ACLU sues healthcare network for cancelling chest surgery of woman who identifies as man

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MindWars, Dec 30, 2017.

  1. RoshawnMarkwees
    Online

    RoshawnMarkwees Assimilationist

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,488
    Thanks Received:
    1,800
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Middle class, suburban ghetto.
    Ratings:
    +8,884
    Legal marriage provides tax breaks. That is a subsidy. Subsidizing homos no longer makes their irrelevant behavior choice irrelevant.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Skylar
    Offline

    Skylar Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    29,469
    Thanks Received:
    4,104
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,204
    Again, the right to marry cannot be conditioned on the ability or intent to procreate. Making your 'necessary parent' nonsense just meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.

    No such requirement exists.

    And same sex couples getting married and having kids doesn't effect you.
     
  3. RoshawnMarkwees
    Online

    RoshawnMarkwees Assimilationist

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,488
    Thanks Received:
    1,800
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Middle class, suburban ghetto.
    Ratings:
    +8,884
    Anything involving legally mandated coercion is not a right.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Skylar
    Offline

    Skylar Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    29,469
    Thanks Received:
    4,104
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,204
    The participants in the marriage aren’t coerced, they are quite willing. Nixing your latest round of meaningless pseudo-legal nonsense.

    Again, a same sex couple is married.....and nothing happens to you. Their right to marry sinply doesn’t effect you.
     
  5. Silhouette
    Offline

    Silhouette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,948
    Thanks Received:
    1,606
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +8,186
    I thought this thread was about Dr.s & insurance cos pulling out of elective amputation of vital healthy organs?
     
  6. Silhouette
    Offline

    Silhouette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,948
    Thanks Received:
    1,606
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +8,186
    I would say the litmus test would be actual damage to normal organs. And, gender appropriate. So if you're a dude and your dick gets caught in the lawn mower, then yeah, insurance pays for a new dick or whatever. If you're a lady and you have breast cancer, insurance pays to improve your self esteem with implants, but not a penis, because you're a woman. Seems pretty simple.

    Insurers and doctors are shying away from the medical malpractice they had NO BUSINESS being involved with doing in the first place. The ACLU has its hands full since in order to win, they'll have to actually prove that these procedures are medically necessary and effect the changes they say they do. Since no doctor will ever take the stand and say "yes a man can become a woman" or the opposite, the ACLU will lose this case. All it will take is for the judges to review the waiver forms that doctors make patients sign before the amputation of healthy vital organs begins.

    Game over.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. OffensivelyOpenMinded
    Offline

    OffensivelyOpenMinded BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2016
    Messages:
    9,612
    Thanks Received:
    1,066
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Where I Is
    Ratings:
    +8,049
    Same sex couples don't "have kids". You need to go back to school.
     

Share This Page