Fmr_Army_MSgt.
Rookie
- Nov 26, 2012
- 47
- 7
- 0
- Banned
- #1
Judge Roy Moore could cause trouble for Obama with this case. Moore has already stated that Obama was in the wrong for ignoring the Constitution over the Libya scenario. This will be interesting indeed.
2nd bite to challenge Obama’s eligibility?
A longstanding eligibility case challenging Barack Obamas presence in the White House soon could be headed to the state Supreme Court in Alabama, where one justice already in a court filing has questioned the authenticity of Obamas documentation, and the incoming chief justice is a dyed-in-the-wool Constitution supporter with little tolerance for those who want to bypass the document.
This one, should it appear before the state Supreme Court as Klayman plans, would be before a panel where one judge at an earlier step in the case already has raised doubts about Obamas authenticity.
It was when the majority of the high court denied a petition filed by McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obamas birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the states ballot this year, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnishs charges of forgery were legitimate cause for concern.
Parker wrote, Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the short form and the long form birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.
The certain documentation Parker refers to is the findings of an investigation conducted by Arpaio.
2nd bite to challenge Obama’s eligibility?
A longstanding eligibility case challenging Barack Obamas presence in the White House soon could be headed to the state Supreme Court in Alabama, where one justice already in a court filing has questioned the authenticity of Obamas documentation, and the incoming chief justice is a dyed-in-the-wool Constitution supporter with little tolerance for those who want to bypass the document.
This one, should it appear before the state Supreme Court as Klayman plans, would be before a panel where one judge at an earlier step in the case already has raised doubts about Obamas authenticity.
It was when the majority of the high court denied a petition filed by McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obamas birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the states ballot this year, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnishs charges of forgery were legitimate cause for concern.
Parker wrote, Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the short form and the long form birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.
The certain documentation Parker refers to is the findings of an investigation conducted by Arpaio.
