Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?“It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation of the life of a new individual.”Not a real science site, just a bunch of religious nuts.An egg isn’t a chicken.Not according to the definition of life and not according to science.That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.
Got a link to science?
A Scientific View of When Life Begins | Charlotte Lozier Institute
"...The conclusion that human life begins at sperm-egg fusion is uncontested, objective, based on the universally accepted scientific method of distinguishing different cell types from each other and on ample scientific evidence (thousands of independent, peer-reviewed publications)..."
Clark Edward and Corliss Patten’s Human Embryology, McGraw – Hill Inc., 30
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Embryology-Bradley-Merrill-Patten/dp/0070131503&tag=ff0d01-20
At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.Which is when according to you?What is not a hard concept is when human life begins.
Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
So then go away, I didn’t invite you here.What does that have to do with anything?That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.Which is when according to you?That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.Which is when according to you?
Biology Fail and denial is not an argument.
You should consider educating yourself about "placental mammals" (which includes humans) and also start educating yourself about how and when a mammals biological aging begins.
If you are actually that clueless?
I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you.
You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.Exactly, which is why your beliefs are meaningless on these subjects. You don't care enough to dig deeper.I’m agnostic about all those questions.Is that why you exist now? Why do you need something to do? Why would your existence be important?Maybe there is no reason except to travel through time with something to do.I don’t think they believe in aliens, just reincarnation. The thing is that people who believe in reincarnation typically believe that there is a reason and purpose to it.
So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?“It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation of the life of a new individual.”Not a real science site, just a bunch of religious nuts.An egg isn’t a chicken.Not according to the definition of life and not according to science.
Got a link to science?
A Scientific View of When Life Begins | Charlotte Lozier Institute
"...The conclusion that human life begins at sperm-egg fusion is uncontested, objective, based on the universally accepted scientific method of distinguishing different cell types from each other and on ample scientific evidence (thousands of independent, peer-reviewed publications)..."
Clark Edward and Corliss Patten’s Human Embryology, McGraw – Hill Inc., 30
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Embryology-Bradley-Merrill-Patten/dp/0070131503&tag=ff0d01-20
“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
The medical textbook, Before We Are Born – Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects, states:So then go away, I didn’t invite you here.What does that have to do with anything?That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
Biology Fail and denial is not an argument.
You should consider educating yourself about "placental mammals" (which includes humans) and also start educating yourself about how and when a mammals biological aging begins.
If you are actually that clueless?
I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you.
(QUESTIONs)At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
The medical textbook, Before We Are Born – Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects, states:So then go away, I didn’t invite you here.What does that have to do with anything?That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.
Biology Fail and denial is not an argument.
You should consider educating yourself about "placental mammals" (which includes humans) and also start educating yourself about how and when a mammals biological aging begins.
If you are actually that clueless?
I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you.
“The zygote and early embryo are living human organisms.”
Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud Before We Are Born – Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects (W.B. Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition.) Page 500
https://www.amazon.com/Before-Are-Born-Essentials-Embryology/dp/1437720013&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.Exactly, which is why your beliefs are meaningless on these subjects. You don't care enough to dig deeper.I’m agnostic about all those questions.Is that why you exist now? Why do you need something to do? Why would your existence be important?Maybe there is no reason except to travel through time with something to do.
“The term conception refers to the union of the male and female pronuclear elements of procreation from which a new living being develops. It is synonymous with the terms fecundation, impregnation, and fertilization … The zygote thus formed represents the beginning of a new life.”“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
I'm always suspicious when religious nutters cut and paste material they have edited.
The extremist religious nutters mewl that a single fertilized cell is a person and advocate that the State seize control of the womb at that point. The vast majority of rational Americans recognize that personhood evolves during gestation as brain waves are first evidenced and independent viability achieved. Thus, Rowe vs Wade is a reasonable compromise.
Look up reincarnation.So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?“It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation of the life of a new individual.”Not a real science site, just a bunch of religious nuts.An egg isn’t a chicken.
Got a link to science?
A Scientific View of When Life Begins | Charlotte Lozier Institute
"...The conclusion that human life begins at sperm-egg fusion is uncontested, objective, based on the universally accepted scientific method of distinguishing different cell types from each other and on ample scientific evidence (thousands of independent, peer-reviewed publications)..."
Clark Edward and Corliss Patten’s Human Embryology, McGraw – Hill Inc., 30
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Embryology-Bradley-Merrill-Patten/dp/0070131503&tag=ff0d01-20
Can you prove that souls exist?
Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.Exactly, which is why your beliefs are meaningless on these subjects. You don't care enough to dig deeper.I’m agnostic about all those questions.Is that why you exist now? Why do you need something to do? Why would your existence be important?
Never said they weren’t.The medical textbook, Before We Are Born – Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects, states:So then go away, I didn’t invite you here.What does that have to do with anything?That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.That’s not human life, that’s a tiny embryo or fetus.
Biology Fail and denial is not an argument.
You should consider educating yourself about "placental mammals" (which includes humans) and also start educating yourself about how and when a mammals biological aging begins.
If you are actually that clueless?
I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you.
“The zygote and early embryo are living human organisms.”
Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud Before We Are Born – Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects (W.B. Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition.) Page 500
https://www.amazon.com/Before-Are-Born-Essentials-Embryology/dp/1437720013&tag=ff0d01-20
Not no proof, just not enough.Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.Exactly, which is why your beliefs are meaningless on these subjects. You don't care enough to dig deeper.I’m agnostic about all those questions.
My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Yes it is.pro choice is not pro abortion.
None, zero, nada, zilch.Not no proof, just not enough.Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.Exactly, which is why your beliefs are meaningless on these subjects. You don't care enough to dig deeper.
