Ann Coulter On Media's Breitbart Smears...

[bripat9643]

Wiener caught himself. He's a dick (like warrior) . The others were destroyed by edited tapes and lies. Sherrod will one day own biggovernment.com.

When you're capable of admitting the truth, perhaps I'll bother with a substantive response. Until that time, it's utterly pointless to debate you.

Who expects a debate from a moroonie/loonie toony like you?

I already told you that you're a dishonest moron. When you can admit the truth. then perhaps I'll bother with a substantive response. Until that time, expect nothing from me but verbal abuse.

 

[BlindBoo]

Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

No doubt you spoke ill of Edward Murrow when he died. After all, Murrow altered the news that America was privileged to for 30 years. Not just altering clips, but entire stories.

Or was that different, since he promoted leftism?

Yes there is such an equivlence between Edward R. Murrow and Breitbart.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gJlOz7bVb0]Andrew Breitbart Freaks Out At Protesters - YouTube[/ame]

I bet it was an aneurysm.

 

[BlindBoo]

When you're capable of admitting the truth, perhaps I'll bother with a substantive response. Until that time, it's utterly pointless to debate you.

Who expects a debate from a moroonie/loonie toony like you?

I already told you that you're a dishonest moron. When you can admit the truth. then perhaps I'll bother with a substantive response. Until that time, expect nothing from me but verbal abuse.

WTF are you talking about. All you ever do is abuse everyone who dares disagree with the rabid rightie tightie agenda and daily taking point.

Hahaha. You and truth are mortal emenies.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes there is such an equivlence between Edward R. Murrow and Breitbart.

I didn't say there was.

Now there was a level of equivalence between Ed Murrow and Josef Goebbels, that is true..

 

[Uncensored2008]

WTF are you talking about. All you ever do is abuse everyone who dares disagree with the rabid rightie tightie agenda and daily taking point.

Hahaha. You and truth are mortal emenies.

If that were true, how would you possibly know?

You and the truth are certainly not acquainted with one another.

 

[BlindBoo]

Say sparky;

Is there a name to describe those who seek to have the means of production controlled by the state? You know, the way Mussolini and Hitler controlled it?

Some sort of name or label?

Ummm... Progressives?

Liberal, Progressive, fascist, Nazi, communist - it's all the same thing. Expand the state at the expense of the individual - turn us all into groveling serfs.

You forgot the GOP

 

[GuyPinestra]

Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

"I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives."

But no, the rabid right wants to draw an equilence to a man who served in the Senate with distinction with this guy.

Not going to happen.

Please provide some proof that the video Breitbart posted was "selectively edited". Here is the video posted and it's accompanied blog post.

In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_xCeItxbQY&feature=player_embedded]NAACP Bigotry in their ranks - YouTube[/ame]

OK Plasticballs and BlindBoob, I'll give you ANOTHER chance to show us where Breitbart edited this video. If you think I won't keep reposting this you're wrong. You made the accusation, now please back it up.

 

[BlindBoo]

Fascism, said one of its leading spokesmen, Alfredo Rocco, stresses:


...the necessity, for which the older doctrines make little allowance, of sacrifice, even up to the total immolation of individuals, on behalf of society... For Liberalism (i.e., individualism), the individual is the end and society the means; nor is it conceivable that the individual, considered in the dignity of an ultimate finality, be lowered to mere instrumentality. For Fascism, society is the end, individuals the means, and its whole life consists in using individuals as instruments for its social ends.


"The higher interests involved in the life of the whole," said Hitler in a 1933 speech, "must here set the limits and lay down the duties of the interests of the individual." Men, echoed the Nazis, have to "realize that the State is more important than the individual, that individuals must be willing and ready to sacrifice themselves for Nation and Fuhrer." The people, said the Nazis, "form a true organism," a "living unity", whose cells are individual persons. In reality, therefore -- appearances to the contrary notwithstanding -- there is no such thing as an "isolated individual" or an autonomous man.


Just as the individual is to be regarded merely as a fragment of the group, the Nazis said, so his possessions are to be regarded as a fragment of the group's wealth.


"Private property" as conceived under the liberalistic economy order was a reversal of the true concept of property [wrote Huber]. This "private property" represented the right of the individual to manage and to speculate with inherited or acquired property as he pleased, without regard for the general interests... German socialism had to overcome this "private", that is, unrestrained and irresponsible view of property. All property is common property. The owner is bound by the people and the Reich to the responsible management of his goods. His legal position is only justified when he satisfies this responsibility to the community.


Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation's economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of CONTROL. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property -- so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property.


If "ownership" means the right to determine the use and disposal of material goods, then Nazism endowed the state with every real prerogative of ownership. What the individual retained was merely a formal deed, a content-less deed, which conferred no rights on its holder. Under communism, there is collective ownership of property DEJURE. Under Nazism, there is the same collective ownership DE FACTO.

During the Hitler years -- in order to finance the party's programs, including the war expenditures -- every social group in Germany was mercilessly exploited and drained. White-collar salaries and the earnings of small businessmen were deliberately held down by government controls, freezes, taxes. Big business was bled by taxes and "special contributions" of every kind, and strangled by the bureaucracy. At the same time the income of the farmers was held down, and there was a desperate flight to the cities -- where the middle class, especially the small tradesmen, were soon in desperate straits, and where the workers were forced to labor at low wages for increasingly longer hours (up to 60 or more per week).


But the Nazis defended their policies, and the country did not rebel; it accepted the Nazi argument. Selfish individuals may be unhappy, the Nazis said, but what we have established in Germany is the ideal system, SOCIALISM. In its Nazi usage this term is not restricted to a theory of economics; it is to be understood in a fundamental sense. "Socialism" for the Nazis denotes the principle of collectivism as such and its corollary, statism -- in every field of human action, including but not limited to economics.


"To be a socialist", says Goebbels, "is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole."By this definition, the Nazis practiced what they preached. They practiced it at home and then abroad. No one can claim that they did not sacrifice enough individuals.


Excerpted from Chapter 1 of THE OMINOUS PARALLELS, by Leonard Peikoff... most probably the most important book written in modern times.

Socialism = NAZI (Hitler was a socialist)

ROTFLMAO

Yeah socialism for the pure Aryian Germans. Everyone else should eat dirt.

 

[BlindBoo]

Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

"I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives."

But no, the rabid right wants to draw an equilence to a man who served in the Senate with distinction with this guy.

Not going to happen.

Please provide some proof that the video Breitbart posted was "selectively edited". Here is the video posted and it's accompanied blog post.

In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_xCeItxbQY&feature=player_embedded]NAACP Bigotry in their ranks - YouTube[/ame]

OK Plasticballs and BlindBoob, I'll give you ANOTHER chance to show us where Breitbart edited this video. If you think I won't keep reposting this you're wrong. You made the accusation, now please back it up.

First off I didn't say he edited the clip, I said he aired it. Second, one only has to watch the first 20 seconds to know it's edited to produce a reaction. What were those lines and who inserted them in the video? So there you go bucky.......

The entire video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk]Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video - YouTube[/ame]

 

[GuyPinestra]

Wiener caught himself. He's a dick (like warrior) . The others were destroyed by edited tapes and lies. Sherrod will one day own biggovernment.com.

You didn't say he edited them?? REALLY??

 

[BlindBoo]

Wiener caught himself. He's a dick (like warrior) . The others were destroyed by edited tapes and lies. Sherrod will one day own biggovernment.com.

You didn't say he edited them?? REALLY??

The written language is precise. No I don't recall saying Andy edited them. I said he aired them. Of course I could be wrong, perhap I made a mistake.....

 

[bripat9643]

Ummm... Progressives?

Liberal, Progressive, fascist, Nazi, communist - it's all the same thing. Expand the state at the expense of the individual - turn us all into groveling serfs.

You forgot the GOP

No I didn't. Those who favor smaller government are not in the same class as the advocates of bigger government, that is liberals, progressives, fascists, Nazis and communists.

 

[bripat9643]

ROTFLMAO

Yeah socialism for the pure Aryian Germans. Everyone else should eat dirt.

Sort of like the way all of Obama's pals get bailouts and exemptions from Obamacare, but the rest of us have to pound sand?

 

[bripat9643]

Wiener caught himself. He's a dick (like warrior) . The others were destroyed by edited tapes and lies. Sherrod will one day own biggovernment.com.

You didn't say he edited them?? REALLY??

The written language is precise. No I don't recall saying Andy edited them. I said he aired them. Of course I could be wrong, perhap I made a mistake.....

You really are a despicable lying moron.

Who do you think you're fooling?

 

[Listening]

Did we ever hear about the Coulter/O'Donnell debate ?

While I like Ann, I don't take her to seriously.

O'Donnell is a better preacher than Al Sharpton. But his basis for argument has no place in the reality he keeps claiming the right is missing.

Any news.

Synthaholic ?