Another questionable win for Jack Smith in appellate court.

[BackAgain]

Federal appeals court rejects petition over Special Counsel Jack Smith access to Trump's Twitter feed

A federal appeals court has rejected former President Trump’s request to block Special Counsel Jack Smith from accessing his then-Twitter feed as part of his election interference case.

www.foxnews.com

Seedy shit.

But, again, this is now ripe for review by a real court of law. The SCOTUS.

The famous old Chinese curse keeps springing to mind. “May you live in interesting times.”

These days are very interesting.

 

[White 6]

Federal appeals court rejects petition over Special Counsel Jack Smith access to Trump's Twitter feed

A federal appeals court has rejected former President Trump’s request to block Special Counsel Jack Smith from accessing his then-Twitter feed as part of his election interference case.

www.foxnews.com

Seedy shit.

But, again, this is now ripe for review by a real court of law. The SCOTUS.

The famous old Chinese curse keeps springing to mind. “May you live in interesting times.”

These days are very interesting.

Whatever he put on twitter is public domain and shown to the public already. Of course, trump lawyers failed to protect trump from trumps own words.

 

[skews13]

Whatever he put on twitter is public domain and shown to the public already. Of course, trump lawyers failed to protect trump from trumps own words.

 

[White 6]

View attachment 888900

Peter Marks may have it corrrect.

 

[jwoodie]

Whatever he put on twitter is public domain and shown to the public already. Of course, trump lawyers failed to protect trump from trumps own words.

If Twitter is public domain, why does Jack Smith need access? Isn't there a difference between personal opinions and public statements?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If Twitter is public domain, why does Jack Smith need access? Isn't there a difference between personal opinions and public statements?

not if you put them on a public website

 

[BackAgain]

Whatever he put on twitter is public domain and shown to the public already. Of course, trump lawyers failed to protect trump from trumps own words.

You missed the point. Skeevy Smith could have gotten it via a search warrant but didn’t want to tip off Trump. So he tried to get it via a mere subpoena on Twitter. Musk fought it. That tipped Smith’s hand.

I don’t know that it makes any sense for Musk to fight further.

But your claim about his lawyers have nothing to do with anything.

 

[jwoodie]

Actually, this ruling denies Trump's access to Jack Smith's Twitter search regarding this case. This may be a close call, since tweets can be cherry picked through selective search filters to conceal explanatory context.

 

[okfine]

Federal appeals court rejects petition over Special Counsel Jack Smith access to Trump's Twitter feed

A federal appeals court has rejected former President Trump’s request to block Special Counsel Jack Smith from accessing his then-Twitter feed as part of his election interference case.

www.foxnews.com

Seedy shit.

But, again, this is now ripe for review by a real court of law. The SCOTUS.

The famous old Chinese curse keeps springing to mind. “May you live in interesting times.”

These days are very interesting.

When was the last time Trump won in court? Good luck, bucko.

 

[BackAgain]

When was the last time Trump won in court? Good luck, bucko.

Zzz

Many times. But of course you wouldn’t have seen any.

 

[okfine]

Zzz

Many times. But of course you wouldn’t have seen any.

Which case was that?

 

[BackAgain]

Which case was that?

If you don’t know, why’d you make your claim?

 

[BackAgain]

If you don’t know, why’d you make your claim?

Most recent: Trump scores major win in civil suit

 

[okfine]

If you don’t know, why’d you make your claim?

BS. Your claim was "many" Go ahead and argue that or go away. Your choice.

 

[okfine]

Most recent: Trump scores major win in civil suit

Major? Give it up.

 

[BackAgain]

BS. Your claim was "many" Go ahead and argue that or go away. Your choice.

Your claim was the shit being denied.

You are a loser. And you last asked for “which case was that.” Note the singular.

Damn, gurrrl. You seriously can’t keep up even with your own bullshit.

 

[okfine]

Your claim was the shit being denied.

You are a loser. And you last asked for “which case was that.” Note the singular.

Damn, gurrrl. You seriously can’t keep up even with your own bullshit.

Yeah, sure bucko.

 

[BackAgain]

Yeah, sure bucko.

Your fail stands highlighted and underscored.

Feel free to hurry back and be exposed again as the simpleton you are — at your earliest convenience.

 

[okfine]

Your fail stands highlighted and underscored.

Feel free to hurry back and be exposed again as the simpleton you are — at your earliest convenience.

Trump loses 95% of his cases. Recently, Trump lost 2 cases on the same day.

I'll give you the one you found as a huge win for your inflated ego.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

When will Trump take a dive from Trump Tower? Before January 1?