9th circus dissmisses case agaisnt sanctuarys in Steinle family lawsuit

[bodecea]

How do you claim that the 9th is "incredibly biased"? And what was the court's determination for making the ruling they made?

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

So you have NO IDEA why you are ranting?

Here, explain what is legally incorrect in their ruling.

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

I have no idea why you are treasonous skank.

Well.....of course not. You are proud in your ignorance, aren't you?

 

[danielpalos]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

 

[bodecea]

So...anyone want to discuss if the ruling was incorrect or not?

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

 

[danielpalos]

You knew as soon as the case got moved to the incredibly biased 9th circuit, there was little hope justice would be carried out.

How do you claim that the 9th is "incredibly biased"? And what was the court's determination for making the ruling they made?

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

So you have NO IDEA why you are ranting?

Here, explain what is legally incorrect in their ruling.

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

Ten simple Commandments from a God not the Expense of Government.

 

[bodecea]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Sure sounds like he was conveying a threat, doesn't it?

 

[miketx]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

 

[bodecea]

How do you claim that the 9th is "incredibly biased"? And what was the court's determination for making the ruling they made?

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

So you have NO IDEA why you are ranting?

Here, explain what is legally incorrect in their ruling.

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

Ten simple Commandments from a God not the Expense of Government.

Say what?

 

[The Original Tree]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

The 9th Circuit is disgusting. These people are just Evil and they are Judges?

I hope the family appeals. Doing anything in The 9th Circuit is pointless. They are Marxists and Judicial Activists and these people believe America is Evil and its laws are unjust.

 

[bodecea]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

The 9th Circuit is disgusting. These people are just Evil and they are Judges?

I hope the family appeals. Doing anything in The 9th Circuit is pointless. They are Marxists and Judicial Activists and these people believe America is Evil and its laws are unjust.

Tell us what is incorrect legally about the 9th's decision, Comrade.

 

[depotoo]

Here was their reasoning-

“The tragic and unnecessary death of Steinle may well underscore the policy argument against Sheriff Mirkarimi’s decision to bar his employees from providing the release date of a many times convicted felon to ICE,” the panel decided.

“But that policy argument can be acted upon only by California’s state and municipal political branches of government, or perhaps by Congress — but not by federal judges applying California law,” the panel said.
Kate Steinle case: Dismissal of parents’ suit against San Francisco is upheld

 

[Dick Foster]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

The ninth circus is just a stop on the way to SCOTUS where they are routinely overturned. But someone really does need to take that piece of shit apart and fix it.

 

[danielpalos]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Sure sounds like he was conveying a threat, doesn't it?

we have "under God" in our pledge; why do our politicians bear so much false witness?

 

[The Original Tree]

Here was their reasoning-

“The tragic and unnecessary death of Steinle may well underscore the policy argument against Sheriff Mirkarimi’s decision to bar his employees from providing the release date of a many times convicted felon to ICE,” the panel decided.

“But that policy argument can be acted upon only by California’s state and municipal political branches of government, or perhaps by Congress — but not by federal judges applying California law,” the panel said.
Kate Steinle case: Dismissal of parents’ suit against San Francisco is upheld

That makes no Sense at all.

They stick their noses in to whatever they feel like. State or Federal. The fact they ran from this like Hell tells me it has merit and needs to be appealed to the next level.

 

[danielpalos]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

 

[danielpalos]

Do go out of your way to prove what a blathering idiot you are? Or like most filthy trolls, do you just like to play games and spew BS?

I am asking what the ruling was based on....don't you think that would be a key point here? Or do you just like to foam at the mouth for no valid reason?

Well, since it doesn't say so in the link HOW IN BLOODY HELL WOULD I KNOW? I don't make up CRAP like you idiots do!

So you have NO IDEA why you are ranting?

Here, explain what is legally incorrect in their ruling.

A federal appeals court in California ruled that the parents of Kate Steinle, a woman fatally shot by an unauthorized immigrant in July 2015, cannot sue the city of San Francisco for failing to notify immigration officials of his release from a local jail weeks before the killing.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, ruled that San Francisco's then-sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, violated no federal, state or local laws when he released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, also known as José Inez Garcia Zarate, on a minor marijuana charge without notifying Immigration and Custom Enforcement.

The ruling upholds a lower court in dismissing "a general negligence claim" against the city filed by Steinle's parents. Their suit alleged that Mirkarimi drew up a memorandum instructing city employees to limit the information shared with federal officials about the release of unauthorized immigrants from the San Francisco jail.

"Our holding today makes no judgment as to whether or not the policy established by the Memo was wise or prudent. That is not our job," the panel wrote.

The judges said city's policy did not violate federal law and that Mirkarimi had a right to enforce the memo.

Ten simple Commandments from a God not the Expense of Government.

Say what?

morals, what is that?

 

[WillowTree]

Appeal the decision. Most of the 9th Circuit's decisions are over turned. Sanctuary policy is what got Kate Steinle murdered.
This particular illegal felon is just the instrument of San Francisco's illegal policies.

Is there immunity when sanctuary policies which are known to result in the murder of American citizens (like the Bologna family of San Francisco, for instance) are promoted by politicians there?

It will be referred to the Supreme Court!

 

[WillowTree]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

 

[bodecea]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

The ninth circus is just a stop on the way to SCOTUS where they are routinely overturned. But someone really does need to take that piece of shit apart and fix it.

And yet...another person who cannot seem to address this actual decision in this actual case.

What is legally incorrect in their decision?

 

[bodecea]

Appeal the decision. Most of the 9th Circuit's decisions are over turned. Sanctuary policy is what got Kate Steinle murdered.
This particular illegal felon is just the instrument of San Francisco's illegal policies.

Is there immunity when sanctuary policies which are known to result in the murder of American citizens (like the Bologna family of San Francisco, for instance) are promoted by politicians there?

It will be referred to the Supreme Court!

Based on what, exactly?

 

[bodecea]

Damn liberals are SCUM!
This is a disgusting slap in the face to this family. Disgusting liberal scum need to be dealt with.


Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

In this country, the inmates literally run the asylum. Our court system is of, by, and for illegal aliens, while Americans, including those killed by illegal aliens, are left out in the cold. The upshot of the latest ruling from the Ninth Circuit is that while illegal aliens can now sue our country and win judgments against law enforcement for enforcing federal law, victims of illegal aliens cannot sue sanctuary cities for thwarting federal law and causing the deaths of their loved ones. Welcome to the new America.


The Ninth Circuit and many other liberal courts believe they are a super-legislature, holding the sole and final say over broad public policy issues. They believe they are not constrained by rules of standing and can grant standing to any foreign national to sue American officials and law enforcement for rights to enter, remain, steal citizenship, be counted in the census, obtain welfare, and never be deported. Yet Kate Steinle’s parents, who are not seeking a public policy edict from the courts but rather an individualized claim against the city of San Francisco, are deemed not to have an actionable claim because government officials have immunity.
Ninth Circuit dismisses Steinle family lawsuit against sanctuary

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Nice spin! Deflect away!

only illegals don't care about the law.

And libtards! They don’t care either. That’s why Steinle is dead!

I have expressed my thoughts & prayers at her death.