Israel doesn't have rights.Not my fault you have a problem with Reading Comprehension.
1) Deliberately blocking Israel’s Right to International Waters
2) The U.N. deliberately leaving the area
Actions speak louder then words? You have them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Israel doesn't have rights.Not my fault you have a problem with Reading Comprehension.
1) Deliberately blocking Israel’s Right to International Waters
2) The U.N. deliberately leaving the area
Actions speak louder then words? You have them
What do you think the Mandate was all about? Moving the Rams back to Los Angeles?Somebody stated you posted a link that indicated Israel wanted to take over Arab Territory . I thought that was actually hilarious
I thought you were leaving?Another lie
Then the idea of an Arab state in Palestine is irrelevant.None of them."Arab" is irrelevant.You don't understand the argument.RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Exactly what is: "Israel's settler colonial project"
(BLUF): There is actually no such thing. Those are just words of description that can be generated manually or auto computer generated from any number of nerd site.
Descriptive Word List of Adjective Word Reference said:Our descriptive words index contains a huge selection of words which you can use for your writing projects. It is also great for students and teachers, this resource will be beneficial to your school English studies. We have categorized descriptive words by category. We also have a search function which you can use to finds the right descriptive words and phrases quickly!
And for heaven's sake, don't bring up those old newspaper cuttings and essays by the original members of the World Zionist Organization. Those are well over a century ago and have no connection at all to the post-1967 Six Day War outcomes.
(COMMENT)All Israeli settlers are necessary, integral, and active members of Israel's settler-colonial project.
Now I don't believe that settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, virtually every action required to achieve such a project is illegal.
Can you name anything about Israel that is actually legal?
I await your response.
Everything about the completion of the "Step Preparatory to Independent" and the subsequent creation of the Jewish State of Israel was entirely legal. It was done with the explicit approval of the UN and tacit approval of the Security Council. The Arab League, violating Article 2(4) ignited the conflict that still rages today in a slightly different form.
As you well know, the West Bank into three administrative divisions. We generally say or describe these areas as:
• Area A (full civil and security control by the Palestinian Authority)
• Area B (Palestinian civil control and joint Israeli-Palestinian security control)
• Area C (full Israeli civil and security control)
The settlements are all in Area C (full Israeli civil and security control). By agreement with the Arab Palestinian Leadership (AKA: The Palestinian Authority) and under the guidance Area "C" full Israeli civil and security control, any settlements established by Israel is "legal."
IF: the Arab Palestinian Leadership (AKA: The Palestinian Authority) had a:
• The political problem with the settlements,
• Wish to dispute the authority of the settlements,
• Want to challenge the competency of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated,
THEN: The complainant must use either of the recognized platforms.
• Oslo II Accord - Declaration of Principles On Interim Self-Government Arrangements (September 13, 1993)
※ Artilce V(3) (TRANSITIONAL PERIOD AND PERMANENT STATUS NEGOTIATIONS)
It is understood that these negotiations shall cover remaining issues, including: Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security arrangements, borders, relations and cooperation with other neighbors, and other issues of common interest.
※ Article XV (RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES)
Disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of this Declaration of Principles. or any subsequent agreements pertaining to the interim period, shall be resolved by negotiations through the Joint Liaison Committee to be established pursuant to Article X above.
• These methods are 100% consistent with the existing and internationally accept practice:
※ Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.
※ All States shall pursue in good faith negotiations for the early conclusion of a universal treaty on general and complete disarmament under effective international control and strive to adopt appropriate measures to reduce international tensions and strengthen confidence among States.
Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States said:States shall accordingly seek early and just settlement of their international disputes by negotiation, inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements or other peaceful means of their choice. In seeking such a settlement the parties shall agree upon such peaceful means as may be appropriate to the circumstances and nature of the dispute.
(ARAB PALESTINIAN OBSTRUCTION TO PEACE)
The fact that the Arab Palestinian Leadership has not fulfilled in good faith of the obligations assumed by States, in accordance with the Charter. Neither policy nor violence should be a driver towards peace. The default political position is "peace." Peace should be the natural static condition for any modern state to gravitate towards. In the case of the Arab Palestinians, → the default political stance is something other than peace.
Most Respectfully,
ROnly Zionist shills will argue with source documents.And for heaven's sake, don't bring up those old newspaper cuttings and essays by the original members of the World Zionist Organization.
In which document does it mention that Palestine is an Arab state?
I thought you were leaving?Another lie
No. You fucking comment on what I said!Egypt initiated War by deliberately blocking Israel’s Right to International Waters. Tell us please why this was done and why the U.N. peacekeepers deliberately left
(COMMENT)Rights are non negotiable.It is understood that these negotiations shall cover remaining issues, including: Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security arrangements, borders, relations and cooperation with other neighbors, and other issues of common interest.
(COMMENT)Then what should the Palestinians do about the constant violence by Israel?Neither policy nor violence should be a driver towards peace. The default political position is "peace." Peace should be the natural static condition for any modern state to gravitate towards.
Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1938) said:
(COMMENT)Only if Resolution 181 was valid. It was not.Everything about the completion of the "Step Preparatory to Independent" and the subsequent creation of the Jewish State of Israel was entirely legal.
PLO Negotiation Affairs Department (NAD) said:Historic Palestine is a small country in size. Since the mid-twentieth century, it has been gradually wiped off the map. This began on 29 November 1947, when the United Nations General Assembly adopted an unprecedented and neverrepeated resolution (Resolution 181 (II)) to partition Palestine into two states; Palestine and Israel. To date, Palestinians continue to be denied their basic right to self-determination and the establishment of their own State. In fact, the 22% of historic Palestine the world agrees must be the territory of the State of Palestine is shrinking by the day.
(COMMENT)What about Israel's violations against Palestine's international boundaries?Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.
Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States said:Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.
(COMMENT)Only Zionist shills will argue with source documents.And for heaven's sake, don't bring up those old newspaper cuttings and essays by the original members of the World Zionist Organization.
What about Israel's violations against Palestine's international boundaries?
(COMMENT)Article 51 of the UN Charter is more specific by stating there is only 2 legal ways a country can attack another country and Israel didn't satisfy either one.
That's another bullshit lie. Every time they comply with Israeli demands, you fuckers move the goal posts.
(COMMENT)That's another bullshit lie. Every time they comply with Israeli demands, you fuckers move the goal posts.The Palestinians could have had their “state” a long time ago
What about Israel's violations against Palestine's international boundaries?
Seriously? You can't even maintain the integrity of your own arguments. According to your own arguments, Israel exists within "Palestine's" boundaries. By definition (yours), Israel can not violate Palestine's international boundaries.
The conflict is one of two competing peoples to self-determination within the same territory. The solution, evidenced everywhere in the world, is to divide the territory into two separate territories of self-determination. Why are the Arab Palestinians the only people on the planet to whom those standards do not apply?
Indeed, the natives and foreign colonial settlers inside Palestine.The conflict is one of two competing peoples to self-determination within the same territory.
Nonsense, Israel was a settler colonial project then and is a settler colonial project now. Nothing has changed.RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
You are confusing political platforms and positions with official state doctrine.
(COMMENT)Only Zionist shills will argue with source documents.And for heaven's sake, don't bring up those old newspaper cuttings and essays by the original members of the World Zionist Organization.
Source documents and political stances of the various political parties change over time. There is nothing static in politics, which may actually take a view differently.
Most Respectfully,
R
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ Billo_Really, et al,
You might give a thought to the question: When did the Hostile Arab Palestinians not target innocent civilians? They still target civilians using cars against pedestrians, or surprise knifings of shoppers.
(COMMENT)That's another bullshit lie. Every time they comply with Israeli demands, you fuckers move the goal posts.The Palestinians could have had their “state” a long time ago
The Hague Regulations and the Geneva Convention were around for a long time before the conflict. You cannot claim today that the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL) have been moving the goal posts.
It is just that the Arab Palestinians think they are a special case and exempt from the Customary and IHL because they call themselves freedom fighters; rather than the sociopaths that they are.
Anyone that argues they have the right to intentionally target unarmed civilians as a policy is simply missing a wrung in the evolutional chain of humanity.
Most Respectfully,
R
There goes your false premise again. It was Israel that initiated the hostilities.When did the Hostile Arab Palestinians not target innocent civilians?
The Palestinians are constantly pushing for law enforcement measures.RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ Billo_Really, et al,
NO! You are absolutely - 100% wrong.
(COMMENT)Article 51 of the UN Charter is more specific by stating there is only 2 legal ways a country can attack another country and Israel didn't satisfy either one.
Article 51 outlines an exception (self-defense). It does not establish the legal criteria for war.
On the other hand, Article to recognizes two other types of conflicts: 1) taking "preventive" action - or - 2) pursuing "enforcement" action.
The use of force is not limited to that mentioned. There are the 19 universal legal instruments and additional amendments dealing with terrorism. Each has resulted in enforcement measures.
Most Respectfully,
R
What about Israel's violations against Palestine's international boundaries?
Seriously? You can't even maintain the integrity of your own arguments. According to your own arguments, Israel exists within "Palestine's" boundaries. By definition (yours), Israel can not violate Palestine's international boundaries.
The conflict is one of two competing peoples to self-determination within the same territory. The solution, evidenced everywhere in the world, is to divide the territory into two separate territories of self-determination. Why are the Arab Palestinians the only people on the planet to whom those standards do not apply?
It does. That is the conflict in a nutshell. It is not complicated.According to your own arguments, Israel exists within "Palestine's" boundaries.