All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ Hollie, et al,

• The US Decided to release $60M of a $125M --- while withholding $65M from the UN Relief Works Agency (UNRWA)
  
• The UNRWA provides services to Palestinians across the Middle East

But the real questions ARE:

• Why is the US being held responsible for the "humanitarian impact."
• Why, out of the 22 Arab League member, only three members (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait) made a combined donation of $67.6M. (Source of the Chart is the UNRWA)​

​

Even with the cut, the US donated more than any single Arab League nation; and ever damn near matching the Arab League donation in the top 20 (∆ $2.6M).

Canadian doctor shot by Israelis lobbies Trudeau to fund Gaza hospital project

Ya’ Allah, dude. The Arab-Moslem welfare scammers are getting quite panicked at the reality of their welfare entitlement being scaled back.

‘A death sentence’: Palestinians slam U.S. decision to cut aid as U.N. pleads for new donors

(COMMENT)

They act like it is a duty to be the nation that contributes twice what the next highest contributor donates. And they talk as if the US should be looked down upon for what contributions it does make.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

 

[Hollie]

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

It's expected that the cut and paste is from one of your favorite islamist tabloids with headlines including such nonsense as "massacre".

 

[member]

Bernie Sanders’ Criticism Of Israel Is Radical. And He’s Taking It Mainstream

Last month, Sanders crossed one of the red lines demarcating politically acceptable Washington discourse about Israel. He organized the first letter written by multiple senators criticizing Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip. Then, last week, he raced past that line again with a video that is unlike anything I’ve ever seen from an American senator.
Read more: Opinion | Bernie Sanders’ Criticism Of Israel Is Radical. And He’s Taking It Mainstream

"This is excellent. I wholeheartedly agree we should be listening to the people of Gaza. -- Do you know what absolutely none of them said? What none of them want? A GREAT RETURN. Not one."




I thought for sure—you were going to say they said: we’re sick of terrorists being “our government” and want a better life!!



We need new leaders !




"What do the people of Gaza want?"



"Electricity. Jobs."




"The ability to travel and return."




"Peace".





"A future!"




“Electricity” ??? – they blew up their own electric grid – what future ?


Truthfully, a power grid in their hands [located in the west bank or gaza strip or at headquarters [the camp]:

...you might as well build a bomb in tel aviv …and deliver it yourselves to hamass….

 

[member]

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

It's expected that the cut and paste is from one of your favorite islamist tabloids with headlines including such nonsense as "massacre".

"favorite islamist tabloids..."


with all the reading material out there.... who's surprised anymore that he goes there...

 

[USAF 2023]

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

What “ Massacre” is he referring to?

 

[Hollie]

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

What “ Massacre” is he referring to?

He just likes to rattle on with melodramatic screeching.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

 

[rylah]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ rylah, et al,

​

Yes! → The cry of "colonialism" is just a theme. It is an emotional plea from the immature Arab Palestinian Activists and complainants to induce sympathy from those that really don't understand the meaning of "colonial." Those that understand the international law meaning behind that terminology know that the Arab Palestinians, and those that support pro-Arab Palestinians position, misunderstand colonialism as a synonym for imperialism.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

(COMMENT)

Israel was not then and is not now a political-economic and/or a political-military extension of a parent country's sovereignty over the territory (formerly under the Mandate); a territory established through the settlement of colonies or administrative dependencies on the parent. But because of the misleading ways, the Anti-Israeli Lobby presents the facts relative to the Applied Powers Mandate to facilitate Jewish Immigration for establishing of a Jewish National Home (not an imperial colony).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

Rather desperate, dumping the same YouTube video in multiple threads.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

Rather desperate, dumping the same YouTube video in multiple threads.

Zionist trolls take the same dump on multiple threads.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ rylah, et al,

View attachment 200605
​

Yes! → The cry of "colonialism" is just a theme. It is an emotional plea from the immature Arab Palestinian Activists and complainants to induce sympathy from those that really don't understand the meaning of "colonial." Those that understand the international law meaning behind that terminology know that the Arab Palestinians, and those that support pro-Arab Palestinians position, misunderstand colonialism as a synonym for imperialism.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

(COMMENT)

Israel was not then and is not now a political-economic and/or a political-military extension of a parent country's sovereignty over the territory (formerly under the Mandate); a territory established through the settlement of colonies or administrative dependencies on the parent. But because of the misleading ways, the Anti-Israeli Lobby presents the facts relative to the Applied Powers Mandate to facilitate Jewish Immigration for establishing of a Jewish National Home (not an imperial colony).

Most Respectfully,
R

Settler colonialism is a relatively new term. I don't believe it is mentioned in international law. However, the process of settler colonialism violates the universal rights of a people. The right to self determination without external interference, the right to independence and sovereignty, and the right to territorial integrity are all violated by settler colonialism. So, the term settler colonialism merely consolidates these violations into a single term.

And remember, both Britain and the Zionists openly used the term colonialism to define the Zionist project.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

​

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

Rather desperate, dumping the same YouTube video in multiple threads.

Zionist trolls take the same dump on multiple threads.

Nice duck.

 

[Hollie]

However, the process of settler colonialism violates the universal rights of a people. The right to self determination without external interference, the right to independence and sovereignty, and the right to territorial integrity are all violated by settler colonialism..​

That description clearly defines the history of islamic gee-had as a function of the politico-religious ideology.​

 

[P F Tinmore]

However, the process of settler colonialism violates the universal rights of a people. The right to self determination without external interference, the right to independence and sovereignty, and the right to territorial integrity are all violated by settler colonialism..​

That description clearly defines the history of islamic gee-had as a function of the politico-religious ideology.​

You post that on multiple threads.

 

[Shusha]

However, the process of settler colonialism violates the universal rights of a people. The right to self determination without external interference, the right to independence and sovereignty, and the right to territorial integrity are all violated by settler colonialism. So, the term settler colonialism merely consolidates these violations into a single term.

Nearly every country in the world has been touched by 'settler colonialism' (otherwise known as 'migration'). There are VERY few ethnically homogeneous nations in existence in the world untouched by waves of cultural migration. (Japan? Korea? Denmark? Fiji?)

Assuming that these historical and modern migrations actually ARE violations of the rights to self determination, independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity (and I'm inclined to agree with you that they are), what is to be done with a world -- 194 States, give or take the odd few -- which has developed as a product of these violations? At least up until ~100 years ago when it began to be rejected?

The problem with your arguments is that you don't seem to be able to construct an objective, comprehensive, reasonable and fairly applied structure to answering these questions. (Not the least of which is how to determine which peoples rights are being violated). Instead, you reverse engineer "how can I delegitimize the Jewish people's rights", which results in a standard you apply to no State, no matter how "settler colonized", except Israel.

If we apply your basic concept of a "violation of universal rights" to France or Spain or Canada or Australia or Brazil or Mexico or the US or Morocco or Britain -- what would you suggest would be the corrective measures to take?

 

[rylah]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The lack of a need to comment, or extend a defense, on a specific event → is distinct and different → from a lack of evidence (demonstrrating the actual facts) or ignorance (in what the data points actually support as a causal factor).

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

There’s been a lot of online commentary about how so few members of Congress have criticized Israel’s
premeditated massacre of civilian demonstrators in the besieged Gaza Strip last Friday.

Just three have done so on Twitter and one did so through an aide.

But here’s another remarkable fact that has not been noted: as far as The Electronic Intifada can determine, not one Democrat in the House or Senate has spoken up – at least on Twitter – to defend Israel’s actions.

This may reflect a recognition among Democratic leaders of how toxic Israel is becoming to a large segment of the party’s base.

Not one Democrat has defended Israel over Gaza massacre

(COMMENT)

Now, there is the real Democratic Party Position, and there are crackpot notions that the anti-Israeli people like to punch; innuendos if you will.

See the Official Democratic Platform Page
Middle East
In the Middle East, Democrats will push for more inclusive governance in Iraq and Syria that respects the equal rights of all citizens; provide support and security for Lebanon and Jordan, two countries that are hosting a disproportionate number of refugees; maintain our robust security cooperation with Gulf countries; and stand by the people of the region as they seek greater economic opportunity and freedom. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism. That is why we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself, including by retaining its qualitative military edge, and oppose any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement.

We will continue to work toward a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict negotiated directly by the parties that guarantees Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity. While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement. Palestinians should be free to govern themselves in their own viable state, in peace and dignity.

The Democratic Party, not unlike the Republican Party, has a huge platform. the Arab-Israeli Conflict is just a thumbnail clipping in the actual play in international politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is true that Democrats, as a party, still support Israel. However, individual Democrats are moving away from that position. Bernie supporters are moving him away from his staunch support of Israel. About 30 members of congress skipped Nutandyahoo's speech. About 19 members have signed on to the No Way to Treat a Child initiative.

A short decade ago none of this could have happened.

How is this bad for Israel?
Some decades ago it wasn't even a central topic of the world inner politics.

Just remember that for any seemingly opposition there's a step forward in opportunities and business models, the more #BDS-holes go on the streets the more advanced will be the investments in the Israeli market.

But that's only marginal outcome, this trend makes Israel into a leading middle eastern country in a fashion You westerners don't realize, the more You go against Israel in Europe and US, the more the cry about "foreign colonialism" becomes irrelevant and self defeating.

In the meantime...this is even on Turkish tv: