6 months after Sandy, thousands homeless in NY, NJ

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2011
170,020
47,209
2,180
Six months after Superstorm Sandy devastated the Jersey shore and New York City and pounded coastal areas of New England, the region is dealing with a slow and frustrating, yet often hopeful, recovery. Tens of thousands of people remain homeless. Housing, business, tourism and coastal protection all remain major issues with the summer vacation — and hurricane — seasons almost here again.

"Some families and some lives have come back together quickly and well, and some people are up and running almost as if nothing ever happened, and for them it's been fine," New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a news conference Thursday. "Some people are still very much in the midst of recovery. You still have people in hotel rooms, you still have people doubled up, you still have people fighting with insurance companies, and for them it's been terrible and horrendous."

6 months after Sandy, thousands homeless in NY, NJ
 
Remember the outcry about Katrina? No need to worry suffering and hardship under Obama is different.

Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie
 
Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina.

and you had a problem with that?

Oh yeah, how was the Obama admin's response to Sandy?

Obviously Obama's response has been entirely inefficient. Those thousands of people who are still homeless because of Sandy are witness to that effect. Oh, that is right, maybe they don't count because most were middle class Americans who actually owned their homes and did not live in the projects.

Immie
 
Remember the outcry about Katrina? No need to worry suffering and hardship under Obama is different.

Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

obama is the untouchable
 
Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

obama is the untouchable

Untouchable or unmentionable? :eusa_angel:

Immie
 
Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

obama is the untouchable

Untouchable or unmentionable? :eusa_angel:

Immie

gangster.%252520obama%252520jpg%25255B4%25255D.jpg


But I say
obama-ohio%252520big%252520black%252520bus%25255B3%25255D.jpg
 
Remember the outcry about Katrina? No need to worry suffering and hardship under Obama is different.

Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.
 
Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina.

and you had a problem with that?

Oh yeah, how was the Obama admin's response to Sandy?

Obviously Obama's response has been entirely inefficient. Those thousands of people who are still homeless because of Sandy are witness to that effect. Oh, that is right, maybe they don't count because most were middle class Americans who actually owned their homes and did not live in the projects.

Immie

Obama admins response? What happened with Congressional funding games? The response was as flawless as can be in today's world. The there is what followed the response. :evil: Conservative GOP bullshit
 
and then the right wing imbeciles fall back on plan F: Flood threads with imbecilic posts filled with personal attacks on everybody and everything

:clap2:

2014 is right around the corner and if this is all they've got, the damn Democrats will walk right in and ...
 
Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.


The gross negligence from katrina, came from the local democrat leaders.
 
Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.


The gross negligence from katrina, came from the local democrat leaders.

really? Local Democrats were in charge of FEMA? :eek:
 
Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.


The gross negligence from katrina, came from the local democrat leaders.
Yes but buoooooosh was president.
 
There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.


The gross negligence from katrina, came from the local democrat leaders.

really? Local Democrats were in charge of FEMA? :eek:
Actually local democrats did not follow the preapproved emergency plan.
 
Remember the outcry about Katrina? No need to worry suffering and hardship under Obama is different.

Katrina was far worse. Can't compare the 2.

And the government responded much faster and in greater capacity for Sandy.

Yes, Katrina was far worse. And President Bush was hammered by the libs for his "insufficient" response to Katrina. Sandy wasn't near as bad as Katrina, yet it seems that President Obama's response has been much worse than Bush's was for Katrina. How come we don't hear those same liberals hammering Obama over this?

Immie

???? The President was on it from minute one , just ask REPUBLICAN Governor Chris Christy. The republican bible thumping cockroaches from jesusland in the congress wanted to hold back funding

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is not a single way that the response to Sandy was worse than that of Katrina. Katrina was a study in gross negligence. Criticism of Obama's response to Sandy is just spin from the right. There were people from the state and federal government on the ground the next day.


The gross negligence from katrina, came from the local democrat leaders.
Yes but buoooooosh was president.

The aging rebel has his short term memory back? Cool, the new meds are doing their job :clap2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top