taichiliberal
Rookie
- Aug 11, 2010
- 3,517
- 239
- 0
- Banned
- #981
"That's $115 billion in REDUCED REVENUE...."
Yes, so if you're a moron who thinks allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire will balance the budget, you're off by over $1 trillion.
I never said it would balance it alone, you Toddling buffoon! But it sure as hell would put a dent in our deficit, along with getting rid of the tax breaks/loopholes for mega corporations like Mobil....unless YOU, Toddy, have your head so far up Boehner's butt that you think $115 billion is irrelevent.
Get up to speed, Toddy boy.
LOL So business based here should not be allowed to compete globally. Force them overseas. It good for the dem job machine.
Brilliant. Just because they have been our boogieman for over 50 years.
Get a new act. Try to understand some basic economics. Jeez
WTF are you babbling about? NO ONE ON THIS THREAD HAS STATED THAT USA BUSINESS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE GLOBALLY.
But if YOU are suggesting that global competition requires employing NO American citizens domestically while EXPECTING Americans to buy the products at American prices, then I dare say the American corporation is NOT working for America but just a select few investors and management/R&D to "compete globally".
And exactly how is wanting American companies to employ Americans to produce products to be sold at home and abroad WHILE PAYING THE WORKERS A DECENT WAGE AND OFFERING DECENT BENEFITS "forcing" companies overseas?
You see chuckles, it's not the last 50 years of a boogeyman, but the last 30 years of the wishful thinking of a B-Grade actor and his corporate co-horts......a policy called "reaganomics" THAT HAS FAILED MISERABLY! A matter of fact, a matter of history, a matter of basic economics.
You need to load up mentally with something more than blanks, my Full-Auto friend.
Last edited: