After The Veto - What Now

What funding bill will pass?


  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .
After the generals LIED about their "success", the TRUTH was we were getting our butts kicked. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

Really? Who is this "we" of which you speak? Militarily, we (I was there...twice) kicked ass...maybe you need to read some history...the real thing, not the revisionist stuff they are teaching you in grade school.
 
Really? Who is this "we" of which you speak? Militarily, we (I was there...twice) kicked ass...maybe you need to read some history...the real thing, not the revisionist stuff they are teaching you in grade school.

The US NEVER lost a single battle in Viet Nam. The liberal media painted a picture of defeat and the people believed it

Now, the liberal media no longer has a death grip on how they report the news and the good news from Iraq is getting through

CSM - thank you for your service sir
 
Disparaging one the greatest humanitarians in our history, and a Nobel Prize winner as well. Are you still in high school, or what?
 
Disparaging one the greatest humanitarians in our history, and a Nobel Prize winner as well. Are you still in high school, or what?

I lived under Pres Peanut - the worst President the country ever had to endure

He was a fucking joke
 
The US NEVER lost a single battle in Viet Nam. The liberal media painted a picture of defeat and the people believed it

Now, the liberal media does not have a death grip on how they report the news and the good news from Iraq is getting through

CSM - thank you for your service sir

What HAS happened since VietNam is our enemies now know that they don't have to defeat the US military, they merely need to last long enough for the libs/Dems to get in office and hand them a victory.
 
What HAS happened since VietNam is our enemies now know that they don't have to defeat the US military, they merely need to last long enough for the libs/Dems to get in office and hand them a victory.

Dems have a long history of appeasemnt and the enemies of the US know they can always count on libs to roll over for them
 
Disparaging one the greatest humanitarians in our history, and a Nobel Prize winner as well. Are you still in high school, or what?

Great humanitarian....very lousy president. As for the Nobel Prize, you might want to look at some of the recent recipients before using that as a gauge. There are some very strange characters on that list.
 
Great humanitarian....very lousy president. As for the Nobel Prize, you might want to look at some of the recent recipients before using that as a gauge. There are some very strange characters on that list.

I remember they gave one to Yasser Arafat - a real warm and fuzzy terrorist
 
BUSH Jr is hands down the worst president in our history. Even worse than Nixon. Can't argue with the facts.

Under Carter the US had double digit inflation, double digit interest rate (home mortgages were around 17%) and high unemployment

Gas prices doubled overnight and cars lined up around the block to get gas

The economy was SO BAD, they created the Misery Index to rate the Carter economy

The top tax rate was 70%

Now, compare that mess to the Bush economy
 
We pulled out of Vietnam because we could not win the war for the south vietnamise. It was dragging on and not looking better, only scraficing our troops to the north. Thats why we pulled out, because everyone knew it was inevitable that the North would fight forever until we caved in and dropped the nukes, which we couldnt do. We just straight up could not win for the south because of poor strategy and many other reasons.
If people like RSR ran the country, he would believe that the US could win any war. And that my friend, is wrong. We can not win every single war and if we always thought the way you did, we would STILL be in vietnam until our very last troop was killed! Pride does not win wars.

Iraq is different, we have won the war, now we are baby sitting a monster. Thats basically a waste of time, and proves we should not have went in to begin with, Suddam did a better job of babysitting.
 
We pulled out of Vietnam because we could not win the war for the south vietnamise. It was dragging on and not looking better, only scraficing our troops to the north. Thats why we pulled out, because everyone knew it was inevitable that the North would fight forever until we caved in and dropped the nukes, which we couldnt do. We just straight up could not win for the south because of poor strategy and many other reasons.
If people like RSR ran the country, he would believe that the US could win any war. And that my friend, is wrong. We can not win every single war and if we always thought the way you did, we would STILL be in vietnam until our very last troop was killed! Pride does not win wars.

The US can WIN any war we get into. The US has the best trained and best armed military the world has ever seen

The US NEVER lost a battle in Viet Nam. It is a fact
 
Carter wasn't invading sovereign nations and killing thousands of innocent people. Now you could more accurately compare this to Hitler.
 
Carter wasn't invading sovereign nations and killing thousands of innocent people. Now you could more accurately compare this to Hitler.

Now Pres Peanut allowed Americans to help hostage for 444 days while he tried to make nice to terrorists

The same things libs are trying to do today
 

Forum List

Back
Top