Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what do you want us to do?
Put up more images like those you posted or have a discussion on how the red haired people moved to other areas like Peru and Egypt?
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
skin pigmentation does not vary depending on the climatic factor, if Vosse really true, then you should find an Arab with white skin, blue eyes and blond hair / red.
The Mongols of white skin are the result of mixed ethnic occurred with Slavic populations in the territories of the steppes.
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
Most Chinese are white. I would not be surprised to find a blond haired Mongolian; their ancestors took a lot of women captive in Europe during the time of the Mongol empire. But I don’t expect there are a lot of them for the same reason the blacks in Europe during the Roman empire disappeared shortly after the all of the empire. .
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
All human beings are genetically 99.9% indistinguishable.
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
All human beings are genetically 99.9% indistinguishable.
Yes, but a lot of that DNA is junk that we share with chips, plants and one cell organisms. You are distantly related to a tree in that you both share a common ancestor.
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
Most Chinese are white. I would not be surprised to find a blond haired Mongolian; their ancestors took a lot of women captive in Europe during the time of the Mongol empire. But I don’t expect there are a lot of them for the same reason the blacks in Europe during the Roman empire disappeared shortly after the all of the empire. .
The fact that we were the ethnic mixtures throughout history, does not mean that we all come from the same womb ancestral ..
You forgot the expansionism process ethnic/military of the Carthaginians in Italy
P.S.
The peoples of the Arab / Semitic in origin were not Negroid Africans, this mixture took place as a result of the colonization of the peoples Indo-Aryans / Iranian / Aryan, northern africa center
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
All human beings are genetically 99.9% indistinguishable.
Yes, but a lot of that DNA is junk that we share with chips, plants and one cell organisms. You are distantly related to a tree in that you both share a common ancestor.
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
All human beings are genetically 99.9% indistinguishable.
Yes, but a lot of that DNA is junk that we share with chips, plants and one cell organisms. You are distantly related to a tree in that you both share a common ancestor.
Nonetheless, we DO all come from the same "ancestral womb"
Of course it does variate, and there are Arabs with white skin and blue eyes.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/images/map_of_skin_color_distribution.gif
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01925/Bashar-al-Assad-su_1925765b.jpg.
will be part of a minority, the result always imbastardimenti with indigenous European
No, these ethnic groups are very ancient, they are older than Slavs or Mongols.
The analysis of fissile DNA confirms that.
As we see in the charts, there is no correlation between haplogroups and the pigmentation of skin, hair or eyes, but there is a correlation between skull shape and the haplogroups:
http://www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf
There are many studies regarding the DNA, and not all coincide with each other.
One should not take into account only volumes of compliance of the skull to track a particular ethnic framework, but we must also take into consideration the size, the size, the color of the skin, eyes and hair ..
Do you really think that the Slavs have not bastardized with peoples Mongols Asian ???
Are lands that have seen several kingdoms in the course of their history and various migratory flows with different ethnic groups, especially a question of geography territorial ...
It is a mixture of Nordic, Asian (Mongols) and Aryan (Middle East) ..
The peoples of old Europe gylany (pre-Indo-European) were mostly lower in stature, light-skinned and blond hair reddish.
there are blatant ethnic diversity among these three groups:
gylany pre-Indo-Europeans indigenous
Semitic Middle East (true Aryans)
pygmies Dravidian (indigenous peoples gylany africa and india pre Aryan):
the truth is that we are not all equal, and not all come from the same ancestral womb.
All human beings are genetically 99.9% indistinguishable.
Yes, but a lot of that DNA is junk that we share with chips, plants and one cell organisms. You are distantly related to a tree in that you both share a common ancestor.
Nonetheless, we DO all come from the same "ancestral womb"
Not really, just look at the physical traits of each of us to seize that we are not all equal.
Most often it does not match the genetic archeology, ethnology and anthropology.
The northern Germany and Scandinavia were themselves colonized later by Central European groups.
It was during this process that for the first time the physical traits of blond hair and blue eyes coincided with those of the Indo-European language.
The Indo-European (Aryan) ancestral so they were not blond. The blondness was a physical trait of pre-Indo-European peoples of northern Europe, whose indo was partial, since about population groups from which descend the Germans and Celts, but not the ancestors of the Finns, who never came to adopt an Indo-European Language.
Well, in regions with less sun you can only survive if you have less pigment in your skin, hairs and eyes, because your body can only produce vitamin D if it has less pigment.
Any race has variations in skin pigmentation, and individuals with less pigment in their skin have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
So in about 1000 years a group of dark skinned people can completely change their skin colour.
The fair skin or hair is not restricted to the Caucasian race, there are a lot of Mongoloid people in Russia who have blue eyes, fair hair and skin, but they have a completely different shape of the scull, they look like Mongolians, not like Caucasians.
The skin pigmentation changes more quickly, than scull shape, that is why there are white Caucasians and white Mongolians, but uneducated people talk about the "white race", ignoring the fact that there are white Mongoloid and white Caucasoid people who are two different races.
Most Chinese are white. I would not be surprised to find a blond haired Mongolian; their ancestors took a lot of women captive in Europe during the time of the Mongol empire. But I don’t expect there are a lot of them for the same reason the blacks in Europe during the Roman empire disappeared shortly after the all of the empire. .
The fact that we were the ethnic mixtures throughout history, does not mean that we all come from the same womb ancestral ..
You forgot the expansionism process ethnic/military of the Carthaginians in Italy
P.S.
The peoples of the Arab / Semitic in origin were not Negroid Africans, this mixture took place as a result of the colonization of the peoples Indo-Aryans / Iranian / Aryan, northern africa center
I do agree that the 'out of Africa' theory is probably wrong, and that humans could have 'originated' in more than one region of the planet. I don't see a lot of racial features that change merely because of environment and climate, frankly. Don't know that it matters much now, given all the migration and inter-breeding over 40,000 or so years. I don't know of many people who are going to fall down and worship you just because of your DNA, hair color, or anything else, in any case. After all, those degenerate inferior Slavs overran half of 'pure Aryan' Germany in '45, and the grand leader of the Aryan Super Race died a whining, sniveling coward, committing suicide in a bunker in Berlin. If the 'Aryans' thought their Hero was so grand, just how 'smart' and 'superior' could they really be as a 'race' after making such a stupid mistake?