Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
cute, a one sided story and the leftist just know he's guilty.
no witness
just hearsay for evidence
yea, case closed
cute, a one sided story and the leftist just know he's guilty.
no witness
just hearsay for evidence
yea, case closed
Yep, thats how they roll. And the rest of the story....
Besemann said he asked the Itasca County Sheriff’s Office to investigate, but they declined, Besemann said, because it was a property line dispute. Besemann said the Itasca County Attorney’s Office also declined to prosecute Weber.
“Everything on my side of the line is going to go,” Weber told the paper. “I took it down like I told her (Anderson) I was going to.”
On Oct. 3, 2013, months after the garage had been halved, Roger Weber paid to have the land re-surveyed. Indeed, the correct property line between what had been Robert Weber’s land and Roger Weber’s land runs about halfway through the garage, almost exactly where the garage was cut.
I would think Besemann has an issue with Webers sister, who sold him the property. Then again Besemann knew about the land dispute and just assumed (hoped) it would end in his favor.cute, a one sided story and the leftist just know he's guilty.
no witness
just hearsay for evidence
yea, case closed
Yep, thats how they roll. And the rest of the story....
Besemann said he asked the Itasca County Sheriff’s Office to investigate, but they declined, Besemann said, because it was a property line dispute. Besemann said the Itasca County Attorney’s Office also declined to prosecute Weber.
“Everything on my side of the line is going to go,” Weber told the paper. “I took it down like I told her (Anderson) I was going to.”
On Oct. 3, 2013, months after the garage had been halved, Roger Weber paid to have the land re-surveyed. Indeed, the correct property line between what had been Robert Weber’s land and Roger Weber’s land runs about halfway through the garage, almost exactly where the garage was cut.
So maybe it wasn't the best way to handle it, but the half of the garage was on his property.
Methinks this has less to do with an issue with the new owner, and more to do with a sibling grudge that has probably been going on for decades.
I would think Besemann has an issue with Webers sister, who sold him the property. Then again Besemann knew about the land dispute and just assumed (hoped) it would end in his favor.cute, a one sided story and the leftist just know he's guilty.
no witness
just hearsay for evidence
yea, case closed
Yep, thats how they roll. And the rest of the story....
Besemann said he asked the Itasca County Sheriff’s Office to investigate, but they declined, Besemann said, because it was a property line dispute. Besemann said the Itasca County Attorney’s Office also declined to prosecute Weber.
“Everything on my side of the line is going to go,” Weber told the paper. “I took it down like I told her (Anderson) I was going to.”
On Oct. 3, 2013, months after the garage had been halved, Roger Weber paid to have the land re-surveyed. Indeed, the correct property line between what had been Robert Weber’s land and Roger Weber’s land runs about halfway through the garage, almost exactly where the garage was cut.
So maybe it wasn't the best way to handle it, but the half of the garage was on his property.
Methinks this has less to do with an issue with the new owner, and more to do with a sibling grudge that has probably been going on for decades.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
A rational person wouldn't assume 1/2 the story is the whole story and make accusations based on 1/2 the info.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
So we should take matters into our own hands? This is the mindset of someone running for public office?
If I had a property line issue I'd call my Attorney who would handle the matter. That's what a RATIONAL person would do.
A rational person wouldn't assume 1/2 the story is the whole story and make accusations based on 1/2 the info.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
So we should take matters into our own hands? This is the mindset of someone running for public office?
If I had a property line issue I'd call my Attorney who would handle the matter. That's what a RATIONAL person would do.
but you're a leftist, hearing what you want to hear is enough.
If the law is to be followed they need to remove another 5 feet of the garage. There is usually a set back on building so close to the property line.Minnesota House candidate sued for sawing garage in half - TwinCities.com
Here is the whole story and the property line goes exactly where he cut it. They have been fighting this for a few years now, and the local DA wouldn't hear it. It's obvious the guy suing has no standing.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
So we should take matters into our own hands? This is the mindset of someone running for public office?
If I had a property line issue I'd call my Attorney who would handle the matter. That's what a RATIONAL person would do.
The remedy was legal. Go built something on someone"s property and try it.A rational person wouldn't assume 1/2 the story is the whole story and make accusations based on 1/2 the info.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
So we should take matters into our own hands? This is the mindset of someone running for public office?
If I had a property line issue I'd call my Attorney who would handle the matter. That's what a RATIONAL person would do.
but you're a leftist, hearing what you want to hear is enough.
A rational person would have sought a legal remedy, which proves this Republican (like most) is irrational.
The mind of a Democrat, only get one side of a story and run with it, the truth be damned.
So we should take matters into our own hands? This is the mindset of someone running for public office?
If I had a property line issue I'd call my Attorney who would handle the matter. That's what a RATIONAL person would do.
Ask the President, if he doesn't get his way, Constitution be damned and he uses an executive order to get his way, so you tell me, are you asking in all cases or just one because they are a Republican? You. Are a partisan nut, so rational is out the window with you anyway.
