!

 

[buckeye45_73]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

Uh the liberal posters on this board do whatever the party says.....they dont disagree with anything the party says.......You're cute(well your profile photo is)......and hilarious.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

Newsflash!!!

We are not a democracy!

 

[tjvh]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

But you idiots won't stop at background checks, and rational people know that. It's why the gun Bill got shot down to begin with.

 

[Yurt]

Thats not a big deal. What you should be scared of is the voters.

The extended background checks was blocked because of the lobbyists.
The majority of voters were IN FAVOR of it.

legislation is not passed by voter polls

please educate yourself to our great nation's government

 

[Yurt]

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

Newsflash!!!

We are not a democracy!

nitard thinks we are fun by opinion polls

 

[aplcr0331]

Are people still quoting the 90% number brandied about by Obama? That was from a survey of 1,700 voters from Connecticut (Blue State), Penn (Blue State), NJ (Blue State), Florida (Blue State), Ohio (Blue State) and Virginia (Blue State) one month after Newtown. Bias much?

Here's the actual survey results that you can read for yourselves. Liberals, please do not read any of the portion of this survey about abortion. I repeat, do not read anything about abortion in this poll.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.pdf/

Jesus, for a group that claims to love science liberals have a real difficult time with numbers.

 

[OriginalShroom]

Is that the best the Left Wing Gun grabbers could do??

And we are supposed to be afraid of that?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Not scared. Unlike you liberal sheep, we aren't willing to give up our rights in order to win votes.

Us liberal sheep have individually agreed on something and voted on something, after assessing it.

We don't do it because the Democrats say it's what the cool kids do.
The votes are based on what the people want, which is democracy.


And allowing background checks is NOT giving up your rights.

But you idiots won't stop at background checks, and rational people know that. It's why the gun Bill got shot down to begin with.

BINGOOOOOO.....just like the homo movemnt and everything else...liberals are persistant....but you can when you have no job or responsibilities

 

[Yurt]

when the tea party has crowds of only a thousand or so....the libs/dems proclaim the end of the tea party and point out how those numbers mean the tea party means nothing

but....get only a hundred or so at one of their pet cause rallies and you get

silence of the libs

 

[jon_berzerk]

We really need to be concerned about these people, they're a threat to our rights and the collective intelligence of humanity.

Five sad pictures from today?s anti-NRA March | WashingtonExaminer.com

"A generous estimation of the crowd size would have been about 100 people, including members of the media."