Alaska Wants To Secede - To Russia!

Yes, Bush started it, but Obama has taken it to new levels and the leftist assholes who complained about it when Bush started it are making excuses for it now. I was against it when Bush did it and am against it now. If it's wrong for one person to do it, it's wrong for another. Partisanship should end when our rights are being abused but not with liberals, they don't care about right and wrong, they will support their messiah no matter WHAT he does.

Isn't it a bit ignorant to support it when Bush started it, but not because Obama still does it now?

If it starts under a white man and is maintained by a white man, then it's okay.

If it starts under a white man and is then handed over to a black man, then the black man is responsible for all the evil that the program generated.

Face it...............Tea Baggers and Republicans are just pissed there is a black man in the White House.
Oh gee, the race card again. How clever.
 
Obama's not the brightest, tack, but he is a step above an aging dingbat. I'll give him that.

An ugly, impotent old man is in no position to assess anyone else's aging. I made a comment about your age and masculinity ages ago, like months and months, and yet you obssessively follow me around and make the same insult to my posts. I must have nailed it first time: you can't get it up, and are so upset by my meaningless, tossed off comment, you have for months and months followed me around and made the same insult, repetitively (you don't even have enough imagination to frame a new insult), about my age. Get over it. By doing what you are doing, you only prove I was right; otherwise, you would not be so upset about it. :badgrin:
I restrict my comments about you to that which I know. You are aging by your own admission and a dingbat apparent from your mindless, hackneyed and hysterical posts. I am certainly not the only one with a grasp of the obvious as I've seen plenty of similar comments.

You, on the other hand, post conjecture unworthy of a teeny bopper, despite your age. It's one of those sad-but-still-funny things that life occasionally throws up. :D

Literally, neither you, nor SJ and the like are worthy of engaging in real discussion. I am just responding to you in order to point out the obvious: you make it clear to the the whole boad that my comment about your manhood struck to the very depth; you make that clear by continually following me around and making the same insult time and again. When you act like that it means I was probably right. You are making a fool of yourself, but are nothing more than a small irritant to me. As well, neither you nor SJ and the like are in any position to assess someone else's intelligence: you are not smart enough to recognize true intelligence in others.
 
Isn't it a bit ignorant to support it when Bush started it, but not because Obama still does it now?

If it starts under a white man and is maintained by a white man, then it's okay.

If it starts under a white man and is then handed over to a black man, then the black man is responsible for all the evil that the program generated.

Face it...............Tea Baggers and Republicans are just pissed there is a black man in the White House.
Oh gee, the race card again. How clever.

Well................it kinda happens to be true. Every time that Obama has listened to the GOP and said they had good ideas, they voted against it.

Sorry...............but universal healthcare was an idea brought up by a Republican in MA (i.e. Romney), and it worked, but when it was brought up by Obama (a black Democrat) it was said to be unworkable and would kill jobs (as well as being repealed symbolically over 51 times by a GOP House).

Sorry.................but as a military retiree who now has health care because of the ACA, I'm glad it's the law of the land.
 
An ugly, impotent old man is in no position to assess anyone else's aging. I made a comment about your age and masculinity ages ago, like months and months, and yet you obssessively follow me around and make the same insult to my posts. I must have nailed it first time: you can't get it up, and are so upset by my meaningless, tossed off comment, you have for months and months followed me around and made the same insult, repetitively (you don't even have enough imagination to frame a new insult), about my age. Get over it. By doing what you are doing, you only prove I was right; otherwise, you would not be so upset about it. :badgrin:
I restrict my comments about you to that which I know. You are aging by your own admission and a dingbat apparent from your mindless, hackneyed and hysterical posts. I am certainly not the only one with a grasp of the obvious as I've seen plenty of similar comments.

You, on the other hand, post conjecture unworthy of a teeny bopper, despite your age. It's one of those sad-but-still-funny things that life occasionally throws up. :D

Literally, neither you, nor SJ and the like are worthy of engaging in real discussion. I am just responding to you in order to point out the obvious: you make it clear to the the whole boad that my comment about your manhood struck to the very depth; you make that clear by continually following me around and making the same insult time and again. When you act like that it means I was probably right. You are making a fool of yourself, but are nothing more than a small irritant to me. As well, neither you nor SJ and the like are in any position to assess someone else's intelligence: you are not smart enough to recognize true intelligence in others.
Are you kidding? You are notorious for your stupidity. No offense. :lol:
 
30,000 signatures in less than a week. What does that say about America's confidence in our president?

Thousands sign WhiteHouse.gov petition for Alaska to secede -- to Russia | Fox News

It says nothing about President Obama but does explain how Sarah Palin was elected governor.

Like I said further up the thread, Putin can have Alaska if he promises to keep the Palin clan.

Matter of fact, I'd like to see how far Putin would allow Sarah to exercise her free speech under Russian law.

I'm guessing she'd be shipped to Siberia in a week.
 
An ugly, impotent old man is in no position to assess anyone else's aging. I made a comment about your age and masculinity ages ago, like months and months, and yet you obssessively follow me around and make the same insult to my posts. I must have nailed it first time: you can't get it up, and are so upset by my meaningless, tossed off comment, you have for months and months followed me around and made the same insult, repetitively (you don't even have enough imagination to frame a new insult), about my age. Get over it. By doing what you are doing, you only prove I was right; otherwise, you would not be so upset about it. :badgrin:
I restrict my comments about you to that which I know. You are aging by your own admission and a dingbat apparent from your mindless, hackneyed and hysterical posts. I am certainly not the only one with a grasp of the obvious as I've seen plenty of similar comments.

You, on the other hand, post conjecture unworthy of a teeny bopper, despite your age. It's one of those sad-but-still-funny things that life occasionally throws up. :D

Literally, neither you, nor SJ and the like are worthy of engaging in real discussion. I am just responding to you in order to point out the obvious: you make it clear to the the whole boad that my comment about your manhood struck to the very depth; you make that clear by continually following me around and making the same insult time and again. When you act like that it means I was probably right. You are making a fool of yourself, but are nothing more than a small irritant to me. As well, neither you nor SJ and the like are in any position to assess someone else's intelligence: you are not smart enough to recognize true intelligence in others.
Just me and SJ?! FFS, your intellect, or the lack of it has been expressed by legions of posters. I guess it's the term "dingbat" which gets to you, doubtless because of the association with ditzy aging females.:badgrin:
 
Yes, Bush started it, but Obama has taken it to new levels and the leftist assholes who complained about it when Bush started it are making excuses for it now. I was against it when Bush did it and am against it now. If it's wrong for one person to do it, it's wrong for another. Partisanship should end when our rights are being abused but not with liberals, they don't care about right and wrong, they will support their messiah no matter WHAT he does.

Isn't it a bit ignorant to support it when Bush started it, but not because Obama still does it now?
Did you not read my answer to you? I never supported it. Not then, and not now.

I guess I read over it.
 
30,000 signatures in less than a week. What does that say about America's confidence in our president?

Thousands sign WhiteHouse.gov petition for Alaska to secede -- to Russia | Fox News

It says nothing about President Obama but does explain how Sarah Palin was elected governor.

Like I said further up the thread, Putin can have Alaska if he promises to keep the Palin clan.

Matter of fact, I'd like to see how far Putin would allow Sarah to exercise her free speech under Russian law.

I'm guessing she'd be shipped to Siberia in a week.

I wouldn't bother too much.
 
And to respond to someone who stated that the Republicans are just against universal healthcare because a black man wants it isn't right. Mitt Romney who wanted univeral healthcare wasn't really the most popular presidential candidate for the hardcore Republicans as well.
 
I restrict my comments about you to that which I know. You are aging by your own admission and a dingbat apparent from your mindless, hackneyed and hysterical posts. I am certainly not the only one with a grasp of the obvious as I've seen plenty of similar comments.

You, on the other hand, post conjecture unworthy of a teeny bopper, despite your age. It's one of those sad-but-still-funny things that life occasionally throws up. :D

Literally, neither you, nor SJ and the like are worthy of engaging in real discussion. I am just responding to you in order to point out the obvious: you make it clear to the the whole boad that my comment about your manhood struck to the very depth; you make that clear by continually following me around and making the same insult time and again. When you act like that it means I was probably right. You are making a fool of yourself, but are nothing more than a small irritant to me. As well, neither you nor SJ and the like are in any position to assess someone else's intelligence: you are not smart enough to recognize true intelligence in others.
Just me and SJ?! FFS, your intellect, or the lack of it has been expressed by legions of posters. I guess it's the term "dingbat" which gets to you, doubtless because of the association with ditzy aging females.:badgrin:

LMAO No it hasn't. That is extreme hyperbole and a completely ridiculous statement. In fact, the reality is completely the opposite. Completely. I get almost complete respect from most posters here, including the reasonable conservatives. So, you are just some foolish old man. A pathetic, foolish old man. Back on ignore. What annoys me is you are a stalker. It is annoying. If I am so useless as you proclaim, why do you stalk me?
 
Last edited:
Literally, neither you, nor SJ and the like are worthy of engaging in real discussion. I am just responding to you in order to point out the obvious: you make it clear to the the whole boad that my comment about your manhood struck to the very depth; you make that clear by continually following me around and making the same insult time and again. When you act like that it means I was probably right. You are making a fool of yourself, but are nothing more than a small irritant to me. As well, neither you nor SJ and the like are in any position to assess someone else's intelligence: you are not smart enough to recognize true intelligence in others.
Just me and SJ?! FFS, your intellect, or the lack of it has been expressed by legions of posters. I guess it's the term "dingbat" which gets to you, doubtless because of the association with ditzy aging females.:badgrin:

LMAO No it hasn't. That is extreme hyperbole and a completely ridiculous statement. In fact, the reality is completely the opposite. Completely. I get almost complete respect from most posters here, including the reasonable conservatives. So, you are just some foolish old man. A pathetic, foolish old man. Back on ignore. What annoys me is you are a stalker. It is annoying. If I am so useless as you proclaim, why do you stalk me?
It must be difficult and frustrating being a frowzy matron, but since you are a liberal, you were doubtless not much to look at even in your heyday. Still, you are obviously trying too hard. Being petty and shrill will not help you age a bit more gracefully nor shake the dingbat reputation you've accrued.
 
Yes, Bush started it, but Obama has taken it to new levels and the leftist assholes who complained about it when Bush started it are making excuses for it now. I was against it when Bush did it and am against it now. If it's wrong for one person to do it, it's wrong for another. Partisanship should end when our rights are being abused but not with liberals, they don't care about right and wrong, they will support their messiah no matter WHAT he does.

Isn't it a bit ignorant to support it when Bush started it, but not because Obama still does it now?

If it starts under a white man and is maintained by a white man, then it's okay.

If it starts under a white man and is then handed over to a black man, then the black man is responsible for all the evil that the program generated.

Face it...............Tea Baggers and Republicans are just pissed there is a black man in the White House.

Don't forget, according to Obama's poll numbers, more and more people are becoming racist. Support for Obama from the young has fallen. Obama has completely lost the independents which helped get him elected and Latino support has fallen as well. Imagine, all these people turning racist! What about republicans who voted for Obama (Obamacans)? It was great when they forgot that they were racists and voted for Obama in the first election. It's a shame that they turned into racists again by not voting for Obama the second time. Seriously, your only defense for Obama is to play the race card and use terms like "tea bagger". Are you really such a liberal mindless angry cliche or are you just doing a parody of one? It's hard to tell.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it a bit ignorant to support it when Bush started it, but not because Obama still does it now?

If it starts under a white man and is maintained by a white man, then it's okay.

If it starts under a white man and is then handed over to a black man, then the black man is responsible for all the evil that the program generated.

Face it...............Tea Baggers and Republicans are just pissed there is a black man in the White House.

Don't forget, according to Obama's poll numbers, more and more people are becoming racist. Support for Obama from the young has fallen. Obama has completely lost the independents which helped get him elected and Latino support has fallen as well. Imagine, all these people turning racist! What about republicans who voted for Obama (Obamacans)? It was great when they forgot that they were racists and voted for Obama in the first election. It's a shame that they turned into racists again by not voting for Obama the second time. Seriously, your only defense for Obama is to play the race card and use terms like "tea bagger". Are you really such a liberal mindless angry cliche or are you just doing a parody of one? It's hard to tell.

He really is and his posts show the desperation of the dems and libs as they try to defend the massive failure known as the obama years.

When Rand Paul gets a standing ovation at the most liberal campus on earth (Cal Berkley) then you know that the libs have lost.

their dream of a socialist utopia where everyone loves each other and we all dance around the may pole smoking pot is over. Obama killed it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top