About rightful racism as opposed to hating a race just because of racial differences

[northpolarbear]

I couldn't get any debate from some other forum (no one responding), so re-posting here.

About rightful racism as opposed to hating a race just because of racial differences.

First of all, I don't consider this racism. Second of all, whether this is called racism or not (you grouping it with the racism of hating a race just because of being a different race is an equivocation; they are still different), it is right (rightful & moral). Third of all, it is legal anyway; the laws do not force you in these.

I want to talk about the different forms of racism. I don't consider this racism, but let's just call this "many different forms of racism" for now. It is a rightful racism.

It is within my right to not date an Asian because of the unique unfavorable facial traits (see my photo if you want to bullshit this as racism; "that" is the point I want to make) which "happen to apply" in the unit of race. In the reality, you just want to date pretty faces "regardless of the race". You just don't want to date ugly faces "regardless of race". Some types of "ugly faces" (let's not get into what ugly is as such is just deterrence & henpecking) just happen to belong in the unit of race. You are not hating that racial face just because of it is a different face; you hate it because it is ugly; it is just that the ugly face happens to be in the unit of race when it might as well be in the unit of "the family next door" or "the town over there". Another example & point I want to make is about hating a country. If a country did something wrong to you, you can hate it rightfully. You are not hating it just because it is a different country. You are hating it because it did something wrong; it is just that the culprits just happen to be in the unit of country when it can just as well be in the unit of a town within your own country or a giant corporation. The same logic goes for the unit of an ethnicity, race or whatever in terms of hating it because "you did something wrong", not because you are a different group.

The idea is that whether something is rightful or not is dependent only on the action itself regardless of the unit. If something is rightful on some other unit, then it should be rightful in the unit of race as well. As for being rightful on some other unit, it is entitled morally & rightfully (there's nothing wrong with it aside from being your rightful, natural, valid, consequential, logical response), not just legally (it is your legal right as well). Hence, even when the unit happens to become in the unit of race, it is still rightful because the action itself is a rightful action. That's the logic.

 

[aaronleland]

You are a bad driver, and you have a small dick. Now get back to the kitchen, and make my General Tso's.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I couldn't get any debate from some other forum (no one responding), so re-posting here.

About rightful racism as opposed to hating a race just because of racial differences.

First of all, I don't consider this racism. Second of all, whether this is called racism or not (you grouping it with the racism of hating a race just because of being a different race is an equivocation; they are still different), it is right (rightful & moral). Third of all, it is legal anyway; the laws do not force you in these.

I want to talk about the different forms of racism. I don't consider this racism, but let's just call this "many different forms of racism" for now. It is a rightful racism.

It is within my right to not date an Asian because of the unique unfavorable facial traits (see my photo if you want to bullshit this as racism; "that" is the point I want to make) which "happen to apply" in the unit of race. In the reality, you just want to date pretty faces "regardless of the race". You just don't want to date ugly faces "regardless of race". Some types of "ugly faces" (let's not get into what ugly is as such is just deterrence & henpecking) just happen to belong in the unit of race. You are not hating that racial face just because of it is a different face; you hate it because it is ugly; it is just that the ugly face happens to be in the unit of race when it might as well be in the unit of "the family next door" or "the town over there". Another example & point I want to make is about hating a country. If a country did something wrong to you, you can hate it rightfully. You are not hating it just because it is a different country. You are hating it because it did something wrong; it is just that the culprits just happen to be in the unit of country when it can just as well be in the unit of a town within your own country or a giant corporation. The same logic goes for the unit of an ethnicity, race or whatever in terms of hating it because "you did something wrong", not because you are a different group.

The idea is that whether something is rightful or not is dependent only on the action itself regardless of the unit. If something is rightful on some other unit, then it should be rightful in the unit of race as well. As for being rightful on some other unit, it is entitled morally & rightfully (there's nothing wrong with it aside from being your rightful, natural, valid, consequential, logical response), not just legally (it is your legal right as well). Hence, even when the unit happens to become in the unit of race, it is still rightful because the action itself is a rightful action. That's the logic.

Did you take your Truvada today?

BTW, the word "rightful" as I think you mean it does not exist.

An English course for you, perhaps?

And finally, there is NEVER justification for racism of any kind at all. NADA. ZILCH. NIX DA.

 

[northpolarbear]

I am not a Chinese & I don't even look Chinese. Also, the word rightful clearly exists in dictionary however you want to bullshit philosophically which is no more deterrence than claiming what ugly is.

 

[Pete7469]

Look...

Racism is simple.

If you "think" you're superior to other people because of your ethnicity or skin color, you're a "racist" and a fuckin moron.

If you "think" people who have certain ethnic heritage or have different skin pigments are inferior or deserve contempt for those reasons alone you're a racist and a fuckin moron.

If you prefer the companionship, friendship or relationship with some people based on how they look you're a normal human being. If you have disdain for certain cultures and beliefs or hold people in contempt because they do shit that irritates you, you're responding naturally.

If you're afraid to express yourself because you don't want to be called a bigot, or you condemn people who express themselves because you're programmed to call them bigots you're a bed wetter and a fuckin moron.

I hope this helps.

 

[northpolarbear]

By rightful, think "entitled", just, natural, consequential. It was obvious. Rightful as in "that should happen".

 

[northpolarbear]

The point is how that is not racism & how that is a rightful racism even if you call it that.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I am not a Chinese & I don't even look Chinese. Also, the word rightful clearly exists in dictionary however you want to bullshit philosophically which is no more deterrence than claiming what ugly is.

Who ever claimed that you are Chinese? I don't care what you are. We are all homo sapiens. That makes me far more open and accepting than you will ever be.

 

[northpolarbear]

Also, when certain attributes happen to be assigned better or inconvenient to the unit of race, then that is just how the truth is. For example, Caucasian is more "Western" ideal of beauty whether you call it good looking or not. There shouldn't be any distortion of facts just because that exposes how some race is "better" or "less convenient" in any attribute.

 

[Hossfly]

In my book, people are people and one is equal to the other.

 

[northpolarbear]

Tso chicken is Chinese I think. Hence, I made the point that I'm not Chinese & I don't even look like 1 if you've ever been around a group of Chinese.

This is not about open mindness but about the "actual reality" & the facts as well as rightful entitlements. Not to mention how you pausing your thinking is clearly not about open mindness but clearly about how you want to see & what you want to have.

 

[northpolarbear]

You are making a high level indepth debate into a low level trivial nonsense. Of course all people are people & of course they have rights. That has nothing to do with how this is not racism & how it is a rightful racism even if you choose to pursue equivocation.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

I couldn't get any debate from some other forum (no one responding), so re-posting here.

About rightful racism as opposed to hating a race just because of racial differences.

First of all, I don't consider this racism. Second of all, whether this is called racism or not (you grouping it with the racism of hating a race just because of being a different race is an equivocation; they are still different), it is right (rightful & moral). Third of all, it is legal anyway; the laws do not force you in these.

I want to talk about the different forms of racism. I don't consider this racism, but let's just call this "many different forms of racism" for now. It is a rightful racism.

It is within my right to not date an Asian because of the unique unfavorable facial traits (see my photo if you want to bullshit this as racism; "that" is the point I want to make) which "happen to apply" in the unit of race. In the reality, you just want to date pretty faces "regardless of the race". You just don't want to date ugly faces "regardless of race". Some types of "ugly faces" (let's not get into what ugly is as such is just deterrence & henpecking) just happen to belong in the unit of race. You are not hating that racial face just because of it is a different face; you hate it because it is ugly; it is just that the ugly face happens to be in the unit of race when it might as well be in the unit of "the family next door" or "the town over there". Another example & point I want to make is about hating a country. If a country did something wrong to you, you can hate it rightfully. You are not hating it just because it is a different country. You are hating it because it did something wrong; it is just that the culprits just happen to be in the unit of country when it can just as well be in the unit of a town within your own country or a giant corporation. The same logic goes for the unit of an ethnicity, race or whatever in terms of hating it because "you did something wrong", not because you are a different group.

The idea is that whether something is rightful or not is dependent only on the action itself regardless of the unit. If something is rightful on some other unit, then it should be rightful in the unit of race as well. As for being rightful on some other unit, it is entitled morally & rightfully (there's nothing wrong with it aside from being your rightful, natural, valid, consequential, logical response), not just legally (it is your legal right as well). Hence, even when the unit happens to become in the unit of race, it is still rightful because the action itself is a rightful action. That's the logic.

Sounds more akin to the joke of black men preferring to date white women, or at least not black ones than actual racism or bigotry. A preference is not necessarily racist or bigoted.

 

[northpolarbear]

Of course all people have equal values & equal rights. So what? That is not pertinent to this topic.

 

[northpolarbear]

Yes, it's like black people preferring to date white woman. I prefer white woman too, & it is my right instead of "racism" against Asians.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Yes, it's like black people preferring to date white woman. I prefer white woman too, & it is my right instead of "racism" against Asians.

Penis is a penis, vagina a vagina. Close your eyes and racial preferences disappear.

 

[Pete7469]

Who ever claimed that you are Chinese? I don't care what you are. We are all homo sapiens. That makes me far more open and accepting than you will ever be.

It amazes me how bed wetters like you can say "We are all homo sapiens" in one sentence displaying what might be construed as a cogent point and in the next sentence spew some self aggrandizing bullshit declaring yourself superior.

You're no better than the OP, in fact you're one of the biggest imbeciles I've ever come across. I can't believe you've lived long enough to learn how to turn on a computer without having walked in front of a truck.

 

[Pete7469]

Yes, it's like black people preferring to date white woman. I prefer white woman too, & it is my right instead of "racism" against Asians.

Penis is a penis, vagina a vagina. Close your eyes and racial preferences disappear.

So you close your eyes when blowing a vagina?

 

[northpolarbear]

Or I can just date white woman without having to close my eyes. Anyway, the point works in any attribute, not just face. I was talking in general.

 

[DGS49]

Allow me to cite a bit of wisdom from Louis Farrakhan. At one time, he famously said (not verbatim), "Anti-Semite used to mean someone who hates Jews; it has come to mean someone whom Jews don't like."

And so it is with "racist." In our culture, a "racist" is anyone whom Liberals don't like because of any comment about any person who is, or who is perceived to be, "different."

People who oppose illegal immigration are "racist." You could look it up. The fact that Mexicans are the same race as Europeans is irrelevant. People who point out that Blacks, in general, do anything, say anything, feel anything, or look a certain way, are "racist." The arguable truth of the observation is irrelevant.

In our culture, with black African physical traits are not perceived to be attractive. And that's a kind understatement. Even "Black" women agree, because they do everything they can to negate their natural hair, their natural skin color, and so on. Parenthetically, one might note that white-on-Black rape does not exist. Essentially never happens. It's ignored in FBI statistics because it is so rare as not to be measurable. Black women in porn are near non-existent. Nobody fantasizes about copulating with Serena Williams.

Black women who essentially look like beautiful white women who happen to have dark-pigmented skin are undeniably pretty. there are numerous examples. But women who have Black hair, Black lips, Black noses, and Black skin tone...forget about it.

And having typed these facts, most who read them - especially those who have been brainwashed by the American public school system - will have already branded me a "racist."

If I point out that "Black" basketball players have longer arms and legs, proportionately, than people of European stock, and that trait, along with dramatically more "fast twitch" muscles, is what makes them better basketball players. It's not playing endlessly in playgrounds when they are young; lots of white kids do the same, but they can't jump up, spin around, go out for coffee, and dunk a basketball on the way back down to earth. No white person can do that. Never happen.

And making this observation - not even controversial to anyone not blinded by politically correct sunglasses - makes me a racist.

I have to life with that, I suppose.