Another False Accusation, It Never Ends, This Is How Hx Is Rewrote.

Kondor3, Pennywise, et al,

In reference to the descriptive analogy of the "victim" in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, it does NOT refer to a people subjected to terrible acts, such as a natural disaster, crime, war, etc --- but rather to a people who avoid responsibility by blaming others when faced with the consequences of their action. It is the case where the Palestinian would rather NOT deal with the shame or guilt of adverse outcomes of past political, military or economic trauma, --- and would rather project the psychological manifestations which places the blame for failures on others for their current situation.

The victim psychology has paralyzed the Arab Palestinian and prevent them from making logical decisions --- being caught up in their perception of how unfair a situation is, a people and culture unable to think of ways or actions that could solve the problem. They instead --- present arguments to further accusations of blame, which are generally helpful to no one.

Arab Palestinian self-victimization (victim role play) do so for various reasons.

Although they can actually change circumstances to avoid being victimized, Arab Palestinian won’t seize the opportunities because they want to play the role and appear as victims to others and themselves.

  • The Arab Palestinians tend to manipulate or abuse others verbally or physically (thru propaganda, conflict and terrorism), but then blame the other person (i.e. the real victim) for provoking the abuse.
  • They influence or control eternal and international sympathy to gain compassion or support (thru propaganda, conflict and terrorism).
  • The Arab Palestinians form friendships or intimate relationships with those who disrespect, mistreat or abuse them to convince themselves and the world of their unfortunate status (Fatah and PLO recognition in the UN).
  • The Arab Palestinians tend to avoid taking responsibility for their cultural development of their nation, instead blaming Israel for their mistreatment or unfortunate circumstances when cutoff from Israel.
The Jew is never at fault. They are always a victim.
Doesn't matter... they've been the victim often enough in the past 2000 years to get an occasional 'pass' here and there.
(COMMENT)

Israelis and Palestinians have failed to reach a final peace agreement. (Rhetorical: "Why")

While many observers focus on what they think are the remaining key issues are, the central issue that is the hub of this spoke and wheel configuration are missed:
The hub is, of course, expressed more than half a century ago, and reiterated over and over again in differing forms, has the same central theme (1948).

  • (a) The Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them.

    (b) The Arabs of Palestine consider that any attempt by the Jews or any power group of powers to establish a Jewish state in Arab territory is an act of aggression which will be resisted in self-defense.
In this we see, has the same central theme:
  • 1968: (20 years Later)
    • Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people; it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland, and the Palestinian people are an integral part of the Arab nation.
    • Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit.
  • 2013: (40 years Later)
    • Palestine from the river to the sea, and from north to south, is a land of the Palestinian people and its homeland and its legitimate right, we may not a waiver an inch or any part thereof, no matter what the reasons and circumstances and pressures.
    • Palestine - all of Palestine - is a land of Islamic and Arab affiliation, a blessed sacred land, that has a major portion in the heart of every Arab and Muslim.
And this center theme contends that the "the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom. They consider that imposing international alien immigrants on their country by force is nothing but an act of aggression and invasion, whether made by Jews themselves, through Great Britain, or by the United Nations. The Arab Higher Committee Delegation therefore expects that the duty of the United Nations is to remove the said aggression and stop that invasion. The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination." Here is where you see the stark beginnings of the "Arab Palestinians" projection of their policy of "self-victimization." Everyone is at fault, but them.

(SOLUTION)
  • Administer all Arab Palestinians 200mg --- twice daily --- of Thorazine (Chlorpromazine) for the treat pandemic psychotic disorder, manic-depression, and severe behavioral problems.
Most Respectfully,
R
 
Tory Chief Whip Michael Gove has compared the campaign to boycott Israeli goods with the first stages of the Nazi move against Jews in the 1930s.

Speaking at the Holocaust Educational Trust annual dinner on Tuesday, Mr Gove said:
"We need to remind people that what began with a campaign against Jewish goods in the past ended with a campaign against Jewish lives. We need to spell out that this sort of prejudice starts with the Jews but never ends with the Jews."
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/122480/boycott-recalls-nazism-says-gove


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_boycott_of_German_goods
The Jewish boycott of German goods refers to one of the international Jewish responses to the policies of the Nazis.
The boycott started in March 1933 in both Europe and the US.[2] Sources claim it continued until the entry of the US into the war.[3]
Both the Nazis and some outside Germany saw the boycott as an act of aggression, with the UK newspaper the Daily Express going so far as to put as headline: "Judea Declares War on Germany".[2]
The Nazi regime protested internationally and on April 1, 1933, organized a (one day) boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany,[2] which was the first of official anti-Jewish acts by the German government.
The Haavara Agreement, together with lessened dependence on trade with the West, had by 1937 largely negated the effects of the Jewish boycott on Germany.[4] According to a December 1936 article in Time, the Association of German National Jews was then fighting against the Jewish boycott of German goods


Why only botcotting "goods"? unless they boycott anything Israeli, including medicine, books, technology etc., they're a bunch of hypocrites, all of them. Let them boycott anything "Jewish", including shops, facebook, sites.... because many Jews "support" the apartheid.

What.... no?

Just like I thought.
 
The Jew is never at fault. They are always a victim.
Doesn't matter... they've been the victim often enough in the past 2000 years to get an occasional 'pass' here and there.

Read A People That Shall Dwell Alone Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy with Diaspora Peoples Kevin MacDonald 9780595228386 Amazon.com Books

Isn't there a Holocaust thread sonewhere where you can go and mock the suffering of people?
 
Tory Chief Whip Michael Gove has compared the campaign to boycott Israeli goods with the first stages of the Nazi move against Jews in the 1930s.

Speaking at the Holocaust Educational Trust annual dinner on Tuesday, Mr Gove said:
"We need to remind people that what began with a campaign against Jewish goods in the past ended with a campaign against Jewish lives. We need to spell out that this sort of prejudice starts with the Jews but never ends with the Jews."
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/122480/boycott-recalls-nazism-says-gove


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_boycott_of_German_goods
The Jewish boycott of German goods refers to one of the international Jewish responses to the policies of the Nazis.
The boycott started in March 1933 in both Europe and the US.[2] Sources claim it continued until the entry of the US into the war.[3]
Both the Nazis and some outside Germany saw the boycott as an act of aggression, with the UK newspaper the Daily Express going so far as to put as headline: "Judea Declares War on Germany".[2]
The Nazi regime protested internationally and on April 1, 1933, organized a (one day) boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany,[2] which was the first of official anti-Jewish acts by the German government.
The Haavara Agreement, together with lessened dependence on trade with the West, had by 1937 largely negated the effects of the Jewish boycott on Germany.[4] According to a December 1936 article in Time, the Association of German National Jews was then fighting against the Jewish boycott of German goods


Why only botcotting "goods"? unless they boycott anything Israeli, including medicine, books, technology etc., they're a bunch of hypocrites, all of them. Let them boycott anything "Jewish", including shops, facebook, sites.... because many Jews "support" the apartheid.

What.... no?

Just like I thought.

The point of the article is his omission and distortion of facts.
 
The Jew is never at fault. They are always a victim.
Doesn't matter... they've been the victim often enough in the past 2000 years to get an occasional 'pass' here and there.

Read A People That Shall Dwell Alone Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy with Diaspora Peoples Kevin MacDonald 9780595228386 Amazon.com Books

Kevin Mc Donald is an anti semitic asshole that has been debunked and exposed publicly, even more so that you. Perhaps your favorite neo Nazi websites would be more receptive to this garbage you just posted?
 
The Jew is never at fault. They are always a victim.
Doesn't matter... they've been the victim often enough in the past 2000 years to get an occasional 'pass' here and there.

Read A People That Shall Dwell Alone Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy with Diaspora Peoples Kevin MacDonald 9780595228386 Amazon.com Books

Kevin Mc Donald is an anti semitic asshole that has been debunked and exposed publicly, even more so that you. Perhaps your favorite neo Nazi websites would be more receptive to this garbage you just posted?

He's a genius unafraid of guttersnipe chimps, like you. Thank the lawd for teacher tenure.
 
The Jew is never at fault. They are always a victim.
Doesn't matter... they've been the victim often enough in the past 2000 years to get an occasional 'pass' here and there.

Read A People That Shall Dwell Alone Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy with Diaspora Peoples Kevin MacDonald 9780595228386 Amazon.com Books

Kevin Mc Donald is an anti semitic asshole that has been debunked and exposed publicly, even more so that you. Perhaps your favorite neo Nazi websites would be more receptive to this garbage you just posted?

He's a genius unafraid of guttersnipe chimps, like you. Thank the lawd for teacher tenure.

yeah yeah yeah, he's dirtbag looser anti semite like you are, who has no fucking business espousing opinions on Jews or Israel. But of course you would call this waste of oxygen a "genius". In most neo Nazi circles, I bet frauds like McDonald usually are:

Kevin B. MacDonald (born January 24, 1944) is an American professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach (CSULB), best known for his use of evolutionary theory to support his claim that Judaism is a "group evolutionary strategy."

The university's psychology department, as well as the Cal State Long Beach academic senate, have voted to formally dissociate themselves from his work in 2008.

MacDonald has also been accused of employing scapegoating techniques that resemble classical Nazism.[22] Steven Pinker, while acknowledging that he had "not plowed through MacDonald's trilogy and therefore run the complementary risks of being unfair to his arguments, and of not refuting them resoundingly enough to distance them from my own views on evolutionary psychology", states that MacDonald's theses are unable to pass the threshold of attention-worthiness or peer-approval, and contain a "consistently invidious portrayal of Jews, couched in value-laden, disparaging language."[23] Reviewing MacDonald’s A People That Shall Dwell Alone, Sander Gilman describes MacDonald's argument about a Jewish group evolutionary strategy as a "bizarre" one which "recasts all of the hoary old myths about Jewish psychological difference and its presumed link to Jewish superior intelligence in contemporary sociobiological garb."[24] Eugen Schoenfeld states the book contains "sloppy scholarship" and that MacDonald's comparison of Jewish collectivism during the biblical period with eighteenth- and nineteenth-century English individualism "indicates a total ignorance of the impact of industrialization on Western societies."[

John Hartung, an anesthetist and theorist of human behavioral ecology, at first interested in his work, said MacDonald's The Culture of Critique was "quite disturbing, seriously misinformed about evolutionary genetics, and suffering from a huge blind spot about the nature of Christianity."[26]

MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth. He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald's use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[28]

Reviewing MacDonald's Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as "provoked by Jews themselves." Garber concludes that MacDonald's "rambling who-is-who-isn't roundup of Jews responsible for the 'Jewish Problem' borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation."[29]

Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving's Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary's failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, "The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females." Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, "(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, "Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females."[31]

Criticism by the ADL and the SPLC
Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an institute that monitors neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups, has said of MacDonald that "he put the anti-Semitism under the guise of scholarly work... Kevin MacDonald’s work is nothing but gussied-up anti-Semitism. At base it says that Jews are out to get us through their agenda ... His work is bandied about by just about every neo-Nazi group in America."

The Anti-Defamation League has included MacDonald in its list of American extremists, Extremism in America, and written a report on MacDonald's views and ties. According to the ADL, MacDonald's views on Jews mimic those of anti-Semites from the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
 
Wow a Cut and Paste from the SPLC. Go fuck yourself, Roudy. You and the Zionist pigs at the ADL will never obscure the truth.

That you have the nerve to post ADL quotes is fucking HIGH-larious. Sourcing the pinnacle of "non agenda" propaganda. Laughable, like your race.
 
Wow a Cut and Paste from the SPLC. Go fuck yourself, Roudy. You and the Zionist pigs at the ADL will never obscure the truth.

That you have the nerve to post ADL quotes is fucking HIGH-larious. Sourcing the pinnacle of "non agenda" propaganda. Laughable, like your race.

Wake up Dollardumb Nazi boy! His own university, many historians, and just about every legitimate civil and human rights organization have denounced McDonald. Your "source" just got demolished.
 

Forum List

Back
Top