daveman
Diamond Member
That depends on what the meaning of "is" is, doesn't it?"Impeach" has only one meaning.Could be because "impeach" has two different meanings.
Welcome to our country. Watch your back.
If you drooling idiot leftists could win an argument on the strength of your positions, you wouldn't need to re-define words.
Denseman strikes again. No shame.
Definition of IMPEACH
1
a : to bring an accusation against
b : to charge with a crime or misdemeanor; specifically : to charge (a public official) before a competent tribunal with misconduct in office
c : to remove from office especially for misconduct
I put them in different colors. You know, for you younger readers. You like colors, right?
Andrew Johnson was "impeached" (b). Bill Clinton was "impeached" (b). Richard Nixon would have been "impeached" (b and c), which is why he resigned.
None of them were "impeached" (c).
Welcome to our country. Might be worth it to learn our language, especially if you're going to comment on government.
Meanwhile, thanks for proving that Ed Schultz, noted liberal commentator, was completely wrong when he said Clinton wasn't impeached.
Last edited: