and you thought our preachers were bad?

nbdysfu

Member
Nov 17, 2003
829
29
16
Acid attack on boy who 'refused sex with Muslim cleric'
By Massoud Ansari in Karachi
(Filed: 08/02/2004)

On his hospital bed last week, 16-year-old Abid Tanoli sat listless and alone, half of his body covered by burns that all but destroyed both his eyes and left his face horribly disfigured.

The teenager talked, with difficulty, of how his life had been destroyed since the fateful day in June 2002 when he refused to have sex with his teacher at a religious school in Pakistan.

The boy was horrifically injured in an acid attack after he rebuffed the Muslim cleric's sexual advances. Now, he has alarmed Pakistan's powerful religious establishment by pressing charges against his alleged assailants.

...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...k108.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/02/08/ixworld.html
 
I really dread to think what must go on in some of the "religious schools" in Pakistan. The mullah's have absolute power on what goes on and IMO some of them can be utterly sick bastards.

No controls are in place and no checks are carried out. Again IMO 99.99% of anything untoward is brushed under the carpet and the SOB's carry on as usual. In most cases the victim gets accused of telling total lies and fabricating the whole thing.
 
For the record, Catholic priests, Jewish rabbis and now, it appears, Muslim clerics, are all on record as having a taste for little boys. Michael Jackson, too.

Is it just me, or is Nicole Kidman a lot hotter?
 
Qur'an has rewards for suicide martyrs with Muhammad in paradise. Sinless pedophilic homosexual contact with little boys for eternity. This is from their own Qur'an bible and you can look up the verses at the followsing Islamic site for yourself.

http://www.islamicity.com/

The Mount
52:23 They shall there exchange, one with another, a (loving) cup free of frivolity, free of all taint of SIN.


The Mount
52:24 Round about them will serve, (devoted) to them. Boys (handsome) as Pearls well-guarded.


The Mount
52:25 They will advance to each other, engaging in mutual enquiry.

===============================

Time, Man, (every) Man, This (day-and-)age
76:19 And round about them will (serve) BOYS of perpetual (freshness): If thou seest them, thou wouldst think them scattered Pearls.


Time, Man, (every) Man, This (day-and-)age
76:20 And when thou lookest, it is there thou wilt see a Bliss and a Realm Magnificent.
 
As always religious text is open to numerous interpretations but in this particular case extremely few Muslims would accept the one you are putting forward.

I’m the first one to admit that Islam has major major problems to resolve but promoting or even condoning paedophilia is not one of them. It is abhorrent to the average Muslim just as much as it is to individuals of any other faith.
 
Originally posted by Sabir
As always religious text is open to numerous interpretations but in this particular case extremely few Muslims would accept the one you are putting forward.

I am putting forward nothing more than the Islamic verses from Qur'an as interpreted by Muslims. Have you any other interpretation for these verses?

I’m the first one to admit that Islam has major major problems to resolve but promoting or even condoning paedophilia is not one of them. It is abhorrent to the average Muslim just as much as it is to individuals of any other faith.

What major problems do you admit that Islam has to resolve? According to the Qur'an, Allah's wills everything and nothing can happen without his will. Please explain:

http://www.islamic-paths.org/Home/English/Muhammad/Other/Pedophile.htm

The following permutation of the prophet Muhammad's marriage to the 9 year old child Aisha Siddiqa....

Does the Prophet fit the above criteria of a pedophile?

With the above criteria of a pedophile in mind, lets analyze the lifestyle of the prophet and his marriages.

Name of Bride Bride’s age at marriage Comments
Khadija bint khawilad 40 Twice widowed before
Sauda Bint Zama 50 Widow
Aisha bint Abu Bakr 9 Started living with the prophet at the age of 9.
Hafsa Bint Umar bin Khattab 22 Widow
Zainab bint Khuzaima 30
Umm-I-Salma bint Abu Umayia 26 Widow
Zainab Bint Jahash 38 Widow
Juwaeria Bint Harith 20 Widow
Umm-I-Habiba bint Abu Sufyan 36 Widow
Marya Qibtiya bint shamun 17 Virgin, Egyptian
Safia bint Hayi bin Akhtab 17 Widow
Raihana bint umru bin hanafa Not available
Maimuna bint harith 36 Widow


Source: The Prophet of Islam, the Ideal Husband, by Syed Abu Zafar Zain, Kazi Publications, Lahore, Ist Ed., pg. 10-12

Statistics from the above table:
Percentage of his wives who were 17 years and older = 91 %

Percentage of his wives who were widows = 75%


Comment: The statistics show that the prophet’s marriage to Aisha at her young age was an exception and not a norm of his other marriages. Furthermore ‘a pedophile’s main mode of sexual satisfaction is with prepubescent girls’, which is contradictory to the 91% of prophet’s marriage to women 17 years and over. An unbiased examination of Prophet’s life and his marriages to his wives blatantly rejects the notion of his lifestyle fitting that of a pedophile. All his brides were aged widows (except Aisha and Marium).

Moreover, according to the criteria in the references cited above in ‘Synopsis of Psychiatry’, a vast majority of pedophiles possess a history of exhibitionism, voyeurism, or rape. Again, there is no single reference from either religious or secular sources that the noble Prophet ever indulged in such sadistic behavior (God forbid). This truth is observed and accepted by both Muslims and unbiased non-Muslims scholars.
 
you forgot to mention sahih muslim book 8 chapter 22 mohammad did approve of rape for his followers so you are lying.as far as pedophilia what about the hadith where he asks one of his followers why he didn't marry a young girl so he could play with her and then he said they needed to wait till sundown so the women would have time to shave there pubic hair..you also point to the fact since he just did it once(married but we don't know for sure how many others outside of marriage he had sex with)doesn't make it right.
 
Originally posted by cptpwichita

you forgot to mention sahih muslim book 8 chapter 22 mohammad did approve of rape for his followers so you are lying.as far as pedophilia what about the hadith where he asks one of his followers why he didn't marry a young girl so he could play with her and then he said they needed to wait till sundown so the women would have time to shave there pubic hair..you also point to the fact since he just did it once(married but we don't know for sure how many others outside of marriage he had sex with)doesn't make it right.

Sabir doesn't think that all of Islam believes in things not written in Qur'an and even then those things can be interpreted to say something not intended by the prophet Muhammad.

Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men...
 
so the life of mohammad should not be questioned?or are you supporting the idea of weak hadiths whenever something that brings the prophet mohammad into a bad light.also the hadith about mohammad talking to his follower who is in a hurry eager to see his wife who is questioned by mohammad since she is not a young girl and then telling him they must wait tell dark so the women can shave there pubic hair is one of the more reliable hadiths amongst muslims they just can't explain this strange behavior.have you ever studied closely the life of mohammad?how then do you explain the extreme violence,the persecution of christians and jews,the assainations,allowing his followers to rape and torture without the slightest rebuke and war starting with mohammad and the first caliph to modern day?how can you call this a holy man or someones life to be mimicked?would you ever rape a woman?would you ever torture someone?would you ever kill someone because they said something bad against your religion or the prophet?would you want to live in a society where christians and jews are second class citizens forced to pay a back breaking tax and a certain moral code was enforced with the death penalty?if not why follow the religion of a man who did.
 
Originally posted by cptpwichita

so the life of mohammad should not be questioned?or are you supporting the idea of weak hadiths whenever something that brings the prophet mohammad into a bad light.also the hadith about mohammad talking to his follower who is in a hurry eager to see his wife who is questioned by mohammad since she is not a young girl and then telling him they must wait tell dark so the women can shave there pubic hair is one of the more reliable hadiths amongst muslims they just can't explain this strange behavior.have you ever studied closely the life of mohammad?how then do you explain the extreme violence,the persecution of christians and jews,the assainations,allowing his followers to rape and torture without the slightest rebuke and war starting with mohammad and the first caliph to modern day?how can you call this a holy man or someones life to be mimicked?would you ever rape a woman?would you ever torture someone?would you ever kill someone because they said something bad against your religion or the prophet?would you want to live in a society where christians and jews are second class citizens forced to pay a back breaking tax and a certain moral code was enforced with the death penalty?if not why follow the religion of a man who did.

The world of Islam were converted to this religion by the threat of death by the followers of Muhammad.

They are the ones who believe in sacrificing their own children to their god by throwing them into fire.

Don't be fooled. There is no world in which the unbelievers are going to allow to live unless they convert to Allah and his evil ways.

These evil ones are not as new phenomena. They will be destroyed but not by mankind.
 
See, the Catholic priests aren't that bad. They would never think of throwing acid on their victims. Heavens-to-betsy. Why, that is deplorable. Just think what that poor boy is going through.

Now hand me my bible. I know I saw a chapter somewhere approving of molestation in the Old Testament. Or was the last copy of NAMBLA magazine I was reading?

Six of one, half a dozen of the other...:cof:
 
roman catholicism held the truth from the people for centuries not letting them have bibles and holding masses in latin.purgatory is just one dogma created to steal the peoples money and hold control over their subjects(sure the church can get your loved one out of the fires of purgatory but it will cost you for this special ceremony).and people still fall for this nonsense.when priests abuse kids why don't catholics hold the pope and cardinals responsible for letting churchs turn into nambla conventions?you would think people would read there bible and see christ is the one and only one to be worshipped and praised and in him alone will you be saved -not mary and not the pope.
 

Forum List

Back
Top