Obama tries to stop Texas execution

Discussion in 'Politics' started by percysunshine, Jul 2, 2011.

  1. percysunshine
    Online

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    16,742
    Thanks Received:
    2,263
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +5,892
    "WASHINGTON — The Obama administration took the unusual step Friday of asking the Supreme Court to stop Texas from executing a Mexican citizen convicted of raping and killing a 16-year-old girl.

    The administration said the court should delay the planned July 7 execution of Humberto Leal for up to six months to give Congress time to consider legislation that would directly affect Leal's case.

    The 38-year-old native of Monterrey wasn't told he could contact the Mexican Consulate after his arrest in the murder of Adria Sauceda. His lawyers say police violated an international treaty by not telling Leal he could have consular assistance.

    Legislation pending in the Senate would allow federal courts to review cases of condemned foreign nationals to determine if the lack of consular help made a significant difference in the outcome of their cases. Last week, a federal judge refused to delay the execution.

    The Supreme Court has previously ruled that states can't be forced to comply with the provisions of treaties without some intervening federal legislation."


    Read more: Obama administration calls for halt to Texas execution | Houston & Texas News | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle


    I am not sure the Feds can stop it. A Federal court cannot stay a State court. Looks like another trip and fall for the Obama administration and a chance for Perry to give Obama the finger.
     
  2. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,268
    Thanks Received:
    14,919
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,072
    If Illegal Aliens aren't free to rape and murder our 16 year old daughters, are any of us truly free?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  3. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    WHAT?!?!

    If they did that, the SCOTUS has lost its collective mind.

    Treaties are the law of the LAND.

    The states do not get to parce out what parts of a treaty they like.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,457
    Thanks Received:
    19,869
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,484
    It would be a shame if Texas doesn't get it's quota of executions
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. percysunshine
    Online

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    16,742
    Thanks Received:
    2,263
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +5,892

    But it makes sense that Federal legislation must first be passed. Otherwise State law would mean nothing. There would be no States Rights, and we would all live in a giant Washington D.C., with Congress writing our traffic laws.
     
  6. Jack Fate
    Offline

    Jack Fate I'm Your Daddy

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    3,037
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northern Washington state
    Ratings:
    +338
    Even the UN wants Perry to stop the execution. That should be good enough reason to carry it out.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22Mrez7ahZA]YouTube - ‪Screw you, We're from Texas‬‏[/ame]
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,576
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,993
    The Federal Government must prove that failure to tell him about the Consular help materially effected the outcome of the trial. I do not see that happening. The State already gave him an appeal process and that was brought up in appeal and he lost.

    The Supreme Court can in fact overturn State Courts when they violate Federal Law. There is a process for that. The Obama administration will have to convince the Court that A) Federal laws were violated. And B) the Supreme Court is the proper remedy.

    Since there currently is no actual Federal law on the subject the Administration will have to plead that the Treaty rights granted by said Treaty raise to the level of breaking Federal Law.

    I will go on record as saying that this case should go to the Supreme Court but that I have no opinion on what the Court should decide. If the Conservatives REALLY are Conservatives that believe the Constitution is the LAW of the land they have to grant the case.

    But unless it can be shown that the convicted man was materially denied due process then it should fail.
     
  8. percysunshine
    Online

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    16,742
    Thanks Received:
    2,263
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +5,892
  9. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,795
    Thanks Received:
    6,625
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,112
    no percy, that makes no sense, what so ever.

    the States have no say, other than their state's federal representation in the u.s. house and senate, when it comes to ratifying treaties.

    The Constitution STATES SUCH.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Jack Fate
    Offline

    Jack Fate I'm Your Daddy

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    3,037
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northern Washington state
    Ratings:
    +338
    He is guilty. Due process is not going to change that fact.
     

Share This Page