- Banned
- #21
Remember the 'gutsy call' propaganda about how it was 50/50 whether Osama was even at the compound?
I just watched a clip of Hillary Clinton talking about how the Dr. Shakil Afridi helped to identify Osama's presence at his compound via DNA.
Wait a second? If we confirmed his DNA then how was it 50/50? And this DNA evidence wasn't part of the propaganda videos they've been releasing.
It's sad that Obama lies so much that his own administration can't keep track of how their own releases confound prior lies.
And on a side note; Obama once again sloppily used a foreigner's help and then made no efforts to keep him out of the trouble. That man is now serving a 33 year term.
I don't get what your complain is? One side is that Obama took a risk going into a place that might not have had Osama in it, and the other is that Obama did his research to insure that he had the best opportunity to catch him? Are we supposed to be bothered obama went in there when he possibly knew it was more likely than 50/50 he was there? Are we supposed to be bothered that he might have been more careful than the media portrayed? besides those are some damned good odds considering the odds there were WMDs in a country we bankrupted and were continually poking our nose into.