Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,459
- 847
- 140
" Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision "
* Opening Post Circumstance As A Premise Of Contention *
...
"FACE was intended to protect a 'right' to abortion that thus never existed, and, as such, the fate of FACE attaches to and follows perfectly the fate of Roe," Kopp wrote in the court papers. "Since Roe is now overturned FACE also is now gone and never existed."
FACE, however, still exists and is enforced.
* Perspective Premise On Contention Is That Roe V Wade Is Not Over Ruled By Set Aside By Sedition Of Us 14th 9th 1st Amendments *
#Dobbs is #DumbFounded and #SeditionLaw against US 14th , 9th and 1st amendments .
@ReproRights presented an INEPT WRIGHT TO PRIVACY premise and NOT A LIVE BIRTH premise of #RoeVWade , that is clear from alito response !
" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. "
None should need to explain a " Logically , of course " deduction by us constitution to a supreme court justice !
Blackmun wrote in RoeVWade , " Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth. "
Thus , at post natural viability , an ability to survive an imminent live birth was substituted In lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , which was referenced as a " potential life " .
That is , except for a live birth requirement , all circumstances to become a US citizen are incidental .
So , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .
So , in US 10th , by US 14th and by US 9th , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .
Any US citizen has legal standing to prevail against state interests to proscribe abortion as a violation of the equal protection clause of US 14th amendment .
" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "
* Rebuttal To Claimant Seeking Dismissal Of Murder Charges *
By equitable doctrine , where an individual removes a wright to life of another individual as defines murder , a potential exists where the wright to life of the murderer could be removed , albeit by due process .
As a zygote , or embryo , or fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , each is without constitutional protections , and it therefore not possible to have removed a wright to life , by which to enforce a death penalty as capital punishment , such that the petition to dismiss murder charges is dismissed .
That yearn zealous fervor for martyrdom through homicide , based on ignorance for the dumbfounded , is pitiful .
#AbortionChoice , #AbortionChoiceRepublicans , #ProChoiceRepublicans , #RoeVWade.
* Opening Post Circumstance As A Premise Of Contention *
Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'
James Kopp, an anti-abortion activist who murdered an abortion provider, contends that a conviction should be tossed because of the SCOTUS decision that overturned Roe versus Wade.
www.yahoo.com
Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because abortion right 'does not exist'
James Charles Kopp, a radical anti-abortion activist who in 1998 murdered a western New York abortion provider, contends that his federal convictions should be dismissed because of the year-old Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe versus Wade....
"FACE was intended to protect a 'right' to abortion that thus never existed, and, as such, the fate of FACE attaches to and follows perfectly the fate of Roe," Kopp wrote in the court papers. "Since Roe is now overturned FACE also is now gone and never existed."
FACE, however, still exists and is enforced.
* Perspective Premise On Contention Is That Roe V Wade Is Not Over Ruled By Set Aside By Sedition Of Us 14th 9th 1st Amendments *
#Dobbs is #DumbFounded and #SeditionLaw against US 14th , 9th and 1st amendments .
@ReproRights presented an INEPT WRIGHT TO PRIVACY premise and NOT A LIVE BIRTH premise of #RoeVWade , that is clear from alito response !
" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. "
None should need to explain a " Logically , of course " deduction by us constitution to a supreme court justice !
Blackmun wrote in RoeVWade , " Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth. "
Thus , at post natural viability , an ability to survive an imminent live birth was substituted In lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , which was referenced as a " potential life " .
That is , except for a live birth requirement , all circumstances to become a US citizen are incidental .
So , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .
So , in US 10th , by US 14th and by US 9th , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .
Any US citizen has legal standing to prevail against state interests to proscribe abortion as a violation of the equal protection clause of US 14th amendment .
" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "
Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade
" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...
usmessageboard.com
* Rebuttal To Claimant Seeking Dismissal Of Murder Charges *
By equitable doctrine , where an individual removes a wright to life of another individual as defines murder , a potential exists where the wright to life of the murderer could be removed , albeit by due process .
As a zygote , or embryo , or fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , each is without constitutional protections , and it therefore not possible to have removed a wright to life , by which to enforce a death penalty as capital punishment , such that the petition to dismiss murder charges is dismissed .
That yearn zealous fervor for martyrdom through homicide , based on ignorance for the dumbfounded , is pitiful .
#AbortionChoice , #AbortionChoiceRepublicans , #ProChoiceRepublicans , #RoeVWade.
Last edited: