Another Traitor Confirmed

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
There exists no photograph of Barack Taqiyya more putrid than this:

600x4262.jpg


WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 05: U.S. President Barack Obama (2nd L), former aide Samantha Power (R), U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice (2nd R) and incumbent National Security Adviser Tom Donilon (L) return to the Oval Office after a personnel announcement at the Rose Garden of the White House June 5, 2013 in Washington, DC. President Obama has nominated Rice to succeed Donilon to become the next National Security Adviser. Obama has also nominated Power to succeed Rice for her position to UN. Credit: Getty Images

Some of the Most Controversial Criticisms of America from the Woman Who Could Become Our Next U.N. Ambassador | TheBlaze.com

There exists no person in Barack Taqiyya’s administration more vile than Samantha Power. She is the only person that can make the others, past and present, look like flaming patriots. Power’s, who called Clinton a monster in 2008, even outdoes Hillary screeching her patriotism. Notice Hillary claiming the Right to disagree with Bush the Younger. That doesn’t square with Democrats using the IRS to punish conservatives who disagree with Barack Taqiyya’s policies:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJxmpTMGhU0&feature=player_embedded]I Am Sick And Tired - Hillary Clinton - YouTube[/ame]​

Here’s a sample of Power’s patriotism in action. She would not answer the question:

During a confirmation hearing Wednesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Rubio asked about a 2003 New Republic piece in which Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."

“Permitted” means the US military does not interfere in the internal affairs of foreign nations whenever bleeding heart liberals say they should.

The Florida Republican asked her to specify the crimes referred to in the article — and also asked which of the current administration's actions she would recommend for such a reckoning.

"I, as an immigrant to this country, think this country is the greatest country on earth, as I know you do," Ms. Power replied, who is from Ireland. "I would never apologize for America. America is the light to the world. We have freedoms and opportunities here that people dream about abroad. I certainly did."

XXXXX

Asked again which crimes to which she was referring, Ms. Power repeated that she believed the United States was the greatest country in the world and had nothing to apologize for.

Pressed again, she said: "I believe the United States is the greatest country on earth. I really do."

Power’s damn well better wrap herself in the flag. This is what she has to hide. It’s my emphasis in the second paragraph:

A member of the president's National Security Council who shares Noam Chomsky's foreign-policy goals? An influential presidential adviser whom 1960s revolutionary Tom Hayden treats as a fellow radical? A White House official who wrote a book aiming to turn an anti-American, anti-Israeli, Marxist-inspired, world-government-loving United Nations bureaucrat into a popular hero? Samantha Power, senior director of multilateral affairs for the National Security Council and perhaps the principal architect of our current intervention in Libya, is all of these things.

These scary-sounding tidbits might be dismissed as isolated “gotchas.” Unfortunately, when we view these radical outcroppings in the full sweep of her life's work, Samantha Power emerges as a patriot's nightmare—a woman determined to subordinate America's national sovereignty to an international order largely controlled by leftist bureaucrats. Superficially, Power's chief concern is to put a stop to genocide and “crimes against humanity.” More deeply, her goal is to use our shared horror at the worst that human beings can do in order to institute an ever-broadening regime of redistributive transnational governance.

April 5, 2011 4:00 A.M.
Samantha Power’s Power
On the ideology of an Obama adviser
By STANLEY KURTZ

Samantha Power?s Power | National Review Online

Put Power’s patriotism aside for a minute and she comes off as nothing more than another goddamned immigrant bum like Madeleine Albright and so many others who came to this country from a foreign shit hole. At some point after arriving they decide they are so morally superior they have the Right to tell Americans they have to go out and die in foreign lands for socialism’s ideology. When pressed to explain their views they all wrap themselves in the flag as Power’s did. Had I possessed Marco Rubio’s body for one minute I would have asked that lying douche bag why she doesn’t go back to Ireland and round up all of the drunks and send them out to die for her beliefs.

Note that Power’s started life as a journalist; so there is no chance the media will help defeat her confirmation:


The Yale and Harvard Law School graduate, who won a Pulitzer Prize for her work on the U.S. and foreign genocide, said one of the things that moved her was the U.S. response to genocide in Rwanda during the Clinton administration and President Clinton's open regret that he didn't do more.

Samantha Power, U.N. ambassador nominee, sidesteps questions on comments critical of U.S.
By David Sherfinski-
The Washington Times
Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Samantha Power, U.N. ambassador nominee, sidesteps questions on comments critical of U.S. - Washington Times

Work on US genocide? If nothing else she should be questioned until she explains that statement in full.

A Pulitzer Prize is no better than a Nobel Peace Prize. They are both prizes awarded to global government zealots by global government propagandists. Neither prize has meaning or value to most Americans.

And you can bet that Power’s will never get a prize from own kind by writing about the genocide done by Communist governments. Well over 100,000,000 dead by most counts.

Incidentally, I could not find out who paid for Power’s higher education. My quick research efforts did tell me that she has been a public trough parasite most of her adult life.

Power’s will be confirmed under the Golden Rule of Confirmations —— The president gets the people he wants. It matters not that Power’s is a shit-bum with no real love for this country’s sovereignty, nor does it matter what harm Power’s intends for the country she claims to love. The president wants her. The country can go to hell.

Parenthetically, Republicans already rolled over for Democrats on unconstitutional recess appointments; so there is every reason to believe that Power’s has already been confirmed in the back room. It would be a major blow to America’s independence when she is confirmed. Unfortunately, Democrats agree with her; so they are looking forward to her betrayals. Worse still, there will never be a day of reckoning for the senators who vote to confirm her and every other UN-loving traitor. There never is because most are gone by the time their betrayals come to fruition.

NOTE: Power’s will be working closely with another traitor —— John Kerry.

If you have the stomach for it you can find videos of her remarks. Throughout her testimony she employs double-talk advocating strengthening the United Nations. She repeatedly substitutes “US interests and US values” when she means her values. Rather strange values coming from an immigrant whose first loyalty is to the United Nations if you ask me.

In short: she is just another two-faced liar who will betray this country to the United Nations at every opportunity. The bloodiest lie of all is Power’s repeatedly skirting around her commitment to Americans dying for her sick beliefs under the guise of peacekeeping.

Finally, these two articles are for anybody that wants to get an accurate picture of Samantha Power:


06 June 2013 12:14 AM
Samantha Power and the UN are a perfect match

Samantha Power and the UN are a perfect match - Mail Online - Melanie Phillips's blog

XXXXX

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power
April 6, 2011 | Modified: March 16, 2012 at 7:26 am
Neil Hrab

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power | WashingtonExaminer.com
 
Last edited:
Samantha Power like her husband Cass Sunstein is as anti American as they get.
 
Samantha Power like her husband Cass Sunstein is as anti American as they get.

To Katzndogz: Right on. I sometimes refer to them as the Harvard Sunsteins. He recently returned to Harvard. I’m sure there is a berth waiting for her, too.

Let me quote myself on Harvard:


Journalism schools, film schools, etc., get tax dollars, too, and you see what they have produced. Worse still are schools for government; they are nothing but Socialist seminaries. Whenever I think of them I think of the plots in two 1964 movies; Failsafe and Dr. Strangelove. Both movies promote the Left’s favorite line of crapola. In both pictures a nuclear bomb is accidentally dropped on the USSR. In a show of good faith the American president makes a deal. The Soviets can bomb one American city in order to avert an all-out nuclear war.

My suggestion is to “accidentally” bomb the University of Tehran after Iran gets the bomb, then tell Iran’s leader he can bomb Harvard to even the score.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/education/258113-bombing-harvard-accidentally.html
 
It is a question of how much damage these liberals will do in the remainder of obama's term, and how badly will the well be poisoned for democrats running in 2014 and 2016?
 
Uncle Ferd sweet on her - he says her freckles give her 'oomph!"
:eusa_shifty:
‘OMG!’ – New Ambassador to the U.N. Gets Rock Star Reception in First Public Speech
August 12, 2013 -– Samantha Power, the youngest-ever U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, chose as an audience for her inaugural speech an organization of young activists who gave her a rock star welcome after she was introduced as “one of the most amazing women on earth.”
“OMG,” the 42 year-old began in response to the enthusiastic applause given to her at the Fourth Estate Leadership Summit at UCLA on Saturday. “Right back at ya.” Power, a former war reporter in the Balkans and foreign policy advisor to President Obama, was sworn in early this month, succeeding Susan Rice who moved from the New York post to become national security advisor. The gathering she addressed on Saturday night was organized by the advocacy group Invisible Children, which was established to document and expose atrocities carried out by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), an East Africa-based group notorious for mutilating and murdering civilians and forcing tens of thousands of abducted children to serve as soldiers or sex slaves.

Power, who won a Pulitzer Prize for a 2002 book examining the way the U.S. has responded to 20th century genocides, is an advocate for humanitarian intervention and the U.N.-backed concept known as “responsibility to protect.” Her nomination as ambassador drew criticism from a number of conservatives who were troubled by some of her past writing and statements. In her weekend speech at UCLA, Power recalled another conference in California, the April 1945 gathering in San Francisco that gave birth to the U.N. “That was 68 years ago,” she said. “Memories fade, bureaucracies are built. Positions become entrenched. And while the U.N. has done tremendous good in the world, there are times when the organization has lost its way, when politics and ideology get in the way of impact. Sometimes that sense of urgency and determination that existed at the start goes missing.”

aaa3_825.jpg

A casually-attired U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power present hers credentials to U.N.

Power encouraged her audience to “demand more of it [the U.N.], to make it work better, to build the world that we envision.” “Today, ordinary citizens don’t just advocate for change and action, they force change and take action themselves,” she said, pointing to the organization’s campaign against the LRA. The armed group and its leader, Joseph Kony, have been waging an bloody insurgency for more than two decades supposedly aimed at overthrowing the Ugandan government. The International Criminal Court wants Kony and other LRA commanders to face war crimes and crimes against humanity charges.

President George W. Bush in 2001 placed the LRA on the Terrorist Exclusion List, thereby presenting anyone associated with the group – which his administration described as “a barbaric rebel cult” – from visiting the U.S. In 2008, Kony was named a “specially designated global terrorist” under an executive order designed to disrupt funding to terrorists. In October 2011 Obama sent 100 U.S. troops to central Africa to advise regional armies in the fight against the LRA.

- See more at: ?OMG!? ? New Ambassador to the U.N. Gets Rock Star Reception in First Public Speech | CNS News
 
Anyone part of the obama regime is ultimately a traitor to the United States of America. That would be the United States of America that displays the Stars and Stripes as its flag not the gay rainbow flag.
 
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)
 
Last edited:
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)

OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.
 
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)

So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?

Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​
 
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)

OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.


So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?

Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​
 
Anyone part of the obama regime is ultimately a traitor to the United States of America. That would be the United States of America that displays the Stars and Stripes as its flag not the gay rainbow flag.

The gay rainbow flag? Why not make a factual statement and not simply one that is meant to rouse the emotions of the more hateful posters on this website. Not a single state in this country has been forced to legalize gay marriage or support gay marriage; each that has legalized gay marriage voted for it.

Also, I have no idea how every single person in Obama's administration is automatically classified as a traitor. Incompetent perhaps, but treasonous? Seems pretty far-fetched.
 
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)

OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.


So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?

Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​

I think it's a bit arrogant to assume that we, as a nation, have never made mistakes in terms of who we support. We used to be friends with Saddam Hussein in the 1980s (there's a picture of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with him). How about the dictatorial Shah of Iran in the 60s and 70s (there's a picture of JFK and his wife with Shah Pahlavi and his wife at a party). Or, the CIA-sponsored coup of the Iranian government in the early 1950s... the list goes on. Listen, I'm not an "America is always wrong guy", but there is nothing wrong with acknowledging mistakes. Look at Great Britain. They've recently decided to pay reparations to Kenyans who were the victim of British colonialism over a century ago.
 
Democrats are committed to the Detroitification of the USA

Of course they are. Liberals have always hated the USA. They have always wanted to bring it down to equal status with the third world.

What about liberals makes you think they hate America? If they hated America, why would they live here? They just have some inherent desire to burn this country to the ground? And what's this "third world" idea? Liberals, though not always smart or competent, have done nothing to actively TRY to turn this country into a third world country, and couldn't even if they wanted to.
 
I'm sorta amazed by all the off-topic, one-line zingers that are floating around this thread, like Democrats are just the root of all evil. I'm Independent, but I don't think either party is responsible for all the problems that go on in our country. Both bicker at eachother and blame eachother for everything and accomplish absolutely nothing. Just look at the track record of the current Congress, and the constant filibustering and witless bantering that go on daily. Politicians are politicians; simple as that.

My point about the one-liners being, if you want to have a debate about a topic (in this case, Samantha Power), go for it, but try to stay on topic and not just use it as a platform to bash your opposing party.

All that being said, I agree with a lot of you that the "bleeding-heart liberal" way of doing things is not the way to go. I don't like Samantha Power, but it's not because I think she hates America. That's ridiculous. I just think that she's over-anxious in terms of wanting the U.S. to intervene in every world conflict, and that her emotional decisions could get us into some trouble. She has a heart of absolute gold, but there comes a point when America (specifically the American military) can only do so much, and only SHOULD do so much.
 
^ :tinfoil:

Powers has written books on what the UN is "supposed" to do- get nations to co-exist alongside each other & intervene when human rights abuses/genocide is taking place.

OP is the male version of koshergrrl anyway ;)

OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.


So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?

Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​

Whatever it may be, it cannot compare to the evilness that is Cheney!
 
OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.


So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?

Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​

I think it's a bit arrogant to assume that we, as a nation, have never made mistakes in terms of who we support. We used to be friends with Saddam Hussein in the 1980s (there's a picture of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with him). How about the dictatorial Shah of Iran in the 60s and 70s (there's a picture of JFK and his wife with Shah Pahlavi and his wife at a party). Or, the CIA-sponsored coup of the Iranian government in the early 1950s... the list goes on. Listen, I'm not an "America is always wrong guy", but there is nothing wrong with acknowledging mistakes. Look at Great Britain. They've recently decided to pay reparations to Kenyans who were the victim of British colonialism over a century ago.

The treatment of the Native Americans in this nation is quite replete with criminal episodes on the part of our government and it's representatives. What we did to the Americans of Japanese ancestory during WW2 was also criminal. We are a nation composed of people, and as all people do, we do things that in retrospect are criminal to each other.

Then there was Blair Mountain and Ludlow, and so many other labor fights in which the government backed the corperations and businesses.
 
OP - Powers vile? I know no person more vile than Dick Cheney, yet conservatives thought so highly of him. They must not know the definition of vile.


So, what do you think the crimes were that she was too cowardly to elaborate on?
Ms. Power wrote that the United States needs "a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored, or permitted by the United States."​

I think it's a bit arrogant to assume that we, as a nation, have never made mistakes in terms of who we support. We used to be friends with Saddam Hussein in the 1980s (there's a picture of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with him). How about the dictatorial Shah of Iran in the 60s and 70s (there's a picture of JFK and his wife with Shah Pahlavi and his wife at a party). Or, the CIA-sponsored coup of the Iranian government in the early 1950s... the list goes on. Listen, I'm not an "America is always wrong guy", but there is nothing wrong with acknowledging mistakes. Look at Great Britain. They've recently decided to pay reparations to Kenyans who were the victim of British colonialism over a century ago.

I would tend to agree with those examples as mistakes...and so would most Americans.

Mistakes, not crimes.

So, the question remains, if those were the "crimes" she was refering to, why didn't she acknowledge them?


Pretty cowardly if you asked me...

Unless those were not the "crimes" she had in mind...which I find much more likely.
 

Forum List

Back
Top