Discussion in 'Politics' started by RodISHI, Oct 17, 2009.
I can see it now 53 Republics are now on the hit list of the radical Leftwingnuts.
You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.
Absolutely but damn give the kids a chance to go to a "safe and moral" environment if they attend public schools. Most people do not want their children taught or exploited by perverts period. It is not up to schools to teach "morals" yet the schools should be required to act with "moral" intent towards all children. That covers a lot of ground. From lying teachers to pressing your religion or personal beliefs onto children. Get the schools back to the basics. I'm sorry but a porn writer and director has no business teaching in a public school full of teenage girls either. I do not think that college professors should ever be allowed to be pimping out college students either. These are the "moral" type decisions people are asking for up to an including staying away from teaching children sexual practices of any kind in school. Schools are not respecting children or there parents when they allow such to transpire within public schools. The majority of people do not have an option for private schools so at least demand some decency from the public school system. Public schools were never supposed to be indoctrination clinics for any type of special interest group, none.
I'm good with safe. Moral implies some sort of instillment of "values", even "patriotic values" shouldn't be taught in the schools. I think we've taken this using public schools to indoctrinate children and come up with a perfect God loving / and or tolerant homosexual prototype thing a little to far, period. I agree with you on the perverts thing though, and of ALL the so-called "exposed" members of Obama's White House staff this is the one I have reservations about because he IS in a position to effect the Education system. I don't care if he's homosexual either, that's fine, what you do on your time is your business but don't push ANY sexuality on my (futuristic) children. As long as they're in my (futuristic) house I push my own beliefs on them and that's MY right not yours. Jennings IS however a pervert for the whole child comming to him about a grown man thing. Quite frankly I'm suspicious of any teacher who has a "close relationship" to the student without parental involvement, outside of I help this child out after school because he doesn't have anyone else to turn to.
Glad to see that my Republican Congresswoman didn't put her name on this foolishness. I think doing the opposite of whatever it is Michelle Bachman does is just good policy.
Oh please. This letter carries NO weight and is basically meaningless. I don't think any on the left will worry themselves with the 53 morons who were dumb enough to lend their names to it.
Michelle Bachman is oinkly and boinkly like Sarah Palin, and just as much a box of rocks as she.
Yup. We will remember their foolishness when we had real matters to attend to at the voting booths.
Michelle Bachmann is so stupid she'll kill herself long before anybody else does
What a load of leftist hogwash -the repondents not the initial post. Moral means in this case leaving it to the parents to instill moral values. Not trampling on the parents views. Moral means you don't use others to please yourself or use them at all.
Separate names with a comma.