Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Constitution seldom stopped liberals in the past. So, seems likely it won't this time either.
If the Constitution were followed as written, would liberalism exist?
According to several on here, the people that wrote the Constitution were liberals.
Maybe that's why they're so dissatisfied with it.
The most overturned court in history.
Only today's Liberals advance the lie that the Founders were their kin.
They were not.
They envisioned a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
That identifies them as classical liberals, or what we would call conservatives today.
The most overturned court in history.
How ‘liberal’ reputation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is overblown, scholars say
How 'liberal' reputation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is overblown, scholars say
Only today's Liberals advance the lie that the Founders were their kin.
They were not.
They envisioned a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
That identifies them as classical liberals, or what we would call conservatives today.
Ignorance personified by the above nitwit.,....
Prior to the Civil War, virtually ALL of the government's income was from tariffs on trade.
The most overturned court in history.
How ‘liberal’ reputation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is overblown, scholars say
How 'liberal' reputation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is overblown, scholars say
The court has a duty to interpret the Constitution
No one is questioning to right of the Executive Branch to set policy on immigration. But that policy must conform with the Constitution
Is Trumps ban too broad?
Is it an unconstitutional ban on a specific religion?
Does it exceed Executive authority?
Is there a specific threat affecting national safety that would justify such a ban?
That is why we have courts
Funny... never questioned such an order before.
It is for the courts to determine what is constitutionalNo matter what crying is done by snowflakes, until they get 8 US Code 1182 section (f) changed, TRUMP'S TRAVEL BAN IS 100% CONSTITUTIONAL.
Read the actual statute and make up your own mind if what Trump did was illegal.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.
.
.
.
.
He proclaimed by Executive order that for periods ranging from 60 to 120 days that ALL PERSONS from 7 specific nations are under a travel ban.
Here is the actual EO:
EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES
The EO dos not violate 8 US 1182 (f).
The lawsuits trying to overturn the ban based on it being "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" are bullshit and bogus.
Nat, do you know what the procedure is when SCOTUS vote is 4-4? I do. You have to google it though 'cause you wouldn't believe me..Prediction: They will vote against Trump and eventually be overturned.
By whom???? The SCOTUS is evenly split....Try the Vatican next....
The court has a duty to interpret the Constitution
No one is questioning to right of the Executive Branch to set policy on immigration. But that policy must conform with the Constitution
Is Trumps ban too broad?
Is it an unconstitutional ban on a specific religion?
Does it exceed Executive authority?
Is there a specific threat affecting national safety that would justify such a ban?
That is why we have courts
Political Chic once again, makes her case with verifiable facts, and then hammers the point home. ......
Jeezus! The law is carved in stone.It is for the courts to determine what is constitutionalNo matter what crying is done by snowflakes, until they get 8 US Code 1182 section (f) changed, TRUMP'S TRAVEL BAN IS 100% CONSTITUTIONAL.
Read the actual statute and make up your own mind if what Trump did was illegal.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.
.
.
.
.
He proclaimed by Executive order that for periods ranging from 60 to 120 days that ALL PERSONS from 7 specific nations are under a travel ban.
Here is the actual EO:
EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES
The EO dos not violate 8 US 1182 (f).
The lawsuits trying to overturn the ban based on it being "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" are bullshit and bogus.
Not anonymous message board posters
The court has a duty to interpret the Constitution
No one is questioning to right of the Executive Branch to set policy on immigration. But that policy must conform with the Constitution
Is Trumps ban too broad?
Is it an unconstitutional ban on a specific religion?
Does it exceed Executive authority?
Is there a specific threat affecting national safety that would justify such a ban?
That is why we have courts
Prediction: They will vote against Trump and eventually be overturned.
By whom???? The SCOTUS is evenly split....Try the Vatican next....
