And Yet Another Attack On Americans!

[Fang]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bringing in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

And this....

"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate. At the two-hour event in Charleston, South Carolina, Clinton mentioned the president 10 times—more than the other two candidates combined."
How Each Democratic Candidate Is Trying To Leverage President Obama

Hillary is doing her best not to admit the economy is in trouble as it throws her former boss under the bus. But she has said enough about the middle class and economy that it's obvious Obama's policies have not worked. Why do we want 4 more years of failed Liberal policy?

 

[Dot Com]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Since it was Obama and his pals in the Democratic party who spent 2006-2008 talking the economy into the ditch with their doom and gloom everything is horrible propaganda just so they could win back the White House, and since Dem's controlled congress for those 2 years, he is largely responsible for the mess in the first place.

link? You are blaming the econ downturn on a whispering campaign by the Dems? You are a clown

 

[Dot Com]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bringing in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

And this....

"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate. At the two-hour event in Charleston, South Carolina, Clinton mentioned the president 10 times—more than the other two candidates combined."
How Each Democratic Candidate Is Trying To Leverage President Obama

Hillary is doing her best not to admit the economy is in trouble as it throws her former boss under the bus. But she has said enough about the middle class and economy that it's obvious Obama's policies have not worked. Why do we want 4 more years of failed Liberal policy?

his policies haven't been implemented because of an obstructionist House you idiot

 

[Fenton Lum]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

Who did that to them I wonder.

The bias of the news media, academia and government schools.

O'Sullivan's First Law (a.k.a. O'Sullivan's Law), paraphrased by George Will as stating that any institution that is not libertarian and classically liberal will, over time, become collectivist and statist.

O'Sullivan's First Law: All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become left-wing. I cite as supporting evidence the ACLU, the Ford Foundation, and the Episcopal Church. The reason is, of course, that people who staff such bodies tend to be the sort who don't like private profit, business, making money, the current organization of society, and, by extension, the Western world. At which point Michels's Iron Law of Oligarchy takes over — and the rest follows. http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-jos062603.asp


BTW....are you a government school grad?

Your media machine is in the hands of 6 major multinational corporations who preside over 90% of what americans see, hear and read.

You seem unable to state your position in a clear and unequivocal manner.


For edification:

Here is an exposure of leftist journalists using the term ‘racists’ to cow their political opponents. Enlightening.

1. After someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the race has been on to see who would sell the entire contents of the e-mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would get to buy them. We may never know who sold it, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller wound up with the data,…
2. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
3. …videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright….in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them.
4. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
5. …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
6. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
7. Journolist members collaborated on an open letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for asking questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…
8. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”
9. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.

Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists - Hot Air




Since David Weigel has been fired from the WaPo, many of the emails of the Journolist listserv group have come to light.

The following documents what many of us on the right have claimed about the machinations of the corrupt left wing press.

1....in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.

2 …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage....….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…

3. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”...

4. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

5. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House. Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat.

6. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

 

[Fenton Lum]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bringing in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

And this....

"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate. At the two-hour event in Charleston, South Carolina, Clinton mentioned the president 10 times—more than the other two candidates combined."
How Each Democratic Candidate Is Trying To Leverage President Obama

Hillary is doing her best not to admit the economy is in trouble as it throws her former boss under the bus. But she has said enough about the middle class and economy that it's obvious Obama's policies have not worked. Why do we want 4 more years of failed Liberal policy?

his policies haven't been implemented because of an obstructionist House you idiot

As it pertains to the rerigging of the american economy, this began back in th 1970-1980s and "neither" political party has or will do jack about it because they're "both" on board.

 

[PoliticalChic]

On his way out the door, Barack Hussein Obama is rushing to hammer one more nail in the coffin of the American economy.....that HE killed.



1. "Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose

2. ...Obama is racing against the clock to cement a massive Pacific Rim trade deal that all of his potential successors oppose,....

3. Ordinarily, a presidential administration would wait until Congress ratifies a trade agreement before putting it into force with member nations. But with just eight months left in office and presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders all against the deal, Obama and his advisors appear to have concluded that they must speed up that lengthy process to preserve the trade pact.




4. ....both Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress have said they are reluctant to bring the measure to a vote during the heat of a presidential campaign in which the three remaining presidential contenders are avowed opponents.

5. ....critics in Congress were particularly skeptical of what they saw as overly generous terms for Vietnam to comply with new labor and environmental standards of the deal,....





6. .....a report from the International Trade Commission released last week, which found that the deal would boost U.S. annual real income by only a modest $57.3 billion by 2032, gave ammunition to opponents in organized labor who said its potential impact on U.S. manufacturing was too severe.


7. "[The] report is so damaging that any reasonable observer would have to wonder why the administration or Congress would spend even one more day trying to turn this disastrous proposal into a reality," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said."
Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose





Just one more attempt by this tin-pot dictator, the titular head of the LGBT movement, to impose policies that will injure the American people.

Look around....and remember those who put this man in office.

Given the fact this republican majority house and senate are nothing but a bunch of total cowards lying to their constituents as to what they would do if elected, and given they will probably do obama's bidding on this one too ----

I truly have to believe a majority of republican have incriminating evidence in their past that is now being used against them as blackmail should they dare speak out against certain powers. Obama gets away with murder and no one in congress challenges him, nor do they see any of these scandals to incriminating ends. Blackmail, mostly of sexual nature, has to be at play here.

So true....and so disheartening.

Conservatives are political orphans in this once great nation.

Who did that to them I wonder.

The bias of the news media, academia and government schools.

O'Sullivan's First Law (a.k.a. O'Sullivan's Law), paraphrased by George Will as stating that any institution that is not libertarian and classically liberal will, over time, become collectivist and statist.

O'Sullivan's First Law: All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become left-wing. I cite as supporting evidence the ACLU, the Ford Foundation, and the Episcopal Church. The reason is, of course, that people who staff such bodies tend to be the sort who don't like private profit, business, making money, the current organization of society, and, by extension, the Western world. At which point Michels's Iron Law of Oligarchy takes over — and the rest follows. http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-jos062603.asp


BTW....are you a government school grad?

The ACLU is statist?

That must be why they are so often suing the government.

Now for yet another attempt to fill in your innumerable lacunae...(better look that up)

"The ACLU’s untold Stalinist heritage


Noted author Paul Kengor has unearthed declassified letters and other documents in the Soviet Comintern archives linking early leaders of the ACLU with the Communist Party.

Kengor found a May 23, 1931 letter in the archives signed by ACLU founder Roger Baldwin, written on ACLU stationery, to then American Communist Party Chairman William Z. Foster asking him to help ACLU Chairman Harry Ward with his then-upcoming trip to Stalin’s Russia.
The letter suggests Ward intended to visit the Soviet Union to find “evidence from Soviet Russia” that would undermine the capitalist profit motive.

Baldwin wrote the letter at a time when Stalin was deporting 1.8 million Ukrainian peasants to Siberia under his policy of the forced collectivization of agriculture, which resulted in the deaths of up to 10 million Ukrainians in the two years that followed.



Read more: The ACLU’s untold Stalinist heritage "

The ACLU’s untold Stalinist heritage



Seriously.....have you ever read any book beside the ones in which you color???

 

[PoliticalChic]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

The bias of the news media, academia and government schools.

O'Sullivan's First Law (a.k.a. O'Sullivan's Law), paraphrased by George Will as stating that any institution that is not libertarian and classically liberal will, over time, become collectivist and statist.

O'Sullivan's First Law: All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become left-wing. I cite as supporting evidence the ACLU, the Ford Foundation, and the Episcopal Church. The reason is, of course, that people who staff such bodies tend to be the sort who don't like private profit, business, making money, the current organization of society, and, by extension, the Western world. At which point Michels's Iron Law of Oligarchy takes over — and the rest follows. http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-jos062603.asp


BTW....are you a government school grad?

Your media machine is in the hands of 6 major multinational corporations who preside over 90% of what americans see, hear and read.

You seem unable to state your position in a clear and unequivocal manner.


For edification:

Here is an exposure of leftist journalists using the term ‘racists’ to cow their political opponents. Enlightening.

1. After someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the race has been on to see who would sell the entire contents of the e-mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would get to buy them. We may never know who sold it, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller wound up with the data,…
2. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
3. …videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright….in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them.
4. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
5. …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
6. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
7. Journolist members collaborated on an open letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for asking questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…
8. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”
9. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.

Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists - Hot Air




Since David Weigel has been fired from the WaPo, many of the emails of the Journolist listserv group have come to light.

The following documents what many of us on the right have claimed about the machinations of the corrupt left wing press.

1....in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.

2 …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage....….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…

3. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”...

4. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

5. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House. Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat.

6. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

 

[Fenton Lum]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

Your media machine is in the hands of 6 major multinational corporations who preside over 90% of what americans see, hear and read.

You seem unable to state your position in a clear and unequivocal manner.


For edification:

Here is an exposure of leftist journalists using the term ‘racists’ to cow their political opponents. Enlightening.

1. After someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the race has been on to see who would sell the entire contents of the e-mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would get to buy them. We may never know who sold it, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller wound up with the data,…
2. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
3. …videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright….in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them.
4. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
5. …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
6. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
7. Journolist members collaborated on an open letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for asking questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…
8. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”
9. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.

Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists - Hot Air




Since David Weigel has been fired from the WaPo, many of the emails of the Journolist listserv group have come to light.

The following documents what many of us on the right have claimed about the machinations of the corrupt left wing press.

1....in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.

2 …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage....….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…

3. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”...

4. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

5. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House. Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat.

6. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

 

[turzovka]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bringing in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

And this....

"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate. At the two-hour event in Charleston, South Carolina, Clinton mentioned the president 10 times—more than the other two candidates combined."
How Each Democratic Candidate Is Trying To Leverage President Obama

Hillary is doing her best not to admit the economy is in trouble as it throws her former boss under the bus. But she has said enough about the middle class and economy that it's obvious Obama's policies have not worked. Why do we want 4 more years of failed Liberal policy?

his policies haven't been implemented because of an obstructionist House you idiot

wow, you sure march to whatever tune the left is playing you.

Guess which one is you here?

 

[miketx]

On his way out the door, Barack Hussein Obama is rushing to hammer one more nail in the coffin of the American economy.....that HE killed.



1. "Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose

2. ...Obama is racing against the clock to cement a massive Pacific Rim trade deal that all of his potential successors oppose,....

3. Ordinarily, a presidential administration would wait until Congress ratifies a trade agreement before putting it into force with member nations. But with just eight months left in office and presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders all against the deal, Obama and his advisors appear to have concluded that they must speed up that lengthy process to preserve the trade pact.




4. ....both Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress have said they are reluctant to bring the measure to a vote during the heat of a presidential campaign in which the three remaining presidential contenders are avowed opponents.

5. ....critics in Congress were particularly skeptical of what they saw as overly generous terms for Vietnam to comply with new labor and environmental standards of the deal,....





6. .....a report from the International Trade Commission released last week, which found that the deal would boost U.S. annual real income by only a modest $57.3 billion by 2032, gave ammunition to opponents in organized labor who said its potential impact on U.S. manufacturing was too severe.


7. "[The] report is so damaging that any reasonable observer would have to wonder why the administration or Congress would spend even one more day trying to turn this disastrous proposal into a reality," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said."
Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose





Just one more attempt by this tin-pot dictator, the titular head of the LGBT movement, to impose policies that will injure the American people.

Look around....and remember those who put this man in office.

More proof that PoliticalChic is clueless.

One of her most tedious talking points is to say that the founders of this country did so on the fundamental principles of

individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

(You can find her saying that about 100 times if you check it out)

But here, today, in classic ODS fashion, she attacks President Obama for pushing a free trade agreement.

too funny

When, ever, will feckless libtards such as yourself realize that the politicians in Washington today, do not have America's best interests at heart, but instead, their own. If you support president obastard, you are either fool or a traitor.

 

[miketx]

wow, you sure march to whatever tune the left is playing you.

Guess which one is you here?

I know you point to the dancing monkey, but if you think about it, you can see that most if not all of the libtards on here are accomplished "organ grinders" in their own right!

 

[PoliticalChic]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

You seem unable to state your position in a clear and unequivocal manner.


For edification:

Here is an exposure of leftist journalists using the term ‘racists’ to cow their political opponents. Enlightening.

1. After someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the race has been on to see who would sell the entire contents of the e-mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would get to buy them. We may never know who sold it, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller wound up with the data,…
2. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
3. …videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright….in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them.
4. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
5. …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
6. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
7. Journolist members collaborated on an open letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for asking questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…
8. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”
9. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.

Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists - Hot Air




Since David Weigel has been fired from the WaPo, many of the emails of the Journolist listserv group have come to light.

The following documents what many of us on the right have claimed about the machinations of the corrupt left wing press.

1....in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.

2 …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage....….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…

3. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”...

4. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

5. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House. Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat.

6. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

"....you seem able only to paste in the views of others."

Are you actually trying to hide behind how material is provided????
Really???

Every post is 100% my opinion, you moron. Or.....do you imagine they were chosen at random????
Do you??


For edification.....if any is possible in your case:
Some pointers.

1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(Critical Appraisal and Analysis - Critically Analyzing Information Sources - LibGuides at Cornell University)

3. A valid objection to this selection of sources may be the type of audience being addressed. Is the ‘pasted selection’ aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Do you find the level ‘over your head’ or is this source too elementary? Ibid.

4. Are you objecting to the author's credentials--institutional affiliation (where he or she works), educational background, past writings, or experience? Or simply looking for a weapon to attack the post? This, of course, would be puerile.

5. Providing summaries or outlines of a source is valid as long as a link to the original is provided, and the author’s meaning is conveyed.

6. Nor is it necessary to insert one’s own language if the original article is simply abbreviated, with link provided.

7. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml


While a public message board is the exact venue for giving opinions no matter their provenance, their attachment to reality, or even whether they are on a cognitive wavelength of any human on the planet, one should invest more credence to those that are able to show relevance, documentation and/or links.



You've been dissed and dismissed.

See Ya'

 

[PoliticalChic]

ummm..... unemployment is down and investments are up AS OPPOSED TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK OVER FROM HIS REPUB PREDECESSOR

You're welcome.

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

You seem unable to state your position in a clear and unequivocal manner.


For edification:

Here is an exposure of leftist journalists using the term ‘racists’ to cow their political opponents. Enlightening.

1. After someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the race has been on to see who would sell the entire contents of the e-mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would get to buy them. We may never know who sold it, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller wound up with the data,…
2. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
3. …videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright….in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them.
4. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
5. …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
6. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
7. Journolist members collaborated on an open letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for asking questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…
8. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”
9. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.

Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists - Hot Air




Since David Weigel has been fired from the WaPo, many of the emails of the Journolist listserv group have come to light.

The following documents what many of us on the right have claimed about the machinations of the corrupt left wing press.

1....in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.

2 …at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage....….a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals…

3. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”...

4. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: “If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

5. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House. Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat.

6. It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

Oh....and one more:

"Like I said,..."

It's "As I said."



Government schooling let you down again.

 

[Fenton Lum]

On his way out the door, Barack Hussein Obama is rushing to hammer one more nail in the coffin of the American economy.....that HE killed.



1. "Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose

2. ...Obama is racing against the clock to cement a massive Pacific Rim trade deal that all of his potential successors oppose,....

3. Ordinarily, a presidential administration would wait until Congress ratifies a trade agreement before putting it into force with member nations. But with just eight months left in office and presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders all against the deal, Obama and his advisors appear to have concluded that they must speed up that lengthy process to preserve the trade pact.




4. ....both Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress have said they are reluctant to bring the measure to a vote during the heat of a presidential campaign in which the three remaining presidential contenders are avowed opponents.

5. ....critics in Congress were particularly skeptical of what they saw as overly generous terms for Vietnam to comply with new labor and environmental standards of the deal,....





6. .....a report from the International Trade Commission released last week, which found that the deal would boost U.S. annual real income by only a modest $57.3 billion by 2032, gave ammunition to opponents in organized labor who said its potential impact on U.S. manufacturing was too severe.


7. "[The] report is so damaging that any reasonable observer would have to wonder why the administration or Congress would spend even one more day trying to turn this disastrous proposal into a reality," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said."
Obama races to cement the big Pacific Rim trade deal that all his potential successors oppose





Just one more attempt by this tin-pot dictator, the titular head of the LGBT movement, to impose policies that will injure the American people.

Look around....and remember those who put this man in office.

More proof that PoliticalChic is clueless.

One of her most tedious talking points is to say that the founders of this country did so on the fundamental principles of

individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

(You can find her saying that about 100 times if you check it out)

But here, today, in classic ODS fashion, she attacks President Obama for pushing a free trade agreement.

too funny

When, ever, will feckless libtards such as yourself realize that the politicians in Washington today, do not have America's best interests at heart, but instead, their own. If you support president obastard, you are either fool or a traitor.

Perhaps when you begin to see the system as a whole and not just politician on the "other side" as your problem?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

Oh....and one more:

"Like I said,..."

It's "As I said."



Government schooling let you down again.

I'm schooled enough to see all you're here for is to sling partisanshit.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Uh yea, more people are out of work today than in 40 years. Half the country has stopped looking for work. They don't count against the unemployment # anymore. One way to bring the unemployment # down is to just keep them unemployed until they stop counting.

"Too many families are working harder and harder, but still not getting ahead." - Hillary Clinton

“I'm one who believes we do need to try to revitalize the manufacturing sector. I have a specific plan to do that -- including a manufacturing renaissance tax credit so that companies will invest in America, will create manufacturing jobs here, will bring back jobs from overseas.” - - Hillary Clinton

Even the Dems own candidate agrees. The economy is stagnant and more jobs need to be created. The middle is class has been hit hard and is still down. Are you not listening to Bernie and Hillary?

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

You're not stating or articulating anything either, you're cutting/pasting in partisan tripe. This isn't a discussion of any kind.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

"....you seem able only to paste in the views of others."

Are you actually trying to hide behind how material is provided????
Really???

Every post is 100% my opinion, you moron. Or.....do you imagine they were chosen at random????
Do you??


For edification.....if any is possible in your case:
Some pointers.

1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(Critical Appraisal and Analysis - Critically Analyzing Information Sources - LibGuides at Cornell University)

3. A valid objection to this selection of sources may be the type of audience being addressed. Is the ‘pasted selection’ aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Do you find the level ‘over your head’ or is this source too elementary? Ibid.

4. Are you objecting to the author's credentials--institutional affiliation (where he or she works), educational background, past writings, or experience? Or simply looking for a weapon to attack the post? This, of course, would be puerile.

5. Providing summaries or outlines of a source is valid as long as a link to the original is provided, and the author’s meaning is conveyed.

6. Nor is it necessary to insert one’s own language if the original article is simply abbreviated, with link provided.

7. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml


While a public message board is the exact venue for giving opinions no matter their provenance, their attachment to reality, or even whether they are on a cognitive wavelength of any human on the planet, one should invest more credence to those that are able to show relevance, documentation and/or links.



You've been dissed and dismissed.

See Ya'

Thanks for anothier cut-n-paste.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

Oh....and one more:

"Like I said,..."

It's "As I said."



Government schooling let you down again.

I'm schooled enough to see all you're here for is to sling partisanshit.

A defining characteristic: on my side of the aisle, facts and knowledge; on your side of the aisle, profanity and vulgarity. Seems I've scored another point against ignorance, indoctrination and mythology.

Excellent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hildebeast recently said she'd consider bring in former cigar-dipper-in-chief to get the economy rolling. That's in spite of the fact that Monica's boyfriend is on record saying Barry's fixed it, something neither he nor all his predecessors could have done.

Well, then....how about trying to find anything in my posts that isn't true and accurate.

Didn't they teach you how to do that in government school?


As of now, your post is proof of everything I've said.

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

"....you seem able only to paste in the views of others."

Are you actually trying to hide behind how material is provided????
Really???

Every post is 100% my opinion, you moron. Or.....do you imagine they were chosen at random????
Do you??


For edification.....if any is possible in your case:
Some pointers.

1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(Critical Appraisal and Analysis - Critically Analyzing Information Sources - LibGuides at Cornell University)

3. A valid objection to this selection of sources may be the type of audience being addressed. Is the ‘pasted selection’ aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Do you find the level ‘over your head’ or is this source too elementary? Ibid.

4. Are you objecting to the author's credentials--institutional affiliation (where he or she works), educational background, past writings, or experience? Or simply looking for a weapon to attack the post? This, of course, would be puerile.

5. Providing summaries or outlines of a source is valid as long as a link to the original is provided, and the author’s meaning is conveyed.

6. Nor is it necessary to insert one’s own language if the original article is simply abbreviated, with link provided.

7. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml


While a public message board is the exact venue for giving opinions no matter their provenance, their attachment to reality, or even whether they are on a cognitive wavelength of any human on the planet, one should invest more credence to those that are able to show relevance, documentation and/or links.



You've been dissed and dismissed.

See Ya'

Thanks for anothier cut-n-paste.

Just to rub in your lack of education, let's remind all that you have been beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War.

Better look that up.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

Oh....and one more:

"Like I said,..."

It's "As I said."



Government schooling let you down again.

I'm schooled enough to see all you're here for is to sling partisanshit.

A defining characteristic: on my side of the aisle, facts and knowledge; on your side of the aisle, profanity and vulgarity. Seems I've scored another point against ignorance, indoctrination and mythology.

Excellent.

Yes of course, have a nice day.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I don't respond to partisan tripe, certainly not going to respond with pasting in partisan tripe in opposition to your partisan tripe. Did you have something you wished to discuss?

"I don't respond to partisan tripe, blah blah blah...."


And yet another brain dead Liberal bites the dust.


So stipulated.....the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

Like I said, your media is owned by 6 major multinational corporations, you can thank "liberal" Bill Clinton for deregulating the FCC. Furthermore you seem to have no trouble locating myopically slanted partisan material with which to reinforce your own myopic views and avoid anything that would challenge what you have accepted as a religion.
So I take that as a "no" regarding a discussion since you seem able only to paste in the views of others.

"....you seem able only to paste in the views of others."

Are you actually trying to hide behind how material is provided????
Really???

Every post is 100% my opinion, you moron. Or.....do you imagine they were chosen at random????
Do you??


For edification.....if any is possible in your case:
Some pointers.

1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(Critical Appraisal and Analysis - Critically Analyzing Information Sources - LibGuides at Cornell University)

3. A valid objection to this selection of sources may be the type of audience being addressed. Is the ‘pasted selection’ aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Do you find the level ‘over your head’ or is this source too elementary? Ibid.

4. Are you objecting to the author's credentials--institutional affiliation (where he or she works), educational background, past writings, or experience? Or simply looking for a weapon to attack the post? This, of course, would be puerile.

5. Providing summaries or outlines of a source is valid as long as a link to the original is provided, and the author’s meaning is conveyed.

6. Nor is it necessary to insert one’s own language if the original article is simply abbreviated, with link provided.

7. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml


While a public message board is the exact venue for giving opinions no matter their provenance, their attachment to reality, or even whether they are on a cognitive wavelength of any human on the planet, one should invest more credence to those that are able to show relevance, documentation and/or links.



You've been dissed and dismissed.

See Ya'

Thanks for anothier cut-n-paste.

Just to rub in your lack of education, let's remind all that you have been beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War.

You just "know" don't ya.