Diuretic
Permanently confused
that certainly is your opinion. However, You'll have to forgive me for aborting any actual consideration of such things.
snails nor a caterpillars are genetically distinct human beings. a fetus is. I'll go ahead and stick with this criteria until you can come up with a better retort than butterflies and snails, thanks.
You've not defined any element that makes human life inherently superior to nonhuman animal life with similar sensory capacities and ability to suffer. For instance, an adult chimpanzee would be superior in terms of both basic sentience and self-awareness than a human fetus would be. Asserting that a human fetus is of superior moral value simply because it is a member of the species homo sapiens is not an argument; it is a petitio principii (begging the question) fallacy. You need to offer appropriate arguments in favor of your conclusion.
it is alive.....it is a person....it is human and it has rights......unless the mother decides otherwise.....
You provide a conclusion, yet offer no reasons or arguments in support of your conclusion?
if it wasn't alive you wouldn't have to abort it.....if it wasn't a person wasn't human and didn't have rights scott peterson would not have been charged with murder for killing one......
abortion is leagalized murder of a human life ..... same as the death penalty ......
Peterson was convicted of the murder of his wife and the murder of her foetus.
The California Penal Code specifically separates person and foetus.
187. (a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
fetus, with malice aforethought.
So you can't reference the Peterson conviction to try and define a foetus' status as a person.