Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do you favor forced speech?
he doesn’t own his work. He was paid by HBO to act in the Sopronos. HBO owns the show.
this just proves he and cnn are too dumb to understand the law
Tell me that you don't know what the case was about without telling me that you don't know what the case was about.You fool. Feel free to point out where I said anything about favoring forced speech. Every citizen being treated equally is a far cry from forced speech. Quit reading things that aren't there
Now run along and go play with the rest of the children you fucking moron. You're dismissed.
Are you saying queer means happy and festive?He's not queer. Unless you're using the word queer to mean strange. But if you're using it to mean gay, he's not.
MSN And there you have it folks, He is oppsoed to the United States of America where everyone normal is treated equally, instead of abnormal behavior being rewarded with some type of trophy. So now this angry Marxist doesnt want anyone putting money into his coffers anymore, and soon when he is there in San Fransicko, drugging up and homeless, he will realize what a mistake it was to go against the country.
View attachment 800725
Why is the DOJ and the FBI?Why are you opposed to every U.S. citizen being treated equally?
And you're triggered as fuck about it. Mission accomplished.I happen to be neither a bigot nor a homophobe. But it probably isn’t up to me to define what some actor claims I am.
The point is: even if he imagines that I am on the list of people not permitted to view his old work, so what? He can’t control it.
So, clearly, he’s just making a silly virtue signaling announcement.
You can't watch 'The Sopranos'.Imperioli is a complete fool. And, like most leftoids, completely clueless.
You imbeciles always proclaim that I’m “triggered” when I’m not. I get it. You wish I were. But your constant false claims only serve to establish that you are even less reliable than previously thought.And you're triggered as fuck about it. Mission accomplished.
Oh wow, you found a flaming Libtard actor with something stupid to say. What no statement from Hanoi Jane?It hasn't taken long for the tit-fo-tat to open up over the SCOTUS decision on Colorado's public accommodations law. With the court now deciding that a product involving creative expression can be withheld if the creator doesn't like the buyer's lifestyle choices, why should an actor not also have a right to deny people access to their work as well?
There are a growing contingent of "Americans" who seem to think that the only way for a society to be free is to descend into endless tit-for-tat pokes in the eye every time someone doesn't like something about someone else. In the end, it can only lead to the disintegration of American society into little more than a tribal confederation, and that's only if it manages to avoid devolving entirely into petty city-states.
You cannot claim to believe in America as the greatest nation-state in the world, and that America should seek to remain the greatest, strongest, most powerful nation-state on God's green earth, while at the same time longing for it to devolve into a weak collection of loosely associated chiefdoms. China is rising and we are sinking. If you want to drive us down further then you aren't a patriot.
I’ve decided to forbid bigots and homophobes from watching The Sopranos, The White Lotus, Goodfellas or any movie or tv show I’ve been in,” Imperioli said in the caption of a post on his Instagram page Saturday, adding “Thank you Supreme Court for allowing me to discriminate and exclude those who I don’t agree with and am opposed to. USA! USA!”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/02/entertainment/michael-imperioli-supreme-court/index.html
Does this guy even own the rights to these movies?It hasn't taken long for the tit-fo-tat to open up over the SCOTUS decision on Colorado's public accommodations law. With the court now deciding that a product involving creative expression can be withheld if the creator doesn't like the buyer's lifestyle choices, why should an actor not also have a right to deny people access to their work as well?
There are a growing contingent of "Americans" who seem to think that the only way for a society to be free is to descend into endless tit-for-tat pokes in the eye every time someone doesn't like something about someone else. In the end, it can only lead to the disintegration of American society into little more than a tribal confederation, and that's only if it manages to avoid devolving entirely into petty city-states.
You cannot claim to believe in America as the greatest nation-state in the world, and that America should seek to remain the greatest, strongest, most powerful nation-state on God's green earth, while at the same time longing for it to devolve into a weak collection of loosely associated chiefdoms. China is rising and we are sinking. If you want to drive us down further then you aren't a patriot.
I’ve decided to forbid bigots and homophobes from watching The Sopranos, The White Lotus, Goodfellas or any movie or tv show I’ve been in,” Imperioli said in the caption of a post on his Instagram page Saturday, adding “Thank you Supreme Court for allowing me to discriminate and exclude those who I don’t agree with and am opposed to. USA! USA!”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/02/entertainment/michael-imperioli-supreme-court/index.html
It’s just fucking stupid. If they can’t force you to do business like the queers demand you do it they get all upset. It never dawns on these idiots freedom is a two way street.Wingnuts cried their eyes out when Sarah "The Pig" Sanders was refused service at that Virginia restaurant. But they want to deny services to whomever triggers them, under the guise of "religion".
Works for me. The artist has a right to his work. He was able to do that before the SCOTUS decision. Nothing has changed there.It hasn't taken long for the tit-fo-tat to open up over the SCOTUS decision on Colorado's public accommodations law. With the court now deciding that a product involving creative expression can be withheld if the creator doesn't like the buyer's lifestyle choices, why should an actor not also have a right to deny people access to their work as well?
There are a growing contingent of "Americans" who seem to think that the only way for a society to be free is to descend into endless tit-for-tat pokes in the eye every time someone doesn't like something about someone else. In the end, it can only lead to the disintegration of American society into little more than a tribal confederation, and that's only if it manages to avoid devolving entirely into petty city-states.
You cannot claim to believe in America as the greatest nation-state in the world, and that America should seek to remain the greatest, strongest, most powerful nation-state on God's green earth, while at the same time longing for it to devolve into a weak collection of loosely associated chiefdoms. China is rising and we are sinking. If you want to drive us down further then you aren't a patriot.
I’ve decided to forbid bigots and homophobes from watching The Sopranos, The White Lotus, Goodfellas or any movie or tv show I’ve been in,” Imperioli said in the caption of a post on his Instagram page Saturday, adding “Thank you Supreme Court for allowing me to discriminate and exclude those who I don’t agree with and am opposed to. USA! USA!”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/02/entertainment/michael-imperioli-supreme-court/index.html
Wingnuts cried their eyes out when Sarah "The Pig" Sanders was refused service at that Virginia restaurant. But they want to deny services to whomever triggers them, under the guise of "religion".
You ever notice these actors don’t mouth off until after they get millions in the bank?Works for me. The artist has a right to his work. He was able to do that before the SCOTUS decision. Nothing has changed there.
