Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Todd,Obama cut spending in FY 2010?
In what areas?
Todd,
You sell mutual funds, don't you...
Do you understand what a compound average growth rate tells you?
There's no point in using numbers if you are, in fact, innumerate.
You're gonna HATE it when we go to outcomes..
If that is an argument you wish to engage in, start a thread.Can't admit that Obama increased spending in FY2010, can you?
If that is an argument you wish to engage in, start a thread.
Just hope that, should I get involved, I participate with more integrity than you.
The numbers, Todd..Don't run away now.
Any examples of Clinton and Obama insisting on lower spending levels?
The numbers, Todd..
Address them.
I don't give a shit about your invented qualifications.
Is that what you've been doing, Toddy?I showed you the numbers. $572 billion in TARP loans.
Show me how that makes Obama a budget hawk.
Or run away.
Is that what you've been doing, Toddy?
Running away?
Define it, so we know going forward...
I can't run away with my boot in your ass.
Bush spent about $2.845 trillion in FY 2009.
Obama added $140 billion, according to your source, and the net TARP
lending in FY 2009 was about $572 billion.
How much did that budget hawk Obama spend in FY 2010? LOL!
Was it $3.457 trillion? 21.5% more than Bush. What a guy!
Where is the source for this Toddyjive?Bush spent about $2.845 trillion in FY 2009
Where is the source for this Toddyjive?
It wouldn't be Toddy, would it?
You couldn't follow my math? DURR
The shit you make up is irrelevant, Toddy.
Ask me why.
I took 2009 FY spending, subtracted what your source said Obama was responsible for and then I subtracted the $572 billion in TARP loans.
You see, if FY 2010 was $60 billion less than in FY 2009, that's not a $60 billion cut in spending, that's a $512 billion increase.
Unless $572 billion of spending in FY 2010 was TARP lending. Was it?
Why?and then I subtracted the $572 billion in TARP loans.
Why?
Did you add back his ESAs for Iraqnam?
Have you figured out why he would request LESS in 09 than he had in 08?
Stick to the known. Acknowledge what it shows, THEN start whining.
Now post the results of compounding $1 for 16 years at the rates given.
Why would I not include temporary, emergency loans in the baseline?
I thought you were a finance guy? Do you always ask such stupid questions?
Did you add back his ESAs for Iraqnam?
If they were dollars spent in FY 2009, they're already in FY 2009 spending.
Do you think ESAs aren't in the spending you posted?
Have you figured out why he would request LESS in 09 than he had in 08?
Who said he requested less? Link?
Maybe the dems in Congress didn't let him spend as much as he wanted?
Because they weren't outlays until issued..
TARP funds were dispersed over a 3 year schedule. Even when issued, they would have to be reduced by amounts paid back in FY 2009.
You appear unaware that ESAs were EXCLUDED from the regular budget and therefore the deficit, until FY 2010.
2008 United States federal budget - Wikipedia
$2.902 trillion (requested)[2]
I want MY answers now, Toddy.
Because they weren't outlays until issued..
If they were spent in FY 2009, they're included in the spending.
TARP funds were dispersed over a 3 year schedule.
And about $572 billion were spent in FY 2009, repaid later.
You appear unaware that ESAs were EXCLUDED from the regular budget and therefore the deficit, until FY 2010.
Sounds awful! How much should we subtract from Obama's FY2010 numbers?
$2.902 trillion (requested)
A request doesn't mean it was spent. DURR
No more, Toddy...you can persist in Ignorance longer than your clients can stay solvent.
I want my answers now.
Toddy,Don't cry so hard when you run away.
Toddy,
You've run away from EVERY question.
You've been indulged.
I don't feel compelled to correct all your misconceptions....
What is the value of $1 compounded at 6.35% for 16 years?
What is the value of $1 compounded at 2.5% for 16 years?
This time, Toddy...
