- Thread starter
- #121
You're looking for proof that the term Alt-Right existed before Hillary's speech?Particularly with the idea that it is inherently anti-Semitic and white supremacist. And the reason I say this is because like any political ideology it can be held by anyone. Therefore, a person in Israel for example could adopt alt-right tenets of nativism, nationalism, protectionism, and cultural pride and be an alt-righter just as a Haitian or a Polynesian could be. I think it would be foolish to attempt to tie a political ideology to being for or against one race unless that ideology explicitly states so. I mean consider that many say that Marxist ideologies are inherently anti-white. I don't know about you, but I personally and strongly believe that the above claim is nonsense.Hmmm...well I disagree, I think the sources given are a little dodgy. Personally I'd define alt-right as being similar to socialism in the way that it fits in to the left-right spectrum in the sense that socialism is liberal and democratic it has communist elements and alt-rightism is conservative and democratic (referring to form of government, not party) it contains fascist elements.While I disagree with him and find that the idea that ONLY right wingers detest Wikipedia (I don't think most college professors are right wingers), I still encourage you to check the actual sources for their validity.
Wikipedia is a good "base" of information. The definition of the alt-right sounds very accurate.
Then elaborate on what part of wiki's definition that you disagree with.
Feel free to show us your prescient threads and posts on Alt Right prior to the release of Hillarys Talking Points on 8/25
Are you THAT eager for another ass-kicking?