30% of laws ignored

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Truthmatters, Jun 19, 2007.

  1. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
  2. hjmick
    Online

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,183
    Thanks Received:
    4,680
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,125
    If, on January 21, 2009, Georgie boy is still sitting behind the desk in the Oval office, then we have dictatorial issues. Until then, despite the questionable Constitutionality of the practice, he's not doing anything that has been deemed illegal. You and I both know that if he were the Democrats would be on him like white on rice.

    I am of the opinion that Congress should work to eliminate this little gem of Presidential power. But they won't. And they won't for one reason. Because their guy might be the next President, and they certainly want him (or her) to have the same powers as the last guy. I don't like the use of signing statements, I don't care what party is in office.
     
  3. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    by Brian Beutler

    "commissioned by Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and released today -- confirms that Bush's use of presidential signing statements are, in fact, utterly without precedent."

    http://www.alternet.org/story/54543/


    I think they are doing something about it.
     
  4. hjmick
    Online

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,183
    Thanks Received:
    4,680
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,125
    Arlen Specter has tried before.

    From the article you linked:

    "In 2006, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) introduced legislation that would have forbidden federal courts from legitimating presidential signing statements and allowed Congress to bring up the question of their constitutionality before the Supreme Court. But the bill never made it to the Senate floor and expired at the end of the 109th Congress."

    Let's hope that new efforts to eliminate this little gem of Presidential power meets with more success that dying quietly in the back rooms of Congress. I don't like the idea of any President having this ability, even one I vote for.
     
  5. Ninja
    Offline

    Ninja Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,220
    Thanks Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Glorious People's Republic of California
    Ratings:
    +377
    The Constitution has been ignored since 1934. That situation needs to be rectified first, and then we can worry about the signing statements.
     
  6. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    That's about right. FDR pretty much wiped his ass with it, and that was that.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page