Sit in a courtroom a few days and watch these black defendants in the courtroom. I have seen many innocent black men sent away simply because of their behavior. Why do they do it?
Wealth matters, uh huh, and there are no poor whites with court appointed attorneys or public defenders. All white people are rich. Yet a white guy even if guilty would walk when an innocent black man will be convicted. Why do they do it? Why do black defendants choose to act out some sort of urban rage in front of the jury?
I think there are multiple reasons. First, black kids are more likely to be exposed to trauma than white kids (statistically speaking). Trauma impacts a developing brain and can cause a near permanent flight/fight response to stress.
Second, poor socialization and conflict resolution skills at home and in their community. They model what they see acted out in front of them daily.
Third, poor legal representation. Most defendents require coaching before entering a courtroom.
Any of these things can happen to any defendent, but they are more likely to happen to someone from a poor, socially disorganized neighborhood, and blacks are much more likely than whites to reside in these conditions.
But this becomes awfully chicken-and-egg, no? The supply of excuses for black criminality never ends. They always "come from bad neighborhoods." But the neighborhoods are all black. Neighborhoods aren't "bad" -- they're populated by BAD PEOPLE. At some point, if you're not willing to admit that blacks are simply INHERENTLY more likely to be criminal, my patience runs out.
And to say that it's white lawyers' fault really takes the cake.
There is simply nobody out there forcing blacks to rape, rob, deal drugs and shoot (usually each other) to death. They're doing it themselves.
Nobody told Al Capone to line up six guys against a wall and machine gun them to death either.Nobody told those whites to grab a Black child and hang him or her from a tree either,and these bustards got away with it.