koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,131
- 14,029
- 2,190
No, it's not. Once again you prove what a clueless retard you are.
If you make a moronic statement like "All the babies that live briefly after abortion are so hideously deformed they would have died anyway" the standard dictates you provide supporting evidence. If somebody challenges you to support an idiotic statement, and you don't, then the assumption is that you are lying and making shit up.
That might be true, if that is what I said, but it is not. Once again you are misquoting me.
See how that works, genius?
YOU make the statement, YOU prove it. This is a debate standard that 5th graders understand and are held to in grade school.
Here let me help you, even wiki understands this stuff:
"Argument from ignorance"
"It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is "generally accepted" (or vice versa). "
"Arguments that appeal to ignorance rely merely on the fact that the veracity of the proposition is not disproven to arrive at a definite conclusion. "
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You made an accusation, based upon the testimony of this Jill whatever-her-name-is.
I made a statement that contradicted said accusation, saying that the hospital was performing late term abortions in cases of hideous and life-ending mutations and abnormalities. And that in these cases, the fetuses survived after being removed from the mother's body, due to their advanced stage of development.
Is there some evidence that you can produce that fetuses of less than 24 weeks are surviving for any length of time outside the womb?
IN addition, I made a statement saying that I believed if they had performed abortions after the age of viability, as dictated by Roe v Wade, then they were murderers, and should be tried as such.
Prove your point, retard. Otherwise quit sucking the life out of the thread.