About implied sex on screen, nudity or simply relaxing on a front porch for coffee it is difficult to understand why some lose it over such activity

how do you know people are watching things they dont like??

got any examples??

and yes the democrat party and their supporters are arguing that children should be allowed to see adult sexual content,, and in many cases shown on this forum are already doing it,,

FFS one of the books they complain that are being banned walks children through how to suck dick and even have pictures to show the right way,,
what nonsense ...... lies lies and misinformation = fake republicans

"Most people who walk around nude in public want you to look, and be offended, they get off on it"

More lies and nonsense
 
what nonsense ...... lies lies and misinformation = fake republicans

"Most people who walk around nude in public want you to look, and be offended, they get off on it"

More lies and nonsense
in 58 yrs I have never seen a person walk around in public nude,,
 
Noticed your examples didn't have much in the way of public nudity and sex.

SMH.

Why do people not run around nude in public?
The strange part is nudity and sex in public iv rare and not shown on the news.
,Yet violence and even murder has become not only common, but shown on the news and social media.

Children have probably seen more murders and assaults.
 
lets get back to this naked children splashing in the mud,,
is seeing this common in your life and do you like watching them??
Strangely, this is common in so called "primitive cultures"
We have to get our children to "bite the apple" (biblical reference)
 
There is nudity and everyday in millions of homes worldwide. There is sex everyday in millions of homes, college dorms, on nude beaches , motels/hotels etc etc etc ...........

What is the concern none of the above is necessarily porn......
^ 🤪
 
Exposure of the human female body has made great strides in recent history. It was not so long ago that young men were thrilled to see a girl's bare ankle, and would congregate at trolley stops in the hope of seeing one as the women of the day got on board.

Most women's clothing - especially "fashion" clothing - is designed by men, and when designing clothing for young women, they do their best to call attention to the shapes of a woman's body that indicate fecundity...nice boobs, shapely butt, flat stomach, etc. While women almost universally deny any intention to use "fashionable" clothing to attract young men, it is a lie. It is the attention of young men that they crave; the pisser is that often the young men who are attracted are repulsive themselves, leading to many unpleasant exchanges between "attractive" young women and repulsive young men. (This is closely related to the InCel phenomenon of recent years).

But one perverse fact about the exposure of flesh for the purpose of sexual attraction is that over-exposure can be gross and have the opposite effect. My son was of the generation in which Britney Spears was the universal Hottie. Her clothing exposed a lot of skin, and on her it looked fabulous. But when the average pudgy late-teenage girl wore the same things, with rolls of flab cascading out of the shorts and midriff tops, it was - shall we say - not a good look. Repulsive, in fact.

The OP alludes to full nudity, and says, in effect, "Why not?" Many reasons. First, only a small fraction of women, and a microscopic fraction of men look good in the nude. What about the rest of us? What about the bigger problem of those who THINK they look good but do not? Second, exposure to this sort of attraction can become routine, boring, and tiresome. What is shocking at first glance shortly becomes mundane and eventually boring. If public nudity became popular, I guarantee that within a few months, clothing designers would figure out ways of making clothing more sexy-looking than nudity. It would not be difficult. I can think of several film starlets who look ravishing and sexy in their designer clothes, but would be significantly less so it they bared it all.

Morally, there is NO CASE TO BE MADE that female sexy attire a good thing. Countless studies have shown that relationships built solely on sexual attraction are the first to fail. Look at the long-lasting marriages in "Hollywood." The ones that last are when the Big Star marries someone who is not terribly attractive. They see so many repulsive, self-centered beauties in the course of their careers that they understand the truth of the axiom that Beauty is only skin deep.
 
Depends on how gratuitous it is.....If it fits in the storyline then fine.

I mean I expect to see T&A if the scene is in a strip club or some such.

Wasting screen time on a shower shot for no other reason than to show, however briefly, a bit of T&A of some featured actress, not so much.

Nothing wrong with a little T&A mind you but everything in it's place. Don't cheapen a film just for T&A's sake.

I noticed it in the film Whiteout the other day.....The Kate Beckinsale two minute+ shower scene was unnecessary and a dick tease.....It added shit-all to the film.
 
the USA isnt a primitive culture,,

do you like watching children run around naked??
Strangely, the assaults upon children that happen in our "civilized" society, don't occur in those so called "primative cultures". You would think that everyone going around naked / half naked would put children at risk, but there's no sign of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top