beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 45,071
- 16,766
- 2,250
Just on your point being made - Yes, but when heterosexuals do that in which you may be speaking of also, well does that make them right just because they are heterosexuals that are trying all sorts of things maybe ? I think not in many peoples minds, but as long as it stays in their bedrooms as a private thing between them, then who cares really other than them ? Now if out in the public and speaking on such things that would suggest that others should try or do what they do, well they shouldn't be ashamed when it doesn't work out or make them right at all either in many peoples minds, and this because they are also straying to far from the natural order of things according to those who hear such a thing in public. But who cares as long as it stays strictly private, and that it is also something consensual between the two heterosexuals while in the privacy of their own bedrooms. This opinion can either be from a religious standpoint, and/or probably it could be also from a whole lot of secularist and their standpoints as well, and for whom think it strange to deviate to far from the natural order or standard of things. There are probably many still for whom don't play around in any kind of wild and crazy ways when having sex I'm thinking, other than to keep it morally decent in their minds when having sex with one another, either when starting a family or even after having kids.As a person of sound reason, I am indeed an authority on what is and is not perverse... Sadly, the only human beings who are not, are those who are saddled with a disordered mind, as such limits the scope of their reasoning to that which serves their own subjective, perverse needs.
But your not a person of sound reasoning....[sic]
Straw reasoning ...
That you consider gays to be 'perverse' and 'despised' and 'loathed' and 'abhorred'
Yet another argument fabricated from intellectual straw, as I've not made such an argument; thus your perspective is an axiomatic disqualification from consideration by reasonable people. So once again you yield from the standing points, therein conceding to the points from which you sought to deflect.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(The Reader should understand that my argument is that homosexual behavior, not only deviates from the human physiological standard, which establishes human physiological normality, homosexual behavior deviates as FAR FROM THAT STANDARD as is humanly possible. What's more the demand that such deviancy is in alignment with the standard is FALSE. And where a person advances that which they know to be false, they're known as a LIAR... .
Of course, the contributor would have you believe that they do not 'know' that Homosexuality deviates from the human physiological design... which sadly, > if < that is truly her understanding, she suffers from an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by reality and the evidence common to rational argument; presenting her as being symptomatic of mental disorder.)
Homosexuality doesn't deviate from any 'design'. That's why heterosexuals are apt to perform every sex act homosexuals do.