A solution for Abortionists and Anti-abortionists...

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
28,465
10,042
900
CORRECTION on the type of abortion replacement, i.e. using an existing fetus....
Finally, not long ago, it was suggested -and some experiments made-that the oocytes be removed from aborted fetuses for use in fertilization, thus adding to the unacceptability of heterologous fertilization the macabre prospect of a genetic mother who was never born.

So why not work together to help women that can't have the baby either due to health or financial or simply don't want to have the baby have the fetus transferred for now to women that will be paid to birth the baby?
Solution is good for all parties. Plus there is a major problem brewing!!!

Population replacement-level threatened!​

How Low Can America’s Birth Rate Go Before It’s A Problem?​

The U.S. fertility rate hit a record low in 2020 — just as it did in 2019, and 2018. Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.


So why don't both sides of the issue work to allow women who don't or can't give birth that are pregnant be able to fix the
very necessary “replacement-level fertility” issue at the same time?
 
Last edited:
I'm pro-life but telling people they must allow themselves to be cut open to handle their issue is not a solution.
 
The lowering birth rate really only threatens the socialist ponzi scheme of a government rabidly endeavoring to grow itself.
 
The lowering birth rate really only threatens the socialist ponzi scheme of a government rabidly endeavoring to grow itself.
That is why they opened the borders silly.

No, the main focus of globalist Nazis is population control. That is why the support abortion, sexual perversion that won't lead to reproduction, and the inner city killing fields of black neighborhoods all across the US, etc. Virtually any policy that will lead to more death and less life they support. Destroying the world economies is but one more plan..
 
More abortions adds up to fewer libtards....
Nope. What kids do survive the Left wing genocide will promptly be taken to reeducation centers called public schools.

In addition, those that survive the increased violence and drug use and pandemic related crap and lawlessness will be faced with no economic future thanks to government spending.
 
So why not work together to help women that can't have the baby either due to health or financial or simply don't want to have the baby have the fetus transferred for now to women that will be paid to birth the baby?
It was a uterus transplant, not a fetal transplant. The woman received a dead person's uterus, THEN got pregnant.
 
You’re probably familiar with the idea of a kidney, liver or heart transplant, but uterine transplant is a rapidly evolving field, says maternal-fetal medicine specialist Uma Perni, MD, who was part of the mother’s care team.
So why not work together to help women that can't have the baby either due to health or financial or simply don't want to have the baby have the fetus transferred for now to women that will be paid to birth the baby?
Solution is good for all parties. Plus there is a major problem brewing!!!

Population replacement-level threatened!​

How Low Can America’s Birth Rate Go Before It’s A Problem?​

The U.S. fertility rate hit a record low in 2020 — just as it did in 2019, and 2018. Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.


So why don't both sides of the issue work to allow women who don't or can't give birth that are pregnant be able to fix the
very necessary “replacement-level fertility” issue at the same time?
Leftists don't compromise. That is the beauty of socialism, it's so damned good it must be forced on everyone.

They already have power, so why would they lower themselves to share it?
 
Nope. What kids do survive the Left wing genocide will promptly be taken to reeducation centers called public schools.

In addition, those that survive the increased violence and drug use and pandemic related crap and lawlessness will be faced with no economic future thanks to government spending.
Good point...
 
It was a uterus transplant, not a fetal transplant. The woman received a dead person's uterus, THEN got pregnant.
You are right! I quoted the wrong process. I corrected with the below
Finally, not long ago, it was suggested -and some experiments made-that the oocytes be removed from aborted fetuses for use in fertilization, thus adding to the unacceptability of heterologous fertilization the macabre prospect of a genetic mother who was never born.
 
CORRECTION on the type of abortion replacement, i.e. using an existing fetus....
Finally, not long ago, it was suggested -and some experiments made-that the oocytes be removed from aborted fetuses for use in fertilization, thus adding to the unacceptability of heterologous fertilization the macabre prospect of a genetic mother who was never born.

So why not work together to help women that can't have the baby either due to health or financial or simply don't want to have the baby have the fetus transferred for now to women that will be paid to birth the baby?
Solution is good for all parties. Plus there is a major problem brewing!!!

Population replacement-level threatened!​

How Low Can America’s Birth Rate Go Before It’s A Problem?​

The U.S. fertility rate hit a record low in 2020 — just as it did in 2019, and 2018. Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.


So why don't both sides of the issue work to allow women who don't or can't give birth that are pregnant be able to fix the
very necessary “replacement-level fertility” issue at the same time?

How about just opening the country up to immigration? Problem solved.

Women aren't having babies because THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO RAISE CHILDREN.
 

Forum List

Back
Top