Liability
Locked Account.
Ridiculously unnecessary action. Big Brother just keeps gettting bigger. How sad.
Vapid dopey ^ Paulian post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ridiculously unnecessary action. Big Brother just keeps gettting bigger. How sad.
We'll just have to agree to disagree, I hope I am wrong I just don't see it that way though.
Ok. But the words in the EO say what they actually say. So, I don't see how you can read them any other way.
You're still ok in my book, even if I did speak abrasively to you.
I'm feeling a little guilty at the moment and a little contrite.
Sorry.
But the words in the EO say what they actually say. So, I don't see how you can read them any other way.
I have a strong sense of perception. I pick up on things that others miss.
Maybe you read it wrong. As I said I have a strong sense of perception at least since my death back in 85Ok. But the words in the EO say what they actually say. So, I don't see how you can read them any other way.
You're still ok in my book, even if I did speak abrasively to you.
I'm feeling a little guilty at the moment and a little contrite.
Sorry.
But the words in the EO say what they actually say. So, I don't see how you can read them any other way.
I have a strong sense of perception. I pick up on things that others miss.
Not in this case. You read into shit that isn't there.
Maybe you read it wrong.I have a strong sense of perception. I pick up on things that others miss.
Not in this case. You read into shit that isn't there.
Maybe you read it wrong.Not in this case. You read into shit that isn't there.
Nope. I read it correctly and, unlike some folks, I didn't add words to it or pretend that the words that ARE there have alternative meanings.
Maybe you read it wrong.
Nope. I read it correctly and, unlike some folks, I didn't add words to it or pretend that the words that ARE there have alternative meanings.
As I said I have a strong sense of perception at least since my death back in 85
Nope. I read it correctly and, unlike some folks, I didn't add words to it or pretend that the words that ARE there have alternative meanings.
As I said I have a strong sense of perception at least since my death back in 85
Your strong sense of perception is no substitute (obviously) for reality.
The thing says what it says. No more.
Every time I die, I keep coming back.
As I said I have a strong sense of perception at least since my death back in 85
Your strong sense of perception is no substitute (obviously) for reality.
The thing says what it says. No more.
Every time I die, I keep coming back.
It opens the door for more government take over.
So is it your opinion that the government can take over the private sector in the name of national security?
Your strong sense of perception is no substitute (obviously) for reality.
The thing says what it says. No more.
Every time I die, I keep coming back.
It opens the door for more government take over.
Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
So is it your opinion that the government can take over the private sector in the name of national security?
Since that "question" requires acceptance of your false premise, the "question" is meaningless.
Since that "question" requires acceptance of your false premise, the "question" is meaningless.
Is it acceptable to you for the government to take control of the private sector for national security? After all that's exactly what this executive order does, in the name of national security.Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
No. It doesn't require a simple yes or no. YOUR question had been "So is it your opinion ...."It opens the door for more government take over.
Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
Since that "question" requires acceptance of your false premise, the "question" is meaningless.
Since that "question" requires acceptance of your false premise, the "question" is meaningless.
It requires a simple yes or no answer. In your opinion is it acceptable for the government to take over the private sector in the name of national security?
Is it acceptable to you for the government to take control of the private sector for national security? After all that's exactly what this executive order does, in the name of national security.Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
No. It doesn't require a simple yes or no. YOUR question had been "So is it your opinion ...."Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
Since that "question" requires acceptance of your false premise, the "question" is meaningless.
It requires a simple yes or no answer. In your opinion is it acceptable for the government to take over the private sector in the name of national security?
Is it acceptable to you for the government to take control of the private sector for national security? After all that's exactly what this executive order does, in the name of national security.Because you say so? You can point to not one actual provision of the EO that opens any such door (excepting by reference to your somewhat paranoid type imagination).
The "so" was a tell.
It was your suppressed premise. (What it means is that you are asking a very stilted question "AS a consequence of my prior premise, does it follow that ....?")
Since your original premise was a false premise, nothing logically follows from it.
Ridiculously unnecessary action. Big Brother just keeps gettting bigger. How sad.
Vapid dopey ^ Paulian post.