Another Hint: Easier To Connect The Dots

[PoliticalChic]

1. WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is endorsing the Palestinians' demand for their future state to be based on the borders that existed before the 1967 Middle East war, in a move that will likely infuriate Israel. Israel says the borders of a Palestinian state have to be determined through negotiations.

Obama says Palestine must be based in 1967 borders - Yahoo! News



2. JERUSALEM – Weatherman terrorists Williams Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn – close associates for years of President Obama – were involved in provoking chaos on the streets of Egypt this week in an attempt to enter the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip to join in solidarity with the territory's population and leadership.

The protests were led in large part by Jodie Evans, co-founder of Code Pink, a far-left activist organization formed in 2002 to protest America's war in Iraq. The group previously met with Hamas and with leaders of the Taliban. Evans was a fundraiser and financial bundler for Obama's presidential campaign Ayers, Dohrn stir chaos in Middle East Ayers, Dohrn stir chaos in Middle East



3. How deep are the ties between the so-called antiwar group Code Pink and the terrorist group Hamas? Deep enough that Hamas guaranteed Code Pink’s safety when the group led an international delegation of anti-Israel leftists to Gaza in late December for the ‘Gaza Freedom March.’

Code Pink was co-founded by Jodie Evans, a top donor and fundraiser for President Barack Obama. Jodie Evans has maintained close ties with Obama and his administration throughout the first year of Obama’s term in office, including two visits to the White House in June just days after a previous Code Pink trip to Gaza where they were given a letter from Hamas to deliver to Obama. The White House visitor log below shows Jodie Evans’ name circled in red. » Hamas Terrorists Guaranteed Code Pink’s Safety in Gaza - Big Government



a. In a June 2008 radio interview, Evans expressed sympathy for the grievances that had prompted Osama bin Laden to order the 9/11 attacks: "We were attacked because we were in Saudi Arabia, that was the message of Osama, was that because we had our bases in the Middle East, he attacked the United States.” When the interviewer subsequently asked Evans whether she considered that "a valid argument," she replied: “Sure. Why do we have bases in the Middle East? We totally violated the rights of that country. Why do we get to have bases in the Middle East?” http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1628



b. , Evans squarely blamed Israel for Egypt's refusal to allow her group to cross en mass into Gaza.

"It’s obvious that the only reason for it is to make Israel happy. Israel is behind the refusal – what other excuse could there be?"

Earlier this week, WND reported Ayers was one of 431 academics to sign a petition calling for divestment, boycott and sanctions against Israel. Also signing the petition were Evans and Abunimah. Ayers, Dohrn stir chaos in Middle East Ayers, Dohrn stir chaos in Middle East



4. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQcQdWBqt14]YouTube - ‪Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany‬‏[/ame]


Easier, and easier to pick sides.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

unfuckingbelieveable!

 

[8537]

The 1967 borders?! What a great idea.

<this post brought to you by the previous two administrations, both of whom were clearly muslim-loving sumabiches.>

 

[JBeukema]

Why are we involved?

 

[daveman]

The correct, civilized, and honorable side to take is whichever one Code Pink and Bill Ayers don't.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why are we involved?

1. Israel kills Muslims for us.
2. Israel tests our weapon systems by killing Muslims for us.
3. AIPAC.

 

[Cal]

Jesusfuckingchrist.

 

[whitehall]

Why doesn't the UN demand that every country in the world move it's borders back to what they were in 1967 just to make it fair? The US could even set an example by giving California back to Mexico.

 

[Cal]

The 1967 borders?! What a great idea.

<this post brought to you by the previous two administrations, both of whom were clearly muslim-loving sumabiches.>

Ikr?

[...]

For some reason, the Beltway media is treating this as some kind of breaking news. Foreign Policy reported that Obama is altering U.S. policy and the Washington Post claimed that the Obama administration referred to the 1967 border as part of the solution “[f]or the first time.”

Next came the right-wing outrage that Obama hates Israel. Matt Drudge issued the marching orders soon after the speech ended with the headline, “Obama sides with Palestine.” Mitt Romney then accused Obama of “throwing Israel under the bus.” Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) said Obama “betrayed” Israel, saying on Twitter, “Obama’s call for 1967 borders will cause chaos, division & more aggression in Middle East & put Israel at further risk.” The far-right Simon Wiesenthal Center, which purports to promote tolerance, basically called Obama a Nazi, saying that “Israel should reject a return to 1967 ‘Auschwitz’ borders.”

But the problem is that this just isn’t new. Even President Bush in 2005 endorsed a two-state solution with negotiations based on the post-1949 Armistice, pre-1967 borders:

Any final status agreement must be reached between the two parties, and changes to the 1949 Armistice lines must be mutually agreed to. A viable two-state solution must ensure contiguity of the West Bank, and a state of scattered territories will not work.

Wonk Room » Obama&#8217;s Call For Israeli & Palestinian Borders To Be &#8216;Based On The 1967 Lines&#8217; Mirrors Bush, Clinton Policy

.. PC just can't be taken seriously.

 

[Ernie S.]

Why are we involved?

1. Israel kills Muslims for us.
2. Israel tests our weapon systems by killing Muslims for us.
3. AIPAC.

Sounds like a win/win to me.