Another example of Government mis-leading us

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Oldandtired, Oct 26, 2009.

  1. Oldandtired
    Offline

    Oldandtired BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,618
    Thanks Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island
    Ratings:
    +349
    Harry "the war is lost" Reid announced today that he will be submitting a plan to the CBO for rating. In that plan they will INCLUDE the public option.

    However, he said states will have the right to "opt out" of the public option.

    Does anyone know what the difference between "opt out" and "opt in" is?

    When you "opt in" you pay for it.
    When you "opt out" you dont get it, but you pay for it anyway.

    So I am curious...with this "opt out" scenario.....exactly what states will opt out if their residents will need to pay "their share" of the tax anyway?

    And exactly what future will a politician in that state have if he/she votes to "opt out" yet the residents will NOT see a positive change in their tax liability compared to a resident of a state that does NOT opt out?

    Smoke and mirrors.
     
  2. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    It will be a good day when voters opt out of Harry.
     

Share This Page