Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,229
- 793
- 140
" ACA - Single-Payer \/ Multi-Player /\/ \/\ Hybrid ? "
* Free Enterprise Money Multipliers Compelled To Spend *
Is the Affordable Care Act A single-payer or a multi-payer system Or single-multi-payer hybrid ?
* Open Questions *
Within the 100% to 400% poverty line , which percentage of those individuals have adopted the health insurance program and what are its satisfaction ratings ?
* Free Enterprise Money Multipliers Compelled To Spend *
Is the Affordable Care Act A single-payer or a multi-payer system Or single-multi-payer hybrid ?
" Equal Endowment Challenging Positive Liberties "
* CBO Assessing Affordability Groups "
A technical element within the ACA that may be unconstitutional is whether the government is capable of fining individuals for not having health insurance when their net earnings are greater than 400% of the poverty line .
It is certainly clear that those between 100% and 400% are being taxed under the ACA because only a portion of total costs to purchase private health care insurance is being remitted back to those taxpayers .
For those with earnings between 100-400% who optioned to purchase a plan compliant with the ACA , did the portion of uncompensated costs for monthly premiums make individual health affordable and effective for the group , as would be expected for just compensation from property being taken by government in the form of a forced financial transaction ?
Consider if the ACA were to compensate individuals with earnings above 400% of the poverty line ; would remitting all but some portion of health care costs be consistent with a constitutional requirement for receiving just compensation ?
How does the portion of uncompensated costs for monthly premiums paid by individuals in the 100-400% translate into a congruent proportion of respective health care costs to government ?
How does the portion of uncompensated costs for monthly premiums paid by individuals over 400% translate into a congruent proportion of respective health care costs to government ?
When government chose to subsidize health insurance premiums for the earnings range of 100-400% , was that group chosen as those most representative of costs to government health care ?
If those above 400% also represent a significant portion of those most representative of costs to government health care , why were proportional incentives as tax credits not extended to those with earnings greater than 400% of the poverty line ?
* Open Questions *
Within the 100% to 400% poverty line , which percentage of those individuals have adopted the health insurance program and what are its satisfaction ratings ?